<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &quot;China&#8217;s Inflation Hits American Price Tags&quot;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/02/chinas-inflation-hits-american-price.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/02/chinas-inflation-hits-american-price.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 06:06:33 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Yves Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/02/chinas-inflation-hits-american-price.html#comment-3625</link>
		<dc:creator>Yves Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 21:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/02/chinas-inflation-hits-american-price-tags/#comment-3625</guid>
		<description>Actually, some relevant commentary comes from Nouriel Roubini, in a summary of his paper &quot;&lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/07/nouriel-roubini-on-instability-of.html&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Instability of the Bretton Woods 2 Regime&lt;/a&gt;&quot;:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;i&gt;...membership of BW2 leads to significant financial, monetary and real distortions for its members, most of which have to do with the loss of monetary and credit policy independence that a fixed exchange rate peg entails. These distortions are increasingly taking the form of economic overheating, rising inflation and dangerous asset bubbles.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;China is a paradigmatic BW2 member.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, some relevant commentary comes from Nouriel Roubini, in a summary of his paper &#8220;<a HREF="http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/07/nouriel-roubini-on-instability-of.html" REL="nofollow">The Instability of the Bretton Woods 2 Regime</a>&#8220;:</p>
<p><i>&#8230;membership of BW2 leads to significant financial, monetary and real distortions for its members, most of which have to do with the loss of monetary and credit policy independence that a fixed exchange rate peg entails. These distortions are increasingly taking the form of economic overheating, rising inflation and dangerous asset bubbles.</i></p>
<p>China is a paradigmatic BW2 member.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yves Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/02/chinas-inflation-hits-american-price.html#comment-3621</link>
		<dc:creator>Yves Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 21:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/02/chinas-inflation-hits-american-price-tags/#comment-3621</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t get into sterilization versus non-sterilization issue, incorrectly deeming it to be too technical, although I should have at least alluded to it.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The social unrest resulting from dollar-induced inflation is one of the reasons China is letting the yuan rise. I have not yet tracked it down, but I recall reading Brad Setser saying that it wasn&#039;t clear whether China was sterilizing its Treasury purchases before 2005 (he may actually have said something stronger, as in they likely weren&#039;t). Any past unsterlized Treasury purchases would have led to domestic money supply growth.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;He also said in &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www2.blogger.com/posts.g?blogID=3782644139927778760&amp;label=&amp;searchType=ALL&amp;txtKeywords=sterilization+setser&amp;numPosts=300&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;post this week&lt;/a&gt; that even permitting the currency appreciation, China was currently having trouble sterilizing its Treasury buys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t get into sterilization versus non-sterilization issue, incorrectly deeming it to be too technical, although I should have at least alluded to it.</p>
<p>The social unrest resulting from dollar-induced inflation is one of the reasons China is letting the yuan rise. I have not yet tracked it down, but I recall reading Brad Setser saying that it wasn&#8217;t clear whether China was sterilizing its Treasury purchases before 2005 (he may actually have said something stronger, as in they likely weren&#8217;t). Any past unsterlized Treasury purchases would have led to domestic money supply growth.</p>
<p>He also said in <a HREF="http://www2.blogger.com/posts.g?blogID=3782644139927778760&#038;label=&#038;searchType=ALL&#038;txtKeywords=sterilization+setser&#038;numPosts=300" REL="nofollow">post this week</a> that even permitting the currency appreciation, China was currently having trouble sterilizing its Treasury buys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wprestong</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/02/chinas-inflation-hits-american-price.html#comment-3616</link>
		<dc:creator>wprestong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 18:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/02/chinas-inflation-hits-american-price-tags/#comment-3616</guid>
		<description>anonymous is half right.  The Chinese buy US Treasurys.  But then, in order to control their own money supply, they turn around and sell renminbi-denominated bonds, to suck back the renminbi cash they just put out.  So the net trade is buy US Treasurys, sell renminbi bonds.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;This is called sterilization.  The Japanese also do it.  It is leaky, though.  It does not always work to control the money supply.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Note that it also makes the reserves in the Chinese central bank worse and worse.  I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if the Chinese central bank is the only institution in China that owns no renminbi-denominated bonds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>anonymous is half right.  The Chinese buy US Treasurys.  But then, in order to control their own money supply, they turn around and sell renminbi-denominated bonds, to suck back the renminbi cash they just put out.  So the net trade is buy US Treasurys, sell renminbi bonds.</p>
<p>This is called sterilization.  The Japanese also do it.  It is leaky, though.  It does not always work to control the money supply.</p>
<p>Note that it also makes the reserves in the Chinese central bank worse and worse.  I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if the Chinese central bank is the only institution in China that owns no renminbi-denominated bonds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/02/chinas-inflation-hits-american-price.html#comment-3605</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/02/chinas-inflation-hits-american-price-tags/#comment-3605</guid>
		<description>The Chinese peg their currency to the US$. Therefore, they must buy (support) the $&#039;s fall by buying Treasuries.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Those Treasuries then become the reserves undergirding China&#039;s monetary base.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Chinese peg their currency to the US$. Therefore, they must buy (support) the $&#8217;s fall by buying Treasuries.</p>
<p>Those Treasuries then become the reserves undergirding China&#8217;s monetary base.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Felix</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/02/chinas-inflation-hits-american-price.html#comment-3604</link>
		<dc:creator>Felix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 13:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/02/chinas-inflation-hits-american-price-tags/#comment-3604</guid>
		<description>Yves, I think you&#039;re exactly wrong on this one. The purchases of dollars aren&#039;t a monetary stimulus -- how can buying Treasury bonds increase the Chinese money supply? Quite the opposite: they&#039;re an attempt to sterilize all those dollar inflows, and *prevent* inflation. If China allowed its exporters to simply spend all the dollars they&#039;re earning, *that* would be inflationary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yves, I think you&#8217;re exactly wrong on this one. The purchases of dollars aren&#8217;t a monetary stimulus &#8212; how can buying Treasury bonds increase the Chinese money supply? Quite the opposite: they&#8217;re an attempt to sterilize all those dollar inflows, and *prevent* inflation. If China allowed its exporters to simply spend all the dollars they&#8217;re earning, *that* would be inflationary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
