<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fitch Downgrades MBIA to AA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/04/fitch-downgrades-mbia-to-aa.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/04/fitch-downgrades-mbia-to-aa.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:38:01 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/04/fitch-downgrades-mbia-to-aa.html#comment-6424</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 21:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/04/fitch-downgrades-mbia-to-aa/#comment-6424</guid>
		<description>MORAL HAZARD AND THE RATINGS AGENCIES&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;If the Fed is going to bail everyone out, why should the ratings agencies worry about downgrading the monolines? Perhaps post Bear downgrading MBIA will be easier, since the Fed will take care of any mess it creates. File this under the heading &quot;unintended consequences&quot; of bailouts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MORAL HAZARD AND THE RATINGS AGENCIES</p>
<p>If the Fed is going to bail everyone out, why should the ratings agencies worry about downgrading the monolines? Perhaps post Bear downgrading MBIA will be easier, since the Fed will take care of any mess it creates. File this under the heading &#8220;unintended consequences&#8221; of bailouts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/04/fitch-downgrades-mbia-to-aa.html#comment-6408</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 08:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/04/fitch-downgrades-mbia-to-aa/#comment-6408</guid>
		<description>Bond &quot;insurance&quot;, especially if the insured bonds are of a homogenous set, like munis, is a ridiculous concept, mathematically. How can it possibly add value? More states, like California, are waking up to the fact that it&#039;s a scam. Give it a few more years and the names MBIA and Ambac won&#039;t be ever mentioned again.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;When California munis auctioned their bonds a month ago, without any stinking MBIA and Ambac leeches, the bids were as high as they have ever been, and munis got a good deal on the interest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bond &#8220;insurance&#8221;, especially if the insured bonds are of a homogenous set, like munis, is a ridiculous concept, mathematically. How can it possibly add value? More states, like California, are waking up to the fact that it&#8217;s a scam. Give it a few more years and the names MBIA and Ambac won&#8217;t be ever mentioned again.</p>
<p>When California munis auctioned their bonds a month ago, without any stinking MBIA and Ambac leeches, the bids were as high as they have ever been, and munis got a good deal on the interest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
