<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rosner on the Prospects for the Credit Markets (Not for the Fainthearted)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/04/rosner-on-prospects-for-credit-markets.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/04/rosner-on-prospects-for-credit-markets.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:07:33 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/04/rosner-on-prospects-for-credit-markets.html#comment-8696</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 00:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/04/rosner-on-the-prospects-for-the-credit-markets-not-for-the-fainthearted/#comment-8696</guid>
		<description>Excellent, intriguing post!&lt;br/&gt;I was beginning to have doubts as to whether this rebound (in risky assets) was not just a bear-market rally, but to sit out this one seems the better choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent, intriguing post!<br />I was beginning to have doubts as to whether this rebound (in risky assets) was not just a bear-market rally, but to sit out this one seems the better choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/04/rosner-on-prospects-for-credit-markets.html#comment-6570</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 01:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/04/rosner-on-the-prospects-for-the-credit-markets-not-for-the-fainthearted/#comment-6570</guid>
		<description>i wonder how many 60 year olds at the leading edge of the baby boom have 25 years left on a 30 year mortgage and an equity line?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i wonder how many 60 year olds at the leading edge of the baby boom have 25 years left on a 30 year mortgage and an equity line?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Economist Esq</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/04/rosner-on-prospects-for-credit-markets.html#comment-6565</link>
		<dc:creator>Economist Esq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 20:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/04/rosner-on-the-prospects-for-the-credit-markets-not-for-the-fainthearted/#comment-6565</guid>
		<description>http://regulatoryeconomist.blogspot.com/2008/04/policy-response-to-credit-crunch.html&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The IRA is a little too casual in the way it flings around comments like &quot;Bernanke seems completely co-opted.&quot;   Nonetheless, this is a good read and a nice writeup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://regulatoryeconomist.blogspot.com/2008/04/policy-response-to-credit-crunch.html" rel="nofollow">http://regulatoryeconomist.blogspot.com/2008/04/policy-response-to-credit-crunch.html</a></p>
<p>The IRA is a little too casual in the way it flings around comments like &#8220;Bernanke seems completely co-opted.&#8221;   Nonetheless, this is a good read and a nice writeup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/04/rosner-on-prospects-for-credit-markets.html#comment-6553</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 16:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/04/rosner-on-the-prospects-for-the-credit-markets-not-for-the-fainthearted/#comment-6553</guid>
		<description>It is simply axiomatic, we hedge funds are smarter than the common person and we understand risk beter and better everyday.  We are the future, because we are unregulated!&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;KKR raises $17.6bn global fund&lt;br/&gt;The global buyout firm has closed its KKR 2006 fund slightly shy of its $18 billion hard cap.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;http://www.peimedia.com/Article.aspx?article=14116&amp;hashID=93CB92F21FBE5483CB8B153197848BF05F6B5D66&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Re:  necdotally, investors have recently been turning to mid-market managers, who they believe are less reliant on leverage for their deals. US alternative investment firm The Blackstone Group has delayed the first close of its $20 billion (€12.6 billion) fundraising from April to June, according to trade newsletter Private Equity Insider.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;But an investor in Blackstone’s fund said any delay would be insignificant to Blackstone. “Blackstone doesn’t need to wait. It’s simply, like most buyout firms, they have a large investor base and higher complexity to deal with all the different legal paperwork.”&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;He said firms like CVC Capital Partners and TPG Capital are actively working on their planned funds. “TPG’s global fund could be above $20 billion and they have already got past $10 billion,” he said. CVC’s European fundraising effort had been thought to be closing as high as €12.1 billion, a European record, but it is now understood that it may close lower than this total but at €11 billion in the first half, according to an investor in the firm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is simply axiomatic, we hedge funds are smarter than the common person and we understand risk beter and better everyday.  We are the future, because we are unregulated!</p>
<p>KKR raises $17.6bn global fund<br />The global buyout firm has closed its KKR 2006 fund slightly shy of its $18 billion hard cap.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.peimedia.com/Article.aspx?article=14116&#038;hashID=93CB92F21FBE5483CB8B153197848BF05F6B5D66" rel="nofollow">http://www.peimedia.com/Article.aspx?article=14116&#038;hashID=93CB92F21FBE5483CB8B153197848BF05F6B5D66</a></p>
<p>Re:  necdotally, investors have recently been turning to mid-market managers, who they believe are less reliant on leverage for their deals. US alternative investment firm The Blackstone Group has delayed the first close of its $20 billion (€12.6 billion) fundraising from April to June, according to trade newsletter Private Equity Insider.</p>
<p>But an investor in Blackstone’s fund said any delay would be insignificant to Blackstone. “Blackstone doesn’t need to wait. It’s simply, like most buyout firms, they have a large investor base and higher complexity to deal with all the different legal paperwork.”</p>
<p>He said firms like CVC Capital Partners and TPG Capital are actively working on their planned funds. “TPG’s global fund could be above $20 billion and they have already got past $10 billion,” he said. CVC’s European fundraising effort had been thought to be closing as high as €12.1 billion, a European record, but it is now understood that it may close lower than this total but at €11 billion in the first half, according to an investor in the firm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/04/rosner-on-prospects-for-credit-markets.html#comment-6551</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 14:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/04/rosner-on-the-prospects-for-the-credit-markets-not-for-the-fainthearted/#comment-6551</guid>
