<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Robert Shiller Pushes Fed as Stability Regulator</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/04/robert-shiller-pushes-fed-as-stability.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/04/robert-shiller-pushes-fed-as-stability.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:08:53 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/04/robert-shiller-pushes-fed-as-stability.html#comment-6475</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 23:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/04/robert-shiller-pushes-fed-as-stability-regulator/#comment-6475</guid>
		<description>quoted,&lt;br/&gt;&quot;What were these &quot;Mefo&quot; bonds? Mefo was a contraction of the Metallurgische Forschungs-GmbH (Metallurgic Research Company). With a startup capitalization of one billion marks - which Hitler and Schacht arranged to be provided by the four giant firms of Krupp, Siemens, Deutsche Werke and Rheinmetall -- this company would eventually promote many billions of marks worth of investment.&quot;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Well, unfortunately for us we don&#039;t have any industries that can second as a bank. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Remember, our only export is debt. We print money, we don&#039;t generate it. i.e. record high trade deficit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>quoted,<br />&#8220;What were these &#8220;Mefo&#8221; bonds? Mefo was a contraction of the Metallurgische Forschungs-GmbH (Metallurgic Research Company). With a startup capitalization of one billion marks &#8211; which Hitler and Schacht arranged to be provided by the four giant firms of Krupp, Siemens, Deutsche Werke and Rheinmetall &#8212; this company would eventually promote many billions of marks worth of investment.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, unfortunately for us we don&#8217;t have any industries that can second as a bank. </p>
<p>Remember, our only export is debt. We print money, we don&#8217;t generate it. i.e. record high trade deficit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/04/robert-shiller-pushes-fed-as-stability.html#comment-6470</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/04/robert-shiller-pushes-fed-as-stability-regulator/#comment-6470</guid>
		<description>Opaqueness doesn&#039;t lead to confidence.  It leads to people gaming the system, corruption, and cronyism.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The new goal seems to be about managing expectations.  We seem to be turning Red.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Opaqueness doesn&#8217;t lead to confidence.  It leads to people gaming the system, corruption, and cronyism.</p>
<p>The new goal seems to be about managing expectations.  We seem to be turning Red.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/04/robert-shiller-pushes-fed-as-stability.html#comment-6467</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 18:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/04/robert-shiller-pushes-fed-as-stability-regulator/#comment-6467</guid>
		<description>Re:  &quot;Two of the Feds important recent innovations are {the TAF and the TSLF}.&quot;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Re:  &quot;what the hell happened to Robert Schiller..&quot;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;See: MEFO Bonds and the roots of The Fed:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;An imaginary company&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mefo_bills&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Hjalmar Schacht formed the limited liability company Metallurgische Forschungsgesellschaft, m.b.H., or &quot;MEFO&quot; for short. The company&#039;s &quot;mefo bills&quot; served as bills of exchange, convertible into Reichsmark upon demand. MEFO had no actual existence or operations and was solely a balance sheet entity. The bills were mainly issued as payment to armaments manufacturers.&lt;br/&gt;Mefo bills were issued to last for six months initially, but with the provision for indefinite three-month extensions. The total amount of mefo bills issued was kept secret.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hjalmar_Schacht&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Re:  chacht negotiated several trade agreements with countries in South America, and South-East Europe, ensuring that Germany would continue to receive raw materials from those countries, but that they would be paid in Reichsmarks; thus ensuring that the deficit would not get any worse; whilst allowing the Nazis to deal with the gap which had already developed. Schacht also found an innovative solution to the problem of the government deficit by using mefo bills. He was appointed General Plenipotentiary for the War Economy in May 1934[6] and was awarded honorary membership of the Nazi Party and the Golden Swastika in January 1937.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Schacht had been president of the Reichsbank between 1923 and 1930, but had been dismissed. Now he would return in triumph. He felt vindicated. Within weeks, the ingenious solution to Germany&#039;s pressing financial woes would burst forth from his inventive brain.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&quot;It was necessary,&quot; Schacht later explained, &quot;to discover a method that would avoid inflating the investment holdings of the Reichsbank immoderately and consequently increasing the circulation of money excessively.