<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Were Some Derivatives Trades Primarily About Tax Avoidance?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/07/were-some-derivatives-trades-primarily.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/07/were-some-derivatives-trades-primarily.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 02:08:55 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/07/were-some-derivatives-trades-primarily.html#comment-254</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 21:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/07/were-some-derivatives-trades-primarily-about-tax-avoidance/#comment-254</guid>
		<description>Were Some Derivatives Trades Primarily About Tax Avoidance?  Of course.  Dividend arbitrage has been going on for at least 20 years.  It&#039;s good to see the IRS ahead of the game...&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;C&#039;mon, if company A has low tax on a dividend and company B has high tax, there are all kinds of derivatives that A and B can trade where both make money.  If that&#039;s not economic, what is?  A sells a call, B buys the call.  Using its tax rate, company B thinks the implicit vol is x; using its tax rate, company A thinks the implicit vol is x + something.   Then A turns around and buys a put from someone, and B sells a put.   Now both A and B have pretty close to a riskless position and a sure profit, all thanks to the taxman who has devised arbitrable rules.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Were Some Derivatives Trades Primarily About Tax Avoidance?  Of course.  Dividend arbitrage has been going on for at least 20 years.  It&#8217;s good to see the IRS ahead of the game&#8230;</p>
<p>C&#8217;mon, if company A has low tax on a dividend and company B has high tax, there are all kinds of derivatives that A and B can trade where both make money.  If that&#8217;s not economic, what is?  A sells a call, B buys the call.  Using its tax rate, company B thinks the implicit vol is x; using its tax rate, company A thinks the implicit vol is x + something.   Then A turns around and buys a put from someone, and B sells a put.   Now both A and B have pretty close to a riskless position and a sure profit, all thanks to the taxman who has devised arbitrable rules.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dd</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/07/were-some-derivatives-trades-primarily.html#comment-253</link>
		<dc:creator>dd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 13:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/07/were-some-derivatives-trades-primarily-about-tax-avoidance/#comment-253</guid>
		<description>As anyone who has followed the saga of LTCM knows, it&#039;s all about tax avoidance. The district court opinion  is a great read especially the Scholes/Stiglitz smackdown @78-86 http://www.usdoj.gov/tax/082704JBALongTermUS.pdf&lt;br/&gt;Long Term Capital Holdings v. United States, 330 F. Supp.2d 122, 199 (D. Conn. 2004), aff’d 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As anyone who has followed the saga of LTCM knows, it&#8217;s all about tax avoidance. The district court opinion  is a great read especially the Scholes/Stiglitz smackdown @78-86 <a href="http://www.usdoj.gov/tax/082704JBALongTermUS.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.usdoj.gov/tax/082704JBALongTermUS.pdf</a><br />Long Term Capital Holdings v. United States, 330 F. Supp.2d 122, 199 (D. Conn. 2004), aff’d 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/07/were-some-derivatives-trades-primarily.html#comment-251</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 06:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/07/were-some-derivatives-trades-primarily-about-tax-avoidance/#comment-251</guid>
		<description>christ. how much f***ing money do these people need ???&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;wankers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>christ. how much f***ing money do these people need ???</p>
<p>wankers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leftcoast</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/07/were-some-derivatives-trades-primarily.html#comment-250</link>
		<dc:creator>leftcoast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 05:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/07/were-some-derivatives-trades-primarily-about-tax-avoidance/#comment-250</guid>
		<description>Time to scrap the Federal Income Tax and subsitute the Automated Payment Transaction Tax proposed by a University of Wisconsin Econonmics professor several years ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time to scrap the Federal Income Tax and subsitute the Automated Payment Transaction Tax proposed by a University of Wisconsin Econonmics professor several years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
