<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chinese Think Globalization Happening Too Quickly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/02/chinese-think-globalization-happening.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/02/chinese-think-globalization-happening.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:17:20 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/02/chinese-think-globalization-happening.html#comment-3813</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/02/chinese-think-globalization-happening-too-quickly/#comment-3813</guid>
		<description>My Take&lt;br/&gt;Blaming foreigners is always an easy one for people to accept.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Also, envy is natural (but wrong) although china is not alone where the politically connected (often the rich) do get the benefit of regulations and tax dollars.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Surprise, surprise- freedom is blamed for problems created by government. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;But another wrinkle is that what people are calling free trade is nothing but.  Does anybody really think NAFTA, an agreement of 3000 pages doesnt benefit one person/firm over another?  Thats not free trade.  Im guessing this same thing happens with all &quot;free trade&quot; agreements across the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My Take<br />Blaming foreigners is always an easy one for people to accept.</p>
<p>Also, envy is natural (but wrong) although china is not alone where the politically connected (often the rich) do get the benefit of regulations and tax dollars.</p>
<p>Surprise, surprise- freedom is blamed for problems created by government. </p>
<p>But another wrinkle is that what people are calling free trade is nothing but.  Does anybody really think NAFTA, an agreement of 3000 pages doesnt benefit one person/firm over another?  Thats not free trade.  Im guessing this same thing happens with all &#8220;free trade&#8221; agreements across the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maoist</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/02/chinese-think-globalization-happening.html#comment-3798</link>
		<dc:creator>Maoist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 06:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/02/chinese-think-globalization-happening-too-quickly/#comment-3798</guid>
		<description>For those Chinese people, BBC should have added one more question: &quot;Perception of Pace of Capitalism&quot;.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The fact is that there is NO definition of  &quot;ownership&quot; in Chinese law, as current law is derived from communism, where everything was owned by the communist party.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Then, suddenly, capitalism started. While mid-class didn&#039;t understand what it meant, those &quot;Elites&quot; in the communist party *declared* the ownership of lands, factories, companies, houses, or funds.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;From the start, there was huge inequality in Chinese capitalism, and rich people kept getting richer while migrant workers have been working like slave.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Now the inequality got worse than it used be when Japan invaded China. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Globalization? It&#039;s not even an issue. China needs fair rules of ownership.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those Chinese people, BBC should have added one more question: &#8220;Perception of Pace of Capitalism&#8221;.</p>
<p>The fact is that there is NO definition of  &#8220;ownership&#8221; in Chinese law, as current law is derived from communism, where everything was owned by the communist party.</p>
<p>Then, suddenly, capitalism started. While mid-class didn&#8217;t understand what it meant, those &#8220;Elites&#8221; in the communist party *declared* the ownership of lands, factories, companies, houses, or funds.</p>
<p>From the start, there was huge inequality in Chinese capitalism, and rich people kept getting richer while migrant workers have been working like slave.</p>
<p>Now the inequality got worse than it used be when Japan invaded China. </p>
<p>Globalization? It&#8217;s not even an issue. China needs fair rules of ownership.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