&quot;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&quot;Therefore,&quot; he went on, &quot;I had to find some means of getting the sums that were lying idle in pockets and banks, without meaning for it to be long term and without having it undergo the risk of depreciation. That was the reasoning behind the Mefo bonds.&quot;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;What were these &quot;Mefo&quot; bonds? Mefo was a contraction of the Metallurgische Forschungs-GmbH (Metallurgic Research Company). With a startup capitalization of one billion marks - which Hitler and Schacht arranged to be provided by the four giant firms of Krupp, Siemens, Deutsche Werke and Rheinmetall -- this company would eventually promote many billions of marks worth of investment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re:  &#8220;Two of the Feds important recent innovations are {the TAF and the TSLF}.&#8221;</p>
<p>Re:  &#8220;what the hell happened to Robert Schiller..&#8221;</p>
<p>See: MEFO Bonds and the roots of The Fed:</p>
<p>An imaginary company</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mefo_bills" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mefo_bills</a></p>
<p>Hjalmar Schacht formed the limited liability company Metallurgische Forschungsgesellschaft, m.b.H., or &#8220;MEFO&#8221; for short. The company&#8217;s &#8220;mefo bills&#8221; served as bills of exchange, convertible into Reichsmark upon demand. MEFO had no actual existence or operations and was solely a balance sheet entity. The bills were mainly issued as payment to armaments manufacturers.<br />Mefo bills were issued to last for six months initially, but with the provision for indefinite three-month extensions. The total amount of mefo bills issued was kept secret.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hjalmar_Schacht" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hjalmar_Schacht</a></p>
<p>Re:  chacht negotiated several trade agreements with countries in South America, and South-East Europe, ensuring that Germany would continue to receive raw materials from those countries, but that they would be paid in Reichsmarks; thus ensuring that the deficit would not get any worse; whilst allowing the Nazis to deal with the gap which had already developed. Schacht also found an innovative solution to the problem of the government deficit by using mefo bills. He was appointed General Plenipotentiary for the War Economy in May 1934[6] and was awarded honorary membership of the Nazi Party and the Golden Swastika in January 1937.</p>
<p>Schacht had been president of the Reichsbank between 1923 and 1930, but had been dismissed. Now he would return in triumph. He felt vindicated. Within weeks, the ingenious solution to Germany&#8217;s pressing financial woes would burst forth from his inventive brain.</p>
<p>&#8220;It was necessary,&#8221; Schacht later explained, &#8220;to discover a method that would avoid inflating the investment holdings of the Reichsbank immoderately and consequently increasing the circulation of money excessively.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Therefore,&#8221; he went on, &#8220;I had to find some means of getting the sums that were lying idle in pockets and banks, without meaning for it to be long term and without having it undergo the risk of depreciation. That was the reasoning behind the Mefo bonds.&#8221;</p>
<p>What were these &#8220;Mefo&#8221; bonds? Mefo was a contraction of the Metallurgische Forschungs-GmbH (Metallurgic Research Company). With a startup capitalization of one billion marks &#8211; which Hitler and Schacht arranged to be provided by the four giant firms of Krupp, Siemens, Deutsche Werke and Rheinmetall &#8212; this company would eventually promote many billions of marks worth of investment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/04/robert-shiller-pushes-fed-as-stability.html#comment-6465</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 15:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/04/robert-shiller-pushes-fed-as-stability-regulator/#comment-6465</guid>
		<description>We can all see that the Fed. isn&#039;t going to solve this disaster. All they are doing is keeping the patient(U.S. economy) on &quot;life support&quot;.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;They&#039;re &quot;stabilizing&quot; the patient while the industrialists &quot;deleverage&quot; [read] get liquid and get the heck out of dodge before its to late.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Uncle Ben&#039;s &quot;big plan&quot; is to maintain this charade long enough for our countries capital to be sucked up and flown away somewhere safe.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;This is going to be the biggest &quot;rip off&quot; of all time. It seems that &quot;globalization&quot; means that the industrial parasites can canabalize their own country. Capital no longer has any boarders or loyalty.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;We are now victims of our own foreign policy. Welcome to Third World status.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We can all see that the Fed. isn&#8217;t going to solve this disaster. All they are doing is keeping the patient(U.S. economy) on &#8220;life support&#8221;.</p>
