<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Central Bank Efforts to Stabilize Money Markets May Not Be Working</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/08/c.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/08/c.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:39:16 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Yves Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/08/c.html#comment-505</link>
		<dc:creator>Yves Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 01:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/08/central-bank-efforts-to-stabilize-money-markets-may-not-be-working/#comment-505</guid>
		<description>Jim,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;You&#039;d need more data than I have ready access to in order to answer that question.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The question is whether these credit lines are adequately priced, given that the market has said that they think the collateral behind asset backed CP is no good.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Banks at least historically have regarded those lines as  marginal to unprofitable (they are a plain vanilla product, usually offered not in isolation but as part of a larger banking relationship). &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;And I am most certainly NOT up on the terms of those agreements, but I suspect they can&#039;t be repriced (ie, the lender can&#039;t get a higher spread over LIBOR or other reference rate) in the absence of a ratings downgrade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim,</p>
<p>You&#8217;d need more data than I have ready access to in order to answer that question.</p>
<p>The question is whether these credit lines are adequately priced, given that the market has said that they think the collateral behind asset backed CP is no good.</p>
<p>Banks at least historically have regarded those lines as  marginal to unprofitable (they are a plain vanilla product, usually offered not in isolation but as part of a larger banking relationship). </p>
<p>And I am most certainly NOT up on the terms of those agreements, but I suspect they can&#8217;t be repriced (ie, the lender can&#8217;t get a higher spread over LIBOR or other reference rate) in the absence of a ratings downgrade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/08/c.html#comment-504</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 01:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/08/central-bank-efforts-to-stabilize-money-markets-may-not-be-working/#comment-504</guid>
		<description>Is this good news for banks?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Presumably CP borrowers are relatively low risk and back up lines of credit are priced high enough that the borrowers have an economic incentive not to use them?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;So should we assume that banks will be making some attractive risk-adjusted returns?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this good news for banks?</p>
<p>Presumably CP borrowers are relatively low risk and back up lines of credit are priced high enough that the borrowers have an economic incentive not to use them?</p>
<p>So should we assume that banks will be making some attractive risk-adjusted returns?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
