<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Surfer Comes Up With New Theory of Everything</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/11/surfer-comes-up-with-new-theory-of.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/11/surfer-comes-up-with-new-theory-of.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:21:03 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/11/surfer-comes-up-with-new-theory-of.html#comment-1696</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 17:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/11/surfer-comes-up-with-new-theory-of-everything/#comment-1696</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s certainly no spoof, although of course it remains to be seen if it&#039;s true.  New Scientist is reporting on it, see http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg19626303.900 , and they&#039;re a highly respectable science magazine (not a scientific journal that publishes original research, but a popular science magazine that reports about such research.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;There are several reasons to be excited about this theory: it may make predictions which are likely to be experimentally testable in the near future, it includes gravity along with other forces (the elusive holy grail for any &quot;theory of everything&quot;), and best of all it&#039;s simple and elegant (although this may not be immediately apparent or accessible to laypersons).&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Simplicity and elegance are not merely some kind of aesthetic preference: time and again, simple and elegant mathematics has been found to be &quot;unreasonably effective&quot; in explaining the properties of the universe, as Eugene Wigner famously noted (this is merely a well-founded empirical observation, though some claim to see in this some mystical or even theological cause).  A theory using simple and elegant math is in a certain sense, therefore, more likely to be true than a cumbersome or kludgey theory.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;John, you&#039;re misunderstanding.  E8 is a &quot;group&quot; (not in the usual English sense of the word, but using the precise mathematical definition of the term).  Group theory is a branch of math that has been very useful in understanding the properties of subatomic particles.  There is no claim being made that space or the universe itself somehow has 248 dimensions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s certainly no spoof, although of course it remains to be seen if it&#8217;s true.  New Scientist is reporting on it, see <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg19626303.900" rel="nofollow">http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg19626303.900</a> , and they&#8217;re a highly respectable science magazine (not a scientific journal that publishes original research, but a popular science magazine that reports about such research.</p>
<p>There are several reasons to be excited about this theory: it may make predictions which are likely to be experimentally testable in the near future, it includes gravity along with other forces (the elusive holy grail for any &#8220;theory of everything&#8221;), and best of all it&#8217;s simple and elegant (although this may not be immediately apparent or accessible to laypersons).</p>
<p>Simplicity and elegance are not merely some kind of aesthetic preference: time and again, simple and elegant mathematics has been found to be &#8220;unreasonably effective&#8221; in explaining the properties of the universe, as Eugene Wigner famously noted (this is merely a well-founded empirical observation, though some claim to see in this some mystical or even theological cause).  A theory using simple and elegant math is in a certain sense, therefore, more likely to be true than a cumbersome or kludgey theory.</p>
<p>John, you&#8217;re misunderstanding.  E8 is a &#8220;group&#8221; (not in the usual English sense of the word, but using the precise mathematical definition of the term).  Group theory is a branch of math that has been very useful in understanding the properties of subatomic particles.  There is no claim being made that space or the universe itself somehow has 248 dimensions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/11/surfer-comes-up-with-new-theory-of.html#comment-1695</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 16:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/11/surfer-comes-up-with-new-theory-of-everything/#comment-1695</guid>
		<description>The only theory of everything will be centered around the theory of balance of general balances .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only theory of everything will be centered around the theory of balance of general balances .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/11/surfer-comes-up-with-new-theory-of.html#comment-1688</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 12:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/11/surfer-comes-up-with-new-theory-of-everything/#comment-1688</guid>
		<description>I saw this yesterday.&lt;br/&gt;I suspect it&#039;s a spoof, viz:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;i&gt;Even better, it does not require more than one dimension of time and three of space, when some rival theories need ten or even more spatial dimensions and other bizarre concepts.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;and:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;i&gt;E8 encapsulates the symmetries of a geometric object that is 57-dimensional and is itself is 248-dimensional. Lisi says &quot;I think our universe is this beautiful shape.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;So which is it?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw this yesterday.<br />I suspect it&#8217;s a spoof, viz:</p>
<p><i>Even better, it does not require more than one dimension of time and three of space, when some rival theories need ten or even more spatial dimensions and other bizarre concepts.</i></p>
<p>and:</p>
<p><i>E8 encapsulates the symmetries of a geometric object that is 57-dimensional and is itself is 248-dimensional. Lisi says &#8220;I think our universe is this beautiful shape.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>So which is it?</p>
<p>John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: burnside</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/11/surfer-comes-up-with-new-theory-of.html#comment-1687</link>
		<dc:creator>burnside</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 11:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/11/surfer-comes-up-with-new-theory-of-everything/#comment-1687</guid>
		<description>Yves, I&#039;d never have seen this if you hadn&#039;t posted. While I don&#039;t imagine string will go down without a fight, LHC will test initial proofs soon enough. Lisi may be quite a while filling blanks or satisfying objections. But c&#039;est normal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yves, I&#8217;d never have seen this if you hadn&#8217;t posted. While I don&#8217;t imagine string will go down without a fight, LHC will test initial proofs soon enough. Lisi may be quite a while filling blanks or satisfying objections. But c&#8217;est normal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/11/surfer-comes-up-with-new-theory-of.html#comment-1684</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 08:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/11/surfer-comes-up-with-new-theory-of-everything/#comment-1684</guid>
		<description>Marcia&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Way to go bro! literally!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marcia</p>
<p>Way to go bro! literally!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/11/surfer-comes-up-with-new-theory-of.html#comment-1683</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 07:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/11/surfer-comes-up-with-new-theory-of-everything/#comment-1683</guid>
		<description>What we take for granted come sometimes as a surprise and for one; not so many physicist&lt;br/&gt;Understand the theory of relativity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What we take for granted come sometimes as a surprise and for one; not so many physicist<br />Understand the theory of relativity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