<p>They&#8217;re &#8220;stabilizing&#8221; the patient while the industrialists &#8220;deleverage&#8221; [read] get liquid and get the heck out of dodge before its to late.</p>
<p>Uncle Ben&#8217;s &#8220;big plan&#8221; is to maintain this charade long enough for our countries capital to be sucked up and flown away somewhere safe.</p>
<p>This is going to be the biggest &#8220;rip off&#8221; of all time. It seems that &#8220;globalization&#8221; means that the industrial parasites can canabalize their own country. Capital no longer has any boarders or loyalty.</p>
<p>We are now victims of our own foreign policy. Welcome to Third World status.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/04/robert-shiller-pushes-fed-as-stability.html#comment-6463</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 14:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/04/robert-shiller-pushes-fed-as-stability-regulator/#comment-6463</guid>
		<description>The Fed has already begun to play this role. And by doing so, it is taking a significant step toward reducing the fundamental instability of our economy.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The only thing they have done for me is force my investments out of a dying currency, and rigged markets, There are simply better places to put ones money and it doesn&#039;t have to be in dollars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Fed has already begun to play this role. And by doing so, it is taking a significant step toward reducing the fundamental instability of our economy.</p>
<p>The only thing they have done for me is force my investments out of a dying currency, and rigged markets, There are simply better places to put ones money and it doesn&#8217;t have to be in dollars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/04/robert-shiller-pushes-fed-as-stability.html#comment-6462</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 13:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/04/robert-shiller-pushes-fed-as-stability-regulator/#comment-6462</guid>
		<description>What the hell happened to Robert Schiller......&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;He has become Col. Kurtz. (Apocolypse now !) Oh, the horror !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What the hell happened to Robert Schiller&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>He has become Col. Kurtz. (Apocolypse now !) Oh, the horror !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RK</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/04/robert-shiller-pushes-fed-as-stability.html#comment-6458</link>
		<dc:creator>RK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 11:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/04/robert-shiller-pushes-fed-as-stability-regulator/#comment-6458</guid>
		<description>When the monkey steals the keys to all the cages in&lt;br/&gt;the zoo, you&#039;re going to have a problem.  In our great&lt;br/&gt;nation, there are a limited number of potential institutions which could exercise authority over those&lt;br/&gt;&quot;monkeys&quot; which have destabilized the financial system, and from the perspective of competence, independence and the possession of a clear understanding of the inter-market linkages, the list is as ugly as it is short.&lt;br/&gt;!. Congress&lt;br/&gt;2. The President&lt;br/&gt;3. The Courts&lt;br/&gt;4. The Treasury&lt;br/&gt;5. The Fed&lt;br/&gt;6. An agency yet to be named&lt;br/&gt;The big problem is that the &quot;monkeys&quot; will ALWAYS &lt;br/&gt;be smarter than 1-4, and ALMOST ALWAYS smarter&lt;br/&gt;than 5-6.  They will also always be wealthier, and &lt;br/&gt;hence more influential, than 1-6, and will find ways&lt;br/&gt;to neuter rules they consider onerous, with a packed Supreme court on their side, should congress or the president fail to support them.    &lt;br/&gt;In the end,  there is only one regulator who can clean up the AUGEAN STABLE.  His name is Mr. Market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the monkey steals the keys to all the cages in<br />the zoo, you&#8217;re going to have a problem.  In our great<br />nation, there are a limited number of potential institutions which could exercise authority over those<br />&#8220;monkeys&#8221; which have destabilized the financial system, and from the perspective of competence, independence and the possession of a clear understanding of the inter-market linkages, the list is as ugly as it is short.<br />!. Congress<br />2. The President<br />3. The Courts<br />4. The Treasury<br />5. The Fed<br />6. An agency yet to be named<br />The big problem is that the &#8220;monkeys&#8221; will ALWAYS <br />be smarter than 1-4, and ALMOST ALWAYS smarter<br />than 5-6.  They will also always be wealthier, and <br />hence more influential, than 1-6, and will find ways<br />to neuter rules they consider onerous, with a packed Supreme court on their side, should congress or the president fail to support them.    <br />In the end,  there is only one regulator who can clean up the AUGEAN STABLE.  His name is Mr. Market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/04/robert-shiller-pushes-fed-as-stability.html#comment-6455</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 07:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/04/robert-shiller-pushes-fed-as-stability-regulator/#comment-6455</guid>
