<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s Official: Most Hedge Fund Strategies Lost Money in August</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/09/its-official-most-hedge-fund-strategies.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/09/its-official-most-hedge-fund-strategies.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 13:16:39 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Yves Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/09/its-official-most-hedge-fund-strategies.html#comment-755</link>
		<dc:creator>Yves Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 15:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/09/its-official-most-hedge-fund-strategies-lost-money-in-august/#comment-755</guid>
		<description>I agree you have to take the indices with a grain, maybe even a handful of salt, particularly given that indices for supposedly the same strategy (&quot;event driven&quot;, say) published by different services will show returns that often differ by at least 1%.   Yet these indices are used by fund consultants to analyze performance and make recommendations to institutional investors on which fund to invest in.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Nevertheless, the indices cover a fairly large number of hedge funds, and in aggregate showed a loss for August.  It&#039;s a big enough, even if imperfect, sample so as to be telling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree you have to take the indices with a grain, maybe even a handful of salt, particularly given that indices for supposedly the same strategy (&#8221;event driven&#8221;, say) published by different services will show returns that often differ by at least 1%.   Yet these indices are used by fund consultants to analyze performance and make recommendations to institutional investors on which fund to invest in.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, the indices cover a fairly large number of hedge funds, and in aggregate showed a loss for August.  It&#8217;s a big enough, even if imperfect, sample so as to be telling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/09/its-official-most-hedge-fund-strategies.html#comment-752</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 12:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/09/its-official-most-hedge-fund-strategies-lost-money-in-august/#comment-752</guid>
		<description>I am very sceptical of these hegde fund indices - bear in mind that one index provider categorized a leveraged long structured credit strategy as &quot;fixed income arb&quot;.  So who knows what they lumped in with global macro?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am very sceptical of these hegde fund indices &#8211; bear in mind that one index provider categorized a leveraged long structured credit strategy as &#8220;fixed income arb&#8221;.  So who knows what they lumped in with global macro?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
