<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Companies That Make Buybacks Lag the Market</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/10/companies-that-make-buybacks-lag-market.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/10/companies-that-make-buybacks-lag-market.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 13:46:25 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/10/companies-that-make-buybacks-lag-market.html#comment-1054</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 03:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/10/companies-that-make-buybacks-lag-the-market/#comment-1054</guid>
		<description>a big reason it&#039;s underperforming is because it&#039;s overweight small/mid caps &amp; consumer discretionary, which are dependent on a weakening US consumer; they aren&#039;t benefiting from global growth.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;http://www.powershares.com/products/overview.aspx?ticker=pkw#sector&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;but i agree with you, long term stock returns have been dependent on consistent and rising dividends. i guess this is what happens when major shareholders are increasingly activist hedge funds...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a big reason it&#8217;s underperforming is because it&#8217;s overweight small/mid caps &#038; consumer discretionary, which are dependent on a weakening US consumer; they aren&#8217;t benefiting from global growth.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.powershares.com/products/overview.aspx?ticker=pkw#sector" rel="nofollow">http://www.powershares.com/products/overview.aspx?ticker=pkw#sector</a></p>
<p>but i agree with you, long term stock returns have been dependent on consistent and rising dividends. i guess this is what happens when major shareholders are increasingly activist hedge funds&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#34;Cassandra&#34;</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/10/companies-that-make-buybacks-lag-market.html#comment-1046</link>
		<dc:creator>&#34;Cassandra&#34;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 13:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/10/companies-that-make-buybacks-lag-the-market/#comment-1046</guid>
		<description>I am personally sympathetic to the more cynical potential meanings represented by such performance.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;But it must be pointed out that in pursuit of fair and balance treatment, its not slam-dunk, for..&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;...investing in your own shares primes the possibility of stock-for-stock acquisitions on terms more favorable than those prevailing under an even more-languishing stock price sans buyback. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Also, the feedback mechanisms of negative price momentum are vicious: lower market cap = lower index representation = lower passive ownership = excretion from the larger index to the smaller index. Then, the firm (and shareholders) are really exposed to lowball opportunistic bids from trade-buying compets, MBO, or PE. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Also, there is undoubtedl a mixing of firms cynically pursuing financial engineering - i.e. some form of leveraged recaps - from those attempting to return fund to shareholders through buybacks. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Finally, in such studies of underperformance (without pre-judging the results), one needs to control very carefully for growth rates, industry group and other important potentially descriptive factors since the firms conducting buybacks themselves may be a biased subset of low-growth comapnies and/or industries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am personally sympathetic to the more cynical potential meanings represented by such performance.</p>
<p>But it must be pointed out that in pursuit of fair and balance treatment, its not slam-dunk, for..</p>
<p>&#8230;investing in your own shares primes the possibility of stock-for-stock acquisitions on terms more favorable than those prevailing under an even more-languishing stock price sans buyback. </p>
<p>Also, the feedback mechanisms of negative price momentum are vicious: lower market cap = lower index representation = lower passive ownership = excretion from the larger index to the smaller index. Then, the firm (and shareholders) are really exposed to lowball opportunistic bids from trade-buying compets, MBO, or PE. </p>
<p>Also, there is undoubtedl a mixing of firms cynically pursuing financial engineering &#8211; i.e. some form of leveraged recaps &#8211; from those attempting to return fund to shareholders through buybacks. </p>
<p>Finally, in such studies of underperformance (without pre-judging the results), one needs to control very carefully for growth rates, industry group and other important potentially descriptive factors since the firms conducting buybacks themselves may be a biased subset of low-growth comapnies and/or industries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/10/companies-that-make-buybacks-lag-market.html#comment-1045</link>
		<dc:creator>a</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 06:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/10/companies-that-make-buybacks-lag-the-market/#comment-1045</guid>
		<description>Another reasons for buybacks rather than dividends:  options.  To put it simply, a call option&#039;s price is inversely related to the amount of dividends paid out between now and the option&#039;s expiry; on the other hand, increasing the stock price increases the value of the option.  So managment invested with lots of options has more incentive to do buybacks than to pay out a dividend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another reasons for buybacks rather than dividends:  options.  To put it simply, a call option&#8217;s price is inversely related to the amount of dividends paid out between now and the option&#8217;s expiry; on the other hand, increasing the stock price increases the value of the option.  So managment invested with lots of options has more incentive to do buybacks than to pay out a dividend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