		<description>If the Federal Reserve has clearly proven itself to be a TOTAL failure as a regulator, why would you concentrate yet more regulatory powers into the hands of the Fed?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;They watched while Rome burned.  Where is the accountability for what happened here?  High officials at Fed/Treasury need to be fired.  After all this, they are still admitting nothing and are still being fawned on by the media as our &quot;saviours&quot;.&lt;br/&gt; &lt;br/&gt;The response to the crisis is yet more &quot;deification of the Fed&quot; and its &quot;almighty powers&quot;.  Can our system get any dumber?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the Federal Reserve has clearly proven itself to be a TOTAL failure as a regulator, why would you concentrate yet more regulatory powers into the hands of the Fed?</p>
<p>They watched while Rome burned.  Where is the accountability for what happened here?  High officials at Fed/Treasury need to be fired.  After all this, they are still admitting nothing and are still being fawned on by the media as our &#8220;saviours&#8221;.</p>
<p>The response to the crisis is yet more &#8220;deification of the Fed&#8221; and its &#8220;almighty powers&#8221;.  Can our system get any dumber?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Kline</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/04/robert-shiller-pushes-fed-as-stability.html#comment-6454</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Kline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 07:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/04/robert-shiller-pushes-fed-as-stability-regulator/#comment-6454</guid>
		<description>Regarding Greenspan&#039;s negative real rates in &#039;02-&#039;03, I don&#039;t think he did this simply to avoid &#039;a garden variety recession,&#039; which I agree is what we likely would have had.  I believed then, and do now, that St. Alan went negative because that garden variety recession would have put off and so likely prevented the massive tax cuts for the plutocracy which were his heart&#039;s desire.  Politically, they those cuts couldn&#039;t have been sold in a recession, mild or not, so sane or not steps to put off a recession were necessary.  ---And so Greenspan screwed the public to make sure the tax cut went through.  Probably, he thought he could clean up the mess down the road; he&#039;s that self-inflated, and had &#039;succeeded&#039; before, but he knew what he was doing and why, to my perspective.  If, as may be the case, Greenie only showed nonfeasance and misfeasance in his &#039;failure to regulate&#039; the speculative risks of the financial industry, I am of the view that he most definitely showed malfeasance in his inflate-o-rates.  The failure to regulate was the greater ill, to me, but his dropping money from helicopters to the brokrs and bankers was done to insure the plutocracy could cash in on a once in a century sociopolitical window of stupidity.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;And Shiller wants to give _more_ authority to the inheritor of that office?  . . . &quot;Worked once, didn&#039;t it?  They&#039;re stupid enough to smoke that &#039;xplodin&#039; ceeegar twice, me thinks.  And I get commission!  *clacka-clacka-clacka-ping*&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding Greenspan&#8217;s negative real rates in &#8216;02-&#8217;03, I don&#8217;t think he did this simply to avoid &#8216;a garden variety recession,&#8217; which I agree is what we likely would have had.  I believed then, and do now, that St. Alan went negative because that garden variety recession would have put off and so likely prevented the massive tax cuts for the plutocracy which were his heart&#8217;s desire.  Politically, they those cuts couldn&#8217;t have been sold in a recession, mild or not, so sane or not steps to put off a recession were necessary.  &#8212;And so Greenspan screwed the public to make sure the tax cut went through.  Probably, he thought he could clean up the mess down the road; he&#8217;s that self-inflated, and had &#8217;succeeded&#8217; before, but he knew what he was doing and why, to my perspective.  If, as may be the case, Greenie only showed nonfeasance and misfeasance in his &#8216;failure to regulate&#8217; the speculative risks of the financial industry, I am of the view that he most definitely showed malfeasance in his inflate-o-rates.  The failure to regulate was the greater ill, to me, but his dropping money from helicopters to the brokrs and bankers was done to insure the plutocracy could cash in on a once in a century sociopolitical window of stupidity.  </p>
<p>And Shiller wants to give _more_ authority to the inheritor of that office?  . . . &#8220;Worked once, didn&#8217;t it?  They&#8217;re stupid enough to smoke that &#8216;xplodin&#8217; ceeegar twice, me thinks.  And I get commission!  *clacka-clacka-clacka-ping*&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Kline</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/04/robert-shiller-pushes-fed-as-stability.html#comment-6451</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Kline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 07:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/04/robert-shiller-pushes-fed-as-stability-regulator/#comment-6451</guid>
