<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Moody&#8217;s Cuts Ratings on $5.2 Billion of Subprime-Related Bonds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/07/moodys-cuts-ratings-on-52-billion-of.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/07/moodys-cuts-ratings-on-52-billion-of.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:52:37 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/07/moodys-cuts-ratings-on-52-billion-of.html#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 18:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/07/moodys-cuts-ratings-on-52-billion-of-subprime-related-bonds/#comment-198</guid>
		<description>One correction... in braod terms, at insurance companies, the amount of capital one has to hold against a bond varies with the rating.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;0 = Treasuries&lt;br/&gt;1 = AAA, AA, A&lt;br/&gt;2 = BBB&lt;br/&gt;3 = BB&lt;br/&gt;4 = B&lt;br/&gt;5 = CCC, CC, C&lt;br/&gt;6 = Default&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Capital charges are very small for class 1, and progressively bigger as ratings decline.  There may be some states with absolute limits in junk bond holdings, but most don&#039;t.  The real limits come from the amount of capital that the insurers have to hold.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Also, insurers to the extent that they held any of this paper, tended to hold the AAA stuff.  This isn&#039;t an issue for the grand majority of the insurers, with the possible exception of the financial guarantors.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;David Merkel&lt;br/&gt;Alephblog.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One correction&#8230; in braod terms, at insurance companies, the amount of capital one has to hold against a bond varies with the rating.</p>
<p>0 = Treasuries<br />1 = AAA, AA, A<br />2 = BBB<br />3 = BB<br />4 = B<br />5 = CCC, CC, C<br />6 = Default</p>
<p>Capital charges are very small for class 1, and progressively bigger as ratings decline.  There may be some states with absolute limits in junk bond holdings, but most don&#8217;t.  The real limits come from the amount of capital that the insurers have to hold.</p>
<p>Also, insurers to the extent that they held any of this paper, tended to hold the AAA stuff.  This isn&#8217;t an issue for the grand majority of the insurers, with the possible exception of the financial guarantors.</p>
<p>David Merkel<br />Alephblog.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/07/moodys-cuts-ratings-on-52-billion-of.html#comment-197</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 03:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/07/moodys-cuts-ratings-on-52-billion-of-subprime-related-bonds/#comment-197</guid>
		<description>I just found your blog recently. Quite good. One suggestion: add a time and date stamp to each post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just found your blog recently. Quite good. One suggestion: add a time and date stamp to each post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
