<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Anthropology of the Econ</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/05/anthropology-of-econ.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/05/anthropology-of-econ.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:45:14 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave Iverson</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/05/anthropology-of-econ.html#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Iverson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 17:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/05/the-anthropology-of-the-econ/#comment-93</guid>
		<description>Over at Mark Thoma&#039;s blog I quoted reader Tapen Sinha: &lt;em&gt;... the article was written back in 1973 Are we to believe that nothing has changed since?&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Then I noted that in &lt;em&gt;The Black Swan&lt;/em&gt;, Nassim Taleb answers the question to his own liking: ... &lt;em&gt;four decades ago ... [Benoit] Mandelbrot gave pearls to economists ... which they rejected because the ideas &lt;/em&gt;[from complexity theory and fractal geometry]&lt;em&gt; were too good for them.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The bickering among economists and their detractors continues, as it has for a very long time. See, most recently, discussions labeled &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.tpmcafe.com/book_title/hip_heterodoxy&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Hip Heterodoxy&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Finally, for a very good description of the state of economics read &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://cepa.newschool.edu/het/essays/Walrasiad.htm&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;The Walasaid&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; from The New School.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over at Mark Thoma&#8217;s blog I quoted reader Tapen Sinha: <em>&#8230; the article was written back in 1973 Are we to believe that nothing has changed since?</em></p>
<p>Then I noted that in <em>The Black Swan</em>, Nassim Taleb answers the question to his own liking: &#8230; <em>four decades ago &#8230; [Benoit] Mandelbrot gave pearls to economists &#8230; which they rejected because the ideas </em>[from complexity theory and fractal geometry]<em> were too good for them.</em></p>
<p>The bickering among economists and their detractors continues, as it has for a very long time. See, most recently, discussions labeled <a HREF="http://www.tpmcafe.com/book_title/hip_heterodoxy" REL="nofollow">Hip Heterodoxy</a>. </p>
<p>Finally, for a very good description of the state of economics read <a HREF="http://cepa.newschool.edu/het/essays/Walrasiad.htm" REL="nofollow"><em>The Walasaid</em></a> from The New School.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
