<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bill Gross: New Regulation Will Lower Investment Bank Profits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/03/bill-gross-new-regulation-will-lower.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/03/bill-gross-new-regulation-will-lower.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:40:52 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/03/bill-gross-new-regulation-will-lower.html#comment-6156</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 23:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/03/bill-gross-new-regulation-will-lower-investment-bank-profits/#comment-6156</guid>
		<description>It seems like the source of credit crunches historically is increased leverage.  Why doesn&#039;t the system create disincentives for leverage?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;In addition, size does matter with respect to &quot;too large to fail&quot; and moral hazard.  Why not create disincentives on size.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems like the source of credit crunches historically is increased leverage.  Why doesn&#8217;t the system create disincentives for leverage?</p>
<p>In addition, size does matter with respect to &#8220;too large to fail&#8221; and moral hazard.  Why not create disincentives on size.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/03/bill-gross-new-regulation-will-lower.html#comment-6150</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 20:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/03/bill-gross-new-regulation-will-lower-investment-bank-profits/#comment-6150</guid>
		<description>In addition to the above, also worth noting the great reason for FEMA being shuffled under a different pea after it dropped the ball with Katrina!  Same deal here, as you have a system filled with nepotism and idiots that thrive on chaos, so why not mix it up and give them more money to do far less; what would it matter?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In addition to the above, also worth noting the great reason for FEMA being shuffled under a different pea after it dropped the ball with Katrina!  Same deal here, as you have a system filled with nepotism and idiots that thrive on chaos, so why not mix it up and give them more money to do far less; what would it matter?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/03/bill-gross-new-regulation-will-lower.html#comment-6149</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 20:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/03/bill-gross-new-regulation-will-lower-investment-bank-profits/#comment-6149</guid>
		<description>Gross works for a shadow banking conduit, he is full of crap!&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Also see:  &quot;This isn&#039;t going to create a new role for the Fed as some sort of panacea to eliminate what is characterized as systemic risk,&quot; said Michael Zuppone, chair of the securities and capital markets practice at international law firm Paul Hastings.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;He said the current proposal is almost like &quot;creating a homeland security department for the financial services sector.&quot; President Bush created the agency after the terrorist attacks of 2001 by consolidating a number separate security agencies.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The government&#039;s proposal for bank oversight will also string together different agencies. For instance, the plan proposes the merger of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the Securities and Exchange Commission _ blending them to monitor U.S. futures, commodities, and equities markets.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;CFTC acting Chairman Walt Lukken said in a statement that the differences between the two agencies are not accidental, and that trying to &quot;homogenize the two regulatory regimes is certain to cause more harm than good.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gross works for a shadow banking conduit, he is full of crap!</p>
<p>Also see:  &#8220;This isn&#8217;t going to create a new role for the Fed as some sort of panacea to eliminate what is characterized as systemic risk,&#8221; said Michael Zuppone, chair of the securities and capital markets practice at international law firm Paul Hastings.</p>
<p>He said the current proposal is almost like &#8220;creating a homeland security department for the financial services sector.&#8221; President Bush created the agency after the terrorist attacks of 2001 by consolidating a number separate security agencies.</p>
<p>The government&#8217;s proposal for bank oversight will also string together different agencies. For instance, the plan proposes the merger of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the Securities and Exchange Commission _ blending them to monitor U.S. futures, commodities, and equities markets.</p>
<p>CFTC acting Chairman Walt Lukken said in a statement that the differences between the two agencies are not accidental, and that trying to &#8220;homogenize the two regulatory regimes is certain to cause more harm than good.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
