<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rich Nations&#8217; Environmental Damage to Third-World Countries Costs Them More Than Foreign Debt</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/01/rich-nations-environmental-damage-costs.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/01/rich-nations-environmental-damage-costs.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:18:14 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/01/rich-nations-environmental-damage-costs.html#comment-3215</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/01/rich-nations-environmental-damage-to-third-world-countries-costs-them-more-than-foreign-debt/#comment-3215</guid>
		<description>&quot;&lt;b&gt;At least to some extent&lt;/b&gt;, the rich nations have developed at the expense of the poor and, &lt;b&gt;in effect&lt;/b&gt;, there is a debt to the poor,&quot; said coauthor Richard B. Norgaard, an ecological economist and UC Berkeley professor of energy and resources. &quot;That, &lt;b&gt;perhaps&lt;/b&gt;, is one reason that they are poor. You don&#039;t see it until you do the kind of accounting that we do here.&quot;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;If this is the kind of cottonmouth talk we get from the good guys I suppose we might just as well pack it in.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I would suggest that these no balls wonders take a lesson from George Orwell on the dangers of watered down speech.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I understand that these academics spend much time licking the back sides of granting agencies so talking straight turkey isn&#039;t a  habit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;<b>At least to some extent</b>, the rich nations have developed at the expense of the poor and, <b>in effect</b>, there is a debt to the poor,&#8221; said coauthor Richard B. Norgaard, an ecological economist and UC Berkeley professor of energy and resources. &#8220;That, <b>perhaps</b>, is one reason that they are poor. You don&#8217;t see it until you do the kind of accounting that we do here.&#8221;</p>
<p>If this is the kind of cottonmouth talk we get from the good guys I suppose we might just as well pack it in.</p>
<p>I would suggest that these no balls wonders take a lesson from George Orwell on the dangers of watered down speech.</p>
<p>I understand that these academics spend much time licking the back sides of granting agencies so talking straight turkey isn&#8217;t a  habit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
