<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Links and Quick Takes 1/13/08</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/01/links-and-quick-takes-11308.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/01/links-and-quick-takes-11308.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:52:37 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: newsman</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/01/links-and-quick-takes-11308.html#comment-2983</link>
		<dc:creator>newsman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/01/links-and-quick-takes-11308/#comment-2983</guid>
		<description>Re the China/Taiwan developments.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;To get a better understanding of Chinese economic policy, read James Fallows in the current Atlantic, which is subscription-only...&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;He gives a clear explanation of how the Chinese government controls the flow of Chinese trade surplus dollars back to the United States. Repeat: the govt does not just regulate this flow--it CONTROLS it. Completely. The on-off switch to the U.S. economy is under the thumb of the Peking government. That government has vastly more power over our economy than Ben Bernanke could dream of.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Of course, we take comfort in the fact that the Chinese could not disrupt our economy without disrupting their own. Fallows compares it to the &quot;mutual assured destruction&quot; that kept the U.S. and the Soviet Union from nuking each other. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I would find this situation a lot MORE comforting if I were not currently reading a biography of Mao (by Jung Chang and Jon Halliday) explaining how Mao was willing to starve his own people by the millions to achieve his economic and political goals. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Yes, Mao is long gone. But the regime he established rules yet. Not to say they are capable of similarly destructive policies--but they might be. Their priorities--their calculus of costs vs. benefits--could be far different than ours.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;We do have a bad habit of assuming that people and leaders in different cultures want what we want.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re the China/Taiwan developments.</p>
<p>To get a better understanding of Chinese economic policy, read James Fallows in the current Atlantic, which is subscription-only&#8230;</p>
<p>He gives a clear explanation of how the Chinese government controls the flow of Chinese trade surplus dollars back to the United States. Repeat: the govt does not just regulate this flow&#8211;it CONTROLS it. Completely. The on-off switch to the U.S. economy is under the thumb of the Peking government. That government has vastly more power over our economy than Ben Bernanke could dream of.</p>
<p>Of course, we take comfort in the fact that the Chinese could not disrupt our economy without disrupting their own. Fallows compares it to the &#8220;mutual assured destruction&#8221; that kept the U.S. and the Soviet Union from nuking each other. </p>
<p>I would find this situation a lot MORE comforting if I were not currently reading a biography of Mao (by Jung Chang and Jon Halliday) explaining how Mao was willing to starve his own people by the millions to achieve his economic and political goals. </p>
<p>Yes, Mao is long gone. But the regime he established rules yet. Not to say they are capable of similarly destructive policies&#8211;but they might be. Their priorities&#8211;their calculus of costs vs. benefits&#8211;could be far different than ours.</p>
<p>We do have a bad habit of assuming that people and leaders in different cultures want what we want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
