<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dubious Research (Investor Attitudes Edition)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/07/dubious-research-investor-attitudes.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/07/dubious-research-investor-attitudes.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:47:30 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/07/dubious-research-investor-attitudes.html#comment-225</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 16:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/07/dubious-research-investor-attitudes-edition/#comment-225</guid>
		<description>You are absolutely correct.  I don&#039;t survey often, but one thing that I try to do is impose a constraint on decision-making.  Here&#039;s how such a survey would have looked like for the example that you cite.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;You are creating a scoring system for how you choose companies to invest in.  You have 100 points to allocate between the following issues:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Corporate Governance&lt;br/&gt;Current Earnings Power&lt;br/&gt;Likely Earnings Growth&lt;br/&gt;Inexpensiveness versus Replacement Cost&lt;br/&gt;Barriers to Entry&lt;br/&gt;Ethics of the Business, and those who run it&lt;br/&gt;Balance Sheet Quality&lt;br/&gt;Earnings Quality&lt;br/&gt;(Etc., but limit it to ten choices.)&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;How do you allocate your points?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Survey like this force discipline on the answerer, because it reflects decision-making in the real world.  There are many variables, and choices are constrained.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;David Merkel&lt;br/&gt;Alephblog.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are absolutely correct.  I don&#8217;t survey often, but one thing that I try to do is impose a constraint on decision-making.  Here&#8217;s how such a survey would have looked like for the example that you cite.</p>
<p>You are creating a scoring system for how you choose companies to invest in.  You have 100 points to allocate between the following issues:</p>
<p>Corporate Governance<br />Current Earnings Power<br />Likely Earnings Growth<br />Inexpensiveness versus Replacement Cost<br />Barriers to Entry<br />Ethics of the Business, and those who run it<br />Balance Sheet Quality<br />Earnings Quality<br />(Etc., but limit it to ten choices.)</p>
<p>How do you allocate your points?</p>
<p>Survey like this force discipline on the answerer, because it reflects decision-making in the real world.  There are many variables, and choices are constrained.</p>
<p>David Merkel<br />Alephblog.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
