<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bill Gates, Socialist</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/06/bill-gates-socialist.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/06/bill-gates-socialist.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:11:10 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Yves Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/06/bill-gates-socialist.html#comment-99</link>
		<dc:creator>Yves Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 07:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/06/bill-gates-socialist/#comment-99</guid>
		<description>You are correct to point out that Gates&#039; business practices have been far from upstanding.  However, he does seem to be trying via his foundation to take high leverage approaches to helping the most destitute populations. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;So far, he may merely be suffering from a very bad case of cognitive dissonance. And he has not done anything that would undermine the interests of his class (unlike FDR, who as Krugman points out in an op-ed piece in today&#039;s New York Times, would have failed the modern test of authenticity, since he continued to live like the rich man he was, but implemented policies that worked against his economic interests).&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;However, I am also reminded of a New Republic book review by Omer Bartok titled &quot;The Fragility of Goodness:  Why Bulgaria&#039;s Jews Survived the Holocaust&quot;:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;i&gt;But the lesson is not quite so simple or so edifying. For we also learn from such instances that the difference between virtue and vice is far less radical than we would like to believe.  Sometimes the most effective kind of goodness – I mean the practical kind, the kind that can actually save lives and not merely alleviate the conscience of the protagonists – is carried out by those who have already compromised themselves with evil, those who are members of the very organizations that have set ball rolling toward the abyss.  Hence a strange and frustrating contradiction: that absolute goodness is often surprisingly ineffective,  while compromised, splintered and ambiguous goodness, one that is touched and stained by evil, is the only kind that may set limits to mass murder. And while absolute evil is indeed defined by its consistent one-dimensionality, this more mundane sort of wickedness, the most prevalent sort, contains within itself also seeds of goodness that may be stimulated and encouraged by the example of the few dwellers of these nether regions who may have come to recognize their own moral potential.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are correct to point out that Gates&#8217; business practices have been far from upstanding.  However, he does seem to be trying via his foundation to take high leverage approaches to helping the most destitute populations. </p>
<p>So far, he may merely be suffering from a very bad case of cognitive dissonance. And he has not done anything that would undermine the interests of his class (unlike FDR, who as Krugman points out in an op-ed piece in today&#8217;s New York Times, would have failed the modern test of authenticity, since he continued to live like the rich man he was, but implemented policies that worked against his economic interests).</p>
<p>However, I am also reminded of a New Republic book review by Omer Bartok titled &#8220;The Fragility of Goodness:  Why Bulgaria&#8217;s Jews Survived the Holocaust&#8221;:</p>
<p><i>But the lesson is not quite so simple or so edifying. For we also learn from such instances that the difference between virtue and vice is far less radical than we would like to believe.  Sometimes the most effective kind of goodness – I mean the practical kind, the kind that can actually save lives and not merely alleviate the conscience of the protagonists – is carried out by those who have already compromised themselves with evil, those who are members of the very organizations that have set ball rolling toward the abyss.  Hence a strange and frustrating contradiction: that absolute goodness is often surprisingly ineffective,  while compromised, splintered and ambiguous goodness, one that is touched and stained by evil, is the only kind that may set limits to mass murder. And while absolute evil is indeed defined by its consistent one-dimensionality, this more mundane sort of wickedness, the most prevalent sort, contains within itself also seeds of goodness that may be stimulated and encouraged by the example of the few dwellers of these nether regions who may have come to recognize their own moral potential.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: unlawflcombatnt</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/06/bill-gates-socialist.html#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>unlawflcombatnt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 06:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/06/bill-gates-socialist/#comment-98</guid>
		<description>Gates is a hypocritical scumbag. He hates American workers, and stoops as low as going to Congress to lobby for unlimited H1B visas, so that foreign workers can undercut the wages of American workers who&#039;ve spent years being educated and trained to do high-skilled jobs that can be done by an H1B visa holder for lower wages. Needless to say, this drives down the wages of American workers. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Gates is nothing but a dishonest gasbag. He revealed his true motivation in the passage you quoted when he he said &quot;&lt;i&gt;If we can find approaches that meet the needs of the poor &lt;b&gt;in ways that generate profits for business and votes for politicians&lt;/b&gt;, we will have found a sustainable way to reduce inequity in the world....&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&quot;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Gates is scumbag, pure and simple. This quotation of Gates&#039; would have been far more impressive if his underlying motivation and objectives weren&#039;t already clear. Gates has worked to monopolize much of the internet market through Microsoft by unethical, if not illegal practices. To this day Gates is doing everything possible to depress the wages of high-tech American workers, by lobbying to Congress to remove the caps on H1B visas. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;unlawflcombatnt&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.unlawflcombatnt.proboards84.com&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Economic Populist Forum&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gates is a hypocritical scumbag. He hates American workers, and stoops as low as going to Congress to lobby for unlimited H1B visas, so that foreign workers can undercut the wages of American workers who&#8217;ve spent years being educated and trained to do high-skilled jobs that can be done by an H1B visa holder for lower wages. Needless to say, this drives down the wages of American workers. </p>
<p>Gates is nothing but a dishonest gasbag. He revealed his true motivation in the passage you quoted when he he said &#8220;<i>If we can find approaches that meet the needs of the poor <b>in ways that generate profits for business and votes for politicians</b>, we will have found a sustainable way to reduce inequity in the world&#8230;.<br /></i>&#8220;</p>
<p>Gates is scumbag, pure and simple. This quotation of Gates&#8217; would have been far more impressive if his underlying motivation and objectives weren&#8217;t already clear. Gates has worked to monopolize much of the internet market through Microsoft by unethical, if not illegal practices. To this day Gates is doing everything possible to depress the wages of high-tech American workers, by lobbying to Congress to remove the caps on H1B visas. </p>
<p>unlawflcombatnt</p>
<p><a HREF="http://www.unlawflcombatnt.proboards84.com" REL="nofollow">Economic Populist Forum</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
