<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Fictitious Government Statistics (4.9% GDP Growth Edition)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/11/on-fictitious-government-statistics-49.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/11/on-fictitious-government-statistics-49.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 07:56:24 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/11/on-fictitious-government-statistics-49.html#comment-1984</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 02:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/11/on-fictitious-government-statistics-49-gdp-growth-edition/#comment-1984</guid>
		<description>&quot; The main difference between the two gauges last quarter was corporate profits, which GDI includes and GDP excludes. Corporate profits from current production fell last quarter. GDI also doesn’t explicitly include net exports and inventories, as GDP does. GDI, in contrast, relies more heavily on employee compensation data. &quot;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Gee. I&#039;m glad we got that straight.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Not a particularly robust analysis from these sources.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; The main difference between the two gauges last quarter was corporate profits, which GDI includes and GDP excludes. Corporate profits from current production fell last quarter. GDI also doesn’t explicitly include net exports and inventories, as GDP does. GDI, in contrast, relies more heavily on employee compensation data. &#8220;</p>
<p>Gee. I&#8217;m glad we got that straight.</p>
<p>Not a particularly robust analysis from these sources.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Independent Accountant</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/11/on-fictitious-government-statistics-49.html#comment-1983</link>
		<dc:creator>Independent Accountant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 01:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/11/on-fictitious-government-statistics-49-gdp-growth-edition/#comment-1983</guid>
		<description>I concluded the CPI was &quot;fixed&quot; about a decade ago.  Remember the Boskin Commission in about 1997 which reduced the CPI by 1.3% annually?  I guess the CPI UNDERSTATES inflation by about 2-3% per year.  Therefore the GDP numbers are similarly overstated.  The inflation statistics are a joke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I concluded the CPI was &#8220;fixed&#8221; about a decade ago.  Remember the Boskin Commission in about 1997 which reduced the CPI by 1.3% annually?  I guess the CPI UNDERSTATES inflation by about 2-3% per year.  Therefore the GDP numbers are similarly overstated.  The inflation statistics are a joke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