		<description>*AARRRGHH*  What a stiff-the-stupid-proles shillfest.  What isn&#039;t redefinition smoke in this piece is &#039;sign here, my good man&#039; snake oil.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&quot;. . . [The]nature of financial institutions is changing . . . the traditional boundaries of banking have blurred . . . In the new financial order, in fact, we do not clearly know what is or is not a bank . . . .&quot;  Bob, you just stated _the problem_ not immovable parameters of our financial universe.  We&#039;ve allowed non-banks to lend and borrow, at high volume, to maximum recklessness, solely for personal gain, with zero oversight.  That is something that can certainly be GREATLY RESTRICTED by regulation, and must be.  Oh, sharpies will always find flash ways to gamble with the funds of others.  Let&#039;s have them follow some basic rules and cut them off before they can take the rest of us down with them.  And while we&#039;re at it, let&#039;s tax them plenty for the privilege of doing business onshore.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&quot;Two of the Feds important recent innovations are {the TAF and the TSLF}.&quot;  No, these weren&#039;t &#039;innovations,&#039; those inventive, risk-taking, heroic deeds seemingly implied by that term, Bob.  These were acts of stone desperation to keep the present insolvency of the financial industry, commercial and speculative both, from killing the banking industry, economy, and currency simultaneously.  We don&#039;t face a &quot;confidence&quot; problem, we face a &#039;confidence _man_&#039; problem which has created an involvency problem.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;In addressing the drivers and structures of our present Subcrime Bubble, I am deeply opposed to concentrating yet more authority in the ever-hidden hands of Our Benevolent Chairman.  The charge of the Fed has been to grow the banking system.  The Fed bungled or stifled it&#039;s regulatory tasks under Greenspan, so those tasks should be reassgined to a different super-agency insulated from direct pressure from the industry and charged with keeping the banks solvent and alive since they can&#039;t seem to manage to to this unaided what with all their &#039;heroic innovation&#039; WHICH THE REST OF US COULD WELL DO ENTIRELY WITHOUT!  If there&#039;s an us and them concerning the plutocrats, Bob, it&#039;s clear you&#039;re not with us.  In the class war of the last generation, the rich have won big, long, and often, but now that it&#039;s time to clink the cuffs you ask us to clink the guineas for them hey again?  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;We need two keys on the banking industry, as I&#039;ve opined before; checks and balances.  This means that if the Fed is the Moderator we need a _real_ Regulator.  Not more smooth operators like Robert Shiller.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*AARRRGHH*  What a stiff-the-stupid-proles shillfest.  What isn&#8217;t redefinition smoke in this piece is &#8217;sign here, my good man&#8217; snake oil.</p>
<p>&#8220;. . . [The]nature of financial institutions is changing . . . the traditional boundaries of banking have blurred . . . In the new financial order, in fact, we do not clearly know what is or is not a bank . . . .&#8221;  Bob, you just stated _the problem_ not immovable parameters of our financial universe.  We&#8217;ve allowed non-banks to lend and borrow, at high volume, to maximum recklessness, solely for personal gain, with zero oversight.  That is something that can certainly be GREATLY RESTRICTED by regulation, and must be.  Oh, sharpies will always find flash ways to gamble with the funds of others.  Let&#8217;s have them follow some basic rules and cut them off before they can take the rest of us down with them.  And while we&#8217;re at it, let&#8217;s tax them plenty for the privilege of doing business onshore.  </p>
<p>&#8220;Two of the Feds important recent innovations are {the TAF and the TSLF}.&#8221;  No, these weren&#8217;t &#8216;innovations,&#8217; those inventive, risk-taking, heroic deeds seemingly implied by that term, Bob.  These were acts of stone desperation to keep the present insolvency of the financial industry, commercial and speculative both, from killing the banking industry, economy, and currency simultaneously.  We don&#8217;t face a &#8220;confidence&#8221; problem, we face a &#8216;confidence _man_&#8217; problem which has created an involvency problem.  </p>
<p>In addressing the drivers and structures of our present Subcrime Bubble, I am deeply opposed to concentrating yet more authority in the ever-hidden hands of Our Benevolent Chairman.  The charge of the Fed has been to grow the banking system.  The Fed bungled or stifled it&#8217;s regulatory tasks under Greenspan, so those tasks should be reassgined to a different super-agency insulated from direct pressure from the industry and charged with keeping the banks solvent and alive since they can&#8217;t seem to manage to to this unaided what with all their &#8216;heroic innovation&#8217; WHICH THE REST OF US COULD WELL DO ENTIRELY WITHOUT!  If there&#8217;s an us and them concerning the plutocrats, Bob, it&#8217;s clear you&#8217;re not with us.  In the class war of the last generation, the rich have won big, long, and often, but now that it&#8217;s time to clink the cuffs you ask us to clink the guineas for them hey again?  </p>
<p>We need two keys on the banking industry, as I&#8217;ve opined before; checks and balances.  This means that if the Fed is the Moderator we need a _real_ Regulator.  Not more smooth operators like Robert Shiller.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
