<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Bad News About Bank Earnings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/03/more-bad-news-about-bank-earnings.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/03/more-bad-news-about-bank-earnings.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 14:06:54 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TallIndian</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/03/more-bad-news-about-bank-earnings.html#comment-5891</link>
		<dc:creator>TallIndian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 20:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/03/more-bad-news-about-bank-earnings/#comment-5891</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m hearing that the FED is now rejecting some collateral as worthless for its new credit facilities (TSLF and PDCF) ----&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;copies of the U. S. Constitution</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m hearing that the FED is now rejecting some collateral as worthless for its new credit facilities (TSLF and PDCF) &#8212;-</p>
<p>copies of the U. S. Constitution</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/03/more-bad-news-about-bank-earnings.html#comment-5889</link>
		<dc:creator>S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 19:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/03/more-bad-news-about-bank-earnings/#comment-5889</guid>
		<description>Another 3:15 rally off the bottom...must be all the good news</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another 3:15 rally off the bottom&#8230;must be all the good news</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doc holiday</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/03/more-bad-news-about-bank-earnings.html#comment-5887</link>
		<dc:creator>doc holiday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 15:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/03/more-bad-news-about-bank-earnings/#comment-5887</guid>
		<description>yves, can you comment on the following CR post related to TED and LIBOR and inverted yields (please)&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;As some may recall, there is an inversion in short-term T-bills, i.e, between the 2 and 3 year; however, the 3 year was discontinued last fall, but remains in circulation nonetheless. Thus, when looking at TED with a geometric substitution of The LIBOR versus the historic &quot;normalcy&quot; of the 3 year inflation trend, IMHO, there is a distortion of rate reality:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The 2 year bond rate is @ 1.72&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The 3 year bond rate is @ 1.60&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Three-month sterling LIBOR, the interest rate off which our mortgages and most other loans are priced, has risen to 6%, its highest level since December 28.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Re: Initially, the TED spread was the difference between the interest rate for the three month U.S. Treasuries contract and three month Eurodollars contract as represented by the London Inter Bank Offered Rate (LIBOR). However, since the Chicago Mercantile Exchange dropped the T-bill futures, the TED spread is now calculated as the difference between the T-bill interest rate and LIBOR. The TED spread is a measure of liquidity and shows the flow of dollars into and out of the United States.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yves, can you comment on the following CR post related to TED and LIBOR and inverted yields (please)</p>
<p>As some may recall, there is an inversion in short-term T-bills, i.e, between the 2 and 3 year; however, the 3 year was discontinued last fall, but remains in circulation nonetheless. Thus, when looking at TED with a geometric substitution of The LIBOR versus the historic &#8220;normalcy&#8221; of the 3 year inflation trend, IMHO, there is a distortion of rate reality:</p>
<p>The 2 year bond rate is @ 1.72</p>
<p>The 3 year bond rate is @ 1.60</p>
<p>Three-month sterling LIBOR, the interest rate off which our mortgages and most other loans are priced, has risen to 6%, its highest level since December 28.</p>
<p>Re: Initially, the TED spread was the difference between the interest rate for the three month U.S. Treasuries contract and three month Eurodollars contract as represented by the London Inter Bank Offered Rate (LIBOR). However, since the Chicago Mercantile Exchange dropped the T-bill futures, the TED spread is now calculated as the difference between the T-bill interest rate and LIBOR. The TED spread is a measure of liquidity and shows the flow of dollars into and out of the United States.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/03/more-bad-news-about-bank-earnings.html#comment-5886</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 15:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/03/more-bad-news-about-bank-earnings/#comment-5886</guid>
		<description>Does anyone know whether Whitney&#039;s report is publicly available? If so, where?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone know whether Whitney&#8217;s report is publicly available? If so, where?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/03/more-bad-news-about-bank-earnings.html#comment-5885</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 15:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/03/more-bad-news-about-bank-earnings/#comment-5885</guid>
		<description>Afternoon Reading: The Grassy Knoll of Bear Stearns&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;http://blogs.wsj.com/deals/2008/...ns/? mod=WSJBlog&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;People still wonder whether the Federal Reserve and the Treasury forced J.P. Morgan to offer $2 a share. Yves Smith at Naked Capitalism scoffs at the idea that regulators twisted Jamie Dimon’s arm, such a suggestion “is pretty outrageous spin when the government is putting up taxpayer money.” And he makes a pretty good argument as to why he think that wasn’t the case. Smith also endorses an Institutional Risk Analytics article that says that J.P. Morgan isn’t so financially strong after all. (So there).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Afternoon Reading: The Grassy Knoll of Bear Stearns</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/deals/2008/...ns/?" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.wsj.com/deals/2008/&#8230;ns/?</a> mod=WSJBlog</p>
<p>People still wonder whether the Federal Reserve and the Treasury forced J.P. Morgan to offer $2 a share. Yves Smith at Naked Capitalism scoffs at the idea that regulators twisted Jamie Dimon’s arm, such a suggestion “is pretty outrageous spin when the government is putting up taxpayer money.” And he makes a pretty good argument as to why he think that wasn’t the case. Smith also endorses an Institutional Risk Analytics article that says that J.P. Morgan isn’t so financially strong after all. (So there).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/03/more-bad-news-about-bank-earnings.html#comment-5873</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 13:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/03/more-bad-news-about-bank-earnings/#comment-5873</guid>
		<description>I love how the article tries to blame her for the stock market going down.      She is about the only one actually doing her job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love how the article tries to blame her for the stock market going down.      She is about the only one actually doing her job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/03/more-bad-news-about-bank-earnings.html#comment-5870</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 12:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/03/more-bad-news-about-bank-earnings/#comment-5870</guid>
		<description>Good!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
