<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Housing Market Continues to Deteriorate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/09/housing-market-continues-to-deteriorate.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/09/housing-market-continues-to-deteriorate.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:08:53 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Yves Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/09/housing-market-continues-to-deteriorate.html#comment-958</link>
		<dc:creator>Yves Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 04:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/09/housing-market-continues-to-deteriorate/#comment-958</guid>
		<description>Anon of 3:29 PM,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The reason for showing the Shedlock charts wasn&#039;t to make a statement about the cause of this housing recession vs. the one in the early 1990s, but their relative severity. This one clearly looks to be far worse.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Anon of 4:44 PM.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I assume you mean the Shedlock charts, since there are links for the other citations. Frankly, I don&#039;t know where he got it from (his original post doesn&#039;t indicate a source) so you might e-mail him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anon of 3:29 PM,</p>
<p>The reason for showing the Shedlock charts wasn&#8217;t to make a statement about the cause of this housing recession vs. the one in the early 1990s, but their relative severity. This one clearly looks to be far worse.</p>
<p>Anon of 4:44 PM.</p>
<p>I assume you mean the Shedlock charts, since there are links for the other citations. Frankly, I don&#8217;t know where he got it from (his original post doesn&#8217;t indicate a source) so you might e-mail him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/09/housing-market-continues-to-deteriorate.html#comment-956</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 20:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/09/housing-market-continues-to-deteriorate/#comment-956</guid>
		<description>Can you tell me where I can find this data ?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you tell me where I can find this data ?</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/09/housing-market-continues-to-deteriorate.html#comment-946</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 19:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/09/housing-market-continues-to-deteriorate/#comment-946</guid>
		<description>I agree the final chart is interesting, but I think there were differences in the overall economic context in the 80s/90s.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;My impression is that both the early 80s and the 88-92 housing problems were caused by an overall recession (and high interest rates in the early 80s).&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;In this cycle a debt bubble seems to have created the appearance of more demand than was really sustainable.  That caused overbuilding, overpricing, and a big inventory overhang.  In past cycles, it seemed like high interest rates and economic recession triggered a housing problem while inventory was fairly reasonble.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;In this one, it seems like the overbuilding/pricing/bubble-mentality triggered the housing problem on its own.  As the housing problem grew, that began to trigger lower access to home financing and may trigger a recession. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;So, it seems like we are entering the beginning of what traditionally causes a housing problem (financing/recession) from a different initial state ( overbuilt, over inventoried, over priced).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree the final chart is interesting, but I think there were differences in the overall economic context in the 80s/90s.</p>
<p>My impression is that both the early 80s and the 88-92 housing problems were caused by an overall recession (and high interest rates in the early 80s).</p>
<p>In this cycle a debt bubble seems to have created the appearance of more demand than was really sustainable.  That caused overbuilding, overpricing, and a big inventory overhang.  In past cycles, it seemed like high interest rates and economic recession triggered a housing problem while inventory was fairly reasonble.</p>
<p>In this one, it seems like the overbuilding/pricing/bubble-mentality triggered the housing problem on its own.  As the housing problem grew, that began to trigger lower access to home financing and may trigger a recession. </p>
<p>So, it seems like we are entering the beginning of what traditionally causes a housing problem (financing/recession) from a different initial state ( overbuilt, over inventoried, over priced).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
