<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Judges Catching on to Countrywide&#8217;s Policy of &quot;Mistakes&quot;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/01/judges-catching-on-to-countrywides.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/01/judges-catching-on-to-countrywides.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 02:08:55 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: craig</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/01/judges-catching-on-to-countrywides.html#comment-3064</link>
		<dc:creator>craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 05:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/01/judges-catching-on-to-countrywides-policy-of-mistakes/#comment-3064</guid>
		<description>Yep, and and it will continue. The Roberts court says its OK with them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, and and it will continue. The Roberts court says its OK with them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/01/judges-catching-on-to-countrywides.html#comment-3048</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 17:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/01/judges-catching-on-to-countrywides-policy-of-mistakes/#comment-3048</guid>
		<description>On the pervasiveness of outrageous business practices:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;From NYTimes 1/15/08&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&quot;In dissent, Justice John Paul Stevens asserted that the majority had gone way beyond the boundaries of the 1994 Central Bank ruling, largely because &lt;b&gt;Scientific-Atlanta and Motorola had clearly engaged in a fraud&lt;/b&gt;, unlike the defendant in the 1994 case.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the pervasiveness of outrageous business practices:</p>
<p>From NYTimes 1/15/08</p>
<p>&#8220;In dissent, Justice John Paul Stevens asserted that the majority had gone way beyond the boundaries of the 1994 Central Bank ruling, largely because <b>Scientific-Atlanta and Motorola had clearly engaged in a fraud</b>, unlike the defendant in the 1994 case.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tedb</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/01/judges-catching-on-to-countrywides.html#comment-3046</link>
		<dc:creator>tedb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/01/judges-catching-on-to-countrywides-policy-of-mistakes/#comment-3046</guid>
		<description>Yves, Thanks for your aside about the corrupt practices of your health insurer.  Last year I had to object 5 times when my health insurer tried to claim co-pays for services that are supposed to be covered 100%.  The money involved in each instance was trivial, but the overall impact across their client base is probably millions of dollars.  The insurance company conceded I was right 4 out of 5 times, and I dropped the last protest because it wasn&#039;t worth my time to continue fighting for $9.12.  My significant other currently has an appeal in process with the same insurer; they told her that a provider was a member of the plan and then denied the claim because she saw him at clinic A instead of clinic B.  If they persist in denying this claim, the Minnesota attorney general&#039;s office will hear about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yves, Thanks for your aside about the corrupt practices of your health insurer.  Last year I had to object 5 times when my health insurer tried to claim co-pays for services that are supposed to be covered 100%.  The money involved in each instance was trivial, but the overall impact across their client base is probably millions of dollars.  The insurance company conceded I was right 4 out of 5 times, and I dropped the last protest because it wasn&#8217;t worth my time to continue fighting for $9.12.  My significant other currently has an appeal in process with the same insurer; they told her that a provider was a member of the plan and then denied the claim because she saw him at clinic A instead of clinic B.  If they persist in denying this claim, the Minnesota attorney general&#8217;s office will hear about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/01/judges-catching-on-to-countrywides.html#comment-3014</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 23:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/01/judges-catching-on-to-countrywides-policy-of-mistakes/#comment-3014</guid>
		<description>Let me share another &quot;mistake&quot; Countrywide made; they purchased my mortgage from First Horizon and then started the 360 months over .... I had already made payments to First Horizon on the regular mortgage after it had converted from a construction loan, but Countrywide says no ... now I am trying to get their mistake straightened out ... and will likely have to do amended tax returns for 2005 &amp; 2006 if I can get my payments corrected on the actual balance I should have had ... I nor others have a choice when a loan is sold or another entity starts servicing it ....  and no one will tell me who actually owns the loan ... no body seems to know.  Glad they died.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me share another &#8220;mistake&#8221; Countrywide made; they purchased my mortgage from First Horizon and then started the 360 months over &#8230;. I had already made payments to First Horizon on the regular mortgage after it had converted from a construction loan, but Countrywide says no &#8230; now I am trying to get their mistake straightened out &#8230; and will likely have to do amended tax returns for 2005 &#038; 2006 if I can get my payments corrected on the actual balance I should have had &#8230; I nor others have a choice when a loan is sold or another entity starts servicing it &#8230;.  and no one will tell me who actually owns the loan &#8230; no body seems to know.  Glad they died.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
