<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BofA to Get Big Tax Bennies on Countrywide Purchase (and Critiques of the Deal)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/01/bofa-to-get-big-tax-bennies-on.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/01/bofa-to-get-big-tax-bennies-on.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:04:35 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hubert</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/01/bofa-to-get-big-tax-bennies-on.html#comment-2973</link>
		<dc:creator>Hubert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 15:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/01/bofa-to-get-big-tax-bennies-on-countrywide-purchase-and-critiques-of-the-deal/#comment-2973</guid>
		<description>If there was a masterplan within BAC (what I very much doubt) it might have looked this way:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Acquire preferred stake, get Inside View, decide to take over, let the market wait, write all the credit insurance on CFC you can sell, and then take out shareholders shortly before a filing.&lt;br/&gt;Still this does not eliminate legal risks which could be substantial.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;MOre plausible: Maybe BAC had written too much credit insurance on CFC before and confronted with paying out billions for CFC defaulting they calculated it would be cheaper to take over....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there was a masterplan within BAC (what I very much doubt) it might have looked this way:</p>
<p>Acquire preferred stake, get Inside View, decide to take over, let the market wait, write all the credit insurance on CFC you can sell, and then take out shareholders shortly before a filing.<br />Still this does not eliminate legal risks which could be substantial.</p>
<p>MOre plausible: Maybe BAC had written too much credit insurance on CFC before and confronted with paying out billions for CFC defaulting they calculated it would be cheaper to take over&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/01/bofa-to-get-big-tax-bennies-on.html#comment-2970</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 10:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/01/bofa-to-get-big-tax-bennies-on-countrywide-purchase-and-critiques-of-the-deal/#comment-2970</guid>
		<description>the real motivation behind BAC&#039;s acquisition of countrywide could be hidden on BAC&#039;s off balance sheet&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;BAC&#039;s may have huge derivative exposure to Countrywide through CDOs and CDSs&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Letting Countrywide default would have been disastrous and resulted in additional stress for BAC and financials more generally&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;BAC may be secretly averaging down...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the real motivation behind BAC&#8217;s acquisition of countrywide could be hidden on BAC&#8217;s off balance sheet</p>
<p>BAC&#8217;s may have huge derivative exposure to Countrywide through CDOs and CDSs</p>
<p>Letting Countrywide default would have been disastrous and resulted in additional stress for BAC and financials more generally</p>
<p>BAC may be secretly averaging down&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/01/bofa-to-get-big-tax-bennies-on.html#comment-2968</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 09:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/01/bofa-to-get-big-tax-bennies-on-countrywide-purchase-and-critiques-of-the-deal/#comment-2968</guid>
		<description>&lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.economist.com/daily/news/displaystory.cfm?story_id=10518640&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The &lt;i&gt;Economist&lt;/i&gt; has an additional angle on this&lt;/a&gt;: apparently, due to an arcane regulatory loophole, acquiring Countrywide will enable BoA to breach the 10% limit on nationwide deposits.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;And naturally, it also has intangible value in currying favor with regulators, by relieving them of a huge headache.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a HREF="http://www.economist.com/daily/news/displaystory.cfm?story_id=10518640" REL="nofollow">The <i>Economist</i> has an additional angle on this</a>: apparently, due to an arcane regulatory loophole, acquiring Countrywide will enable BoA to breach the 10% limit on nationwide deposits.</p>
<p>And naturally, it also has intangible value in currying favor with regulators, by relieving them of a huge headache.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/01/bofa-to-get-big-tax-bennies-on.html#comment-2967</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 07:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/01/bofa-to-get-big-tax-bennies-on-countrywide-purchase-and-critiques-of-the-deal/#comment-2967</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;BofA succeeded in driving away the many of the best [US Trust] account officers, who took customers with them.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Well at least in the case of Countrywide, that won&#039;t be a problem.  The employees who are kept on have nowhere else to go.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The headcount will have to be chopped, they might as well start with the loosest cannons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>BofA succeeded in driving away the many of the best [US Trust] account officers, who took customers with them.</i></p>
<p>Well at least in the case of Countrywide, that won&#8217;t be a problem.  The employees who are kept on have nowhere else to go.  </p>
<p>The headcount will have to be chopped, they might as well start with the loosest cannons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
