<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Consumer Debt Likely to Become a Negative for Economy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/09/consumer-debt-likely-to-become-negative.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/09/consumer-debt-likely-to-become-negative.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 06:07:28 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Yves Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/09/consumer-debt-likely-to-become-negative.html#comment-906</link>
		<dc:creator>Yves Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 00:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/09/consumer-debt-likely-to-become-a-negative-for-economy/#comment-906</guid>
		<description>BT.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I probably didn&#039;t frame this post properly. What I found somewhat novel about this research is that it claimss a 25 year link between the growth in consumer debt and overall GDP expansion. I don&#039;t know of many studies that assert that consumer debt has played such a long-standing role in growth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BT.</p>
<p>I probably didn&#8217;t frame this post properly. What I found somewhat novel about this research is that it claimss a 25 year link between the growth in consumer debt and overall GDP expansion. I don&#8217;t know of many studies that assert that consumer debt has played such a long-standing role in growth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/09/consumer-debt-likely-to-become-negative.html#comment-898</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 04:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/09/consumer-debt-likely-to-become-a-negative-for-economy/#comment-898</guid>
		<description>i second mbartv,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;also there are thousands of academic research on how consumer behavior (confidence) affects the overall economy, both qualitative and quantitative. Their work contributes  nothing new to the finance field. I love your blog however putting this cr*p as if it&#039;s stg new and as if they catched a different angle is just ridiculous. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Your dedicated reader&lt;br/&gt;BT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i second mbartv,</p>
<p>also there are thousands of academic research on how consumer behavior (confidence) affects the overall economy, both qualitative and quantitative. Their work contributes  nothing new to the finance field. I love your blog however putting this cr*p as if it&#8217;s stg new and as if they catched a different angle is just ridiculous. </p>
<p>Your dedicated reader<br />BT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mbartv</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/09/consumer-debt-likely-to-become-negative.html#comment-893</link>
		<dc:creator>mbartv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 15:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/09/consumer-debt-likely-to-become-a-negative-for-economy/#comment-893</guid>
		<description>The re-iteration that construction constitutes 5% of the economy (from GDP statistics) understates the much greater employment and multiplier effects when you consider the real estate industry as a whole (including re-sales, mortgages, furniture, legal etc.)  In Florida and California particularly real estate is the dominant industry, and its extremely significant in other markets as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The re-iteration that construction constitutes 5% of the economy (from GDP statistics) understates the much greater employment and multiplier effects when you consider the real estate industry as a whole (including re-sales, mortgages, furniture, legal etc.)  In Florida and California particularly real estate is the dominant industry, and its extremely significant in other markets as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
