<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Further Bank Writedowns: Barclays Says $143 Billion for Bond Insurance; Oliver Wyman Says $300 Billion in General</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/01/further-bank-writedowns-barclays-says.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/01/further-bank-writedowns-barclays-says.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:41:08 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: doc holiday</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/01/further-bank-writedowns-barclays-says.html#comment-3322</link>
		<dc:creator>doc holiday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 20:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/01/further-bank-writedowns-barclays-says-143-billion-for-bond-insurance-oliver-wyman-says-300-billion-in-general/#comment-3322</guid>
		<description>This may seem OT, but this seems to be the next direction that off balance sheet entities is headed, which IMHO, is all about writing off risky investments and then taking losses which are covered up; Buffett just issued a very strange bond, and is it any wonder he is also starting up a rating agency?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;This is a long example, but these babies are unregistered and unregulated and its all about underwriting packaged loans, as in new Fannie, Freddie &amp; Sallie junk into derivatives that are backed by Uncle Sam!&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Custodial Receipts. The Fund may invest in custodial receipts which are interests in separately traded interest and principal component parts of US government securities that are issued by banks or brokerage firms and are created by depositing US government securities into a special account at a custodian bank. The custodian holds the interest and principal payments for the benefit of the registered owners of the certificates or receipts. The custodian arranges for the issuance of the certificates or receipts evidencing ownership and maintains the register. Custodial receipts include Treasury Receipts (“TRs”), Treasury Investment Growth Receipts (“TIGRs”), and Certificates of Accrual on&lt;br/&gt; &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Treasury Securities (“CATS”). TIGRs and CATS are interests in private proprietary accounts while TRs and STRIPS are interests in accounts sponsored by the US Treasury. Receipts are sold as zero coupon securities. See “Zero Coupon Securities and Deferred Interest Bonds and Deferred Interest Bonds.”&lt;br/&gt;The Fund may acquire US government securities and their unmatured interest coupons that have been separated (“stripped”) by their holder, typically a custodian bank or investment brokerage firm. Having separated the interest coupons from the underlying principal of the US government securities, the holder will resell the stripped securities in custodial receipt programs with a number of different names, including TIGRs, and CATS. The stripped coupons are sold separately from the underlying principal, which is usually sold at a deep discount because the buyer receives only the right to receive a future fixed payment on the security and does not receive any rights to periodic interest (cash) payments. The underlying US Treasury bonds and notes themselves are generally held in book-entry form at a Federal Reserve Bank. Counsel to the underwriters of these certificates or other evidences of ownership of US Treasury securities have stated that, in their opinion, purchasers of the stripped securities most likely will be deemed the beneficial holders of the underlying US government securities for federal tax and securities purposes. In the case of CATS and TIGRS, the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) has reached this conclusion for the purpose of applying the tax diversification requirements applicable to regulated investment companies such as the Fund. CATS and TIGRS are not considered US government securities by the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Further, the IRS conclusion noted above is contained only in a general counsel memorandum, which is an internal document of no precedential value or binding effect, and a private letter ruling, which also may not be relied upon by the Fund. The Trust is not aware of any binding legislative, judicial or administrative authority on this issue.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Sorry if this is too much or too OT, but Im not offended if you delete it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This may seem OT, but this seems to be the next direction that off balance sheet entities is headed, which IMHO, is all about writing off risky investments and then taking losses which are covered up; Buffett just issued a very strange bond, and is it any wonder he is also starting up a rating agency?</p>
<p>This is a long example, but these babies are unregistered and unregulated and its all about underwriting packaged loans, as in new Fannie, Freddie &#038; Sallie junk into derivatives that are backed by Uncle Sam!</p>
<p>Custodial Receipts. The Fund may invest in custodial receipts which are interests in separately traded interest and principal component parts of US government securities that are issued by banks or brokerage firms and are created by depositing US government securities into a special account at a custodian bank. The custodian holds the interest and principal payments for the benefit of the registered owners of the certificates or receipts. The custodian arranges for the issuance of the certificates or receipts evidencing ownership and maintains the register. Custodial receipts include Treasury Receipts (“TRs”), Treasury Investment Growth Receipts (“TIGRs”), and Certificates of Accrual on</p>
<p>Treasury Securities (“CATS”). TIGRs and CATS are interests in private proprietary accounts while TRs and STRIPS are interests in accounts sponsored by the US Treasury. Receipts are sold as zero coupon securities. See “Zero Coupon Securities and Deferred Interest Bonds and Deferred Interest Bonds.”<br />The Fund may acquire US government securities and their unmatured interest coupons that have been separated (“stripped”) by their holder, typically a custodian bank or investment brokerage firm. Having separated the interest coupons from the underlying principal of the US government securities, the holder will resell the stripped securities in custodial receipt programs with a number of different names, including TIGRs, and CATS. The stripped coupons are sold separately from the underlying principal, which is usually sold at a deep discount because the buyer receives only the right to receive a future fixed payment on the security and does not receive any rights to periodic interest (cash) payments. The underlying US Treasury bonds and notes themselves are generally held in book-entry form at a Federal Reserve Bank. Counsel to the underwriters of these certificates or other evidences of ownership of US Treasury securities have stated that, in their opinion, purchasers of the stripped securities most likely will be deemed the beneficial holders of the underlying US government securities for federal tax and securities purposes. In the case of CATS and TIGRS, the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) has reached this conclusion for the purpose of applying the tax diversification requirements applicable to regulated investment companies such as the Fund. CATS and TIGRS are not considered US government securities by the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Further, the IRS conclusion noted above is contained only in a general counsel memorandum, which is an internal document of no precedential value or binding effect, and a private letter ruling, which also may not be relied upon by the Fund. The Trust is not aware of any binding legislative, judicial or administrative authority on this issue.</p>
<p>Sorry if this is too much or too OT, but Im not offended if you delete it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