		<description>&quot;Rosner: There is a lack of appreciation or maybe a lack of understanding between these two issues, mark to market losses and actual credit losses, and we need to distinguish between these two issues&quot;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;He certainly hasn&#039;t cleared up the understanding. The issue is whether current MTM is indicative of future credit losses - not that there is some sort of systematic economic difference between the two. I don&#039;t trust armageddon forecasting on the basis of sloppy analysis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Rosner: There is a lack of appreciation or maybe a lack of understanding between these two issues, mark to market losses and actual credit losses, and we need to distinguish between these two issues&#8221;</p>
<p>He certainly hasn&#8217;t cleared up the understanding. The issue is whether current MTM is indicative of future credit losses &#8211; not that there is some sort of systematic economic difference between the two. I don&#8217;t trust armageddon forecasting on the basis of sloppy analysis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Kline</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/04/rosner-on-prospects-for-credit-markets.html#comment-6547</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Kline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 13:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/04/rosner-on-the-prospects-for-the-credit-markets-not-for-the-fainthearted/#comment-6547</guid>
		<description>On Rosner, it&#039;s a pleasure to see someone actually call it like he sees it in words of few syllables.  Truth telling is the anodyne to the daily obfuscations from Voices of Responsibility.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;MTM losses:  &quot;We think the loan isn&#039;t worth it&#039;s face value.&quot;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Credit losses:  &quot;We know the collateral isn&#039;t worth the loan value . . . cause a lot of the time the collateral is worth zero.&quot;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;That&#039;s a big difference.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;And those Landesbanks, whoa doggie them&#039;s some big bites.  I can see from that perspective why he wants to be short the euro, yessir.  Spain has been the most hideous property bubble of &#039;em all, and unwinding it will be a toughie.  Europe has the money; it may not want to spend it that way, that&#039;s the rub.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Rosner, it&#8217;s a pleasure to see someone actually call it like he sees it in words of few syllables.  Truth telling is the anodyne to the daily obfuscations from Voices of Responsibility.  </p>
<p>MTM losses:  &#8220;We think the loan isn&#8217;t worth it&#8217;s face value.&#8221;</p>
<p>Credit losses:  &#8220;We know the collateral isn&#8217;t worth the loan value . . . cause a lot of the time the collateral is worth zero.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a big difference.</p>
<p>And those Landesbanks, whoa doggie them&#8217;s some big bites.  I can see from that perspective why he wants to be short the euro, yessir.  Spain has been the most hideous property bubble of &#8216;em all, and unwinding it will be a toughie.  Europe has the money; it may not want to spend it that way, that&#8217;s the rub.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/04/rosner-on-prospects-for-credit-markets.html#comment-6541</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 11:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/04/rosner-on-the-prospects-for-the-credit-markets-not-for-the-fainthearted/#comment-6541</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s he getting at re the difference between MTM losses and actual credit losses?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;MTM on mortgage securities is the market&#039;s attempt to estimate future cash flow (credit) shortfalls on the underlying mortgages.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;He talks about it as if credit losses on mortgages for example are over and above and separate from MTM losses on mortgages. What&#039;s he talking about? MTM losses are an estimate that are subject to future adjustment, up or down, depending on the actual credit outcome.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Illogical hyperbole on this issue at least.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s he getting at re the difference between MTM losses and actual credit losses?</p>
<p>MTM on mortgage securities is the market&#8217;s attempt to estimate future cash flow (credit) shortfalls on the underlying mortgages.</p>
<p>He talks about it as if credit losses on mortgages for example are over and above and separate from MTM losses on mortgages. What&#8217;s he talking about? MTM losses are an estimate that are subject to future adjustment, up or down, depending on the actual credit outcome.</p>
<p>Illogical hyperbole on this issue at least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/04/rosner-on-prospects-for-credit-markets.html#comment-6540</link>
		<dc:creator>a</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 10:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/04/rosner-on-the-prospects-for-the-credit-markets-not-for-the-fainthearted/#comment-6540</guid>
		<description>Truly excellent.  Much thanks for posting this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Truly excellent.  Much thanks for posting this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eh</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/04/rosner-on-prospects-for-credit-markets.html#comment-6535</link>
		<dc:creator>eh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 08:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/04/rosner-on-the-prospects-for-the-credit-markets-not-for-the-fainthearted/#comment-6535</guid>
		<description>I see you posted on commented on the Greenspan/FT anti mea culpa earlier. Sorry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see you posted on commented on the Greenspan/FT anti mea culpa earlier. Sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eh</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/04/rosner-on-prospects-for-credit-markets.html#comment-6534</link>
		<dc:creator>eh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 08:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/04/rosner-on-the-prospects-for-the-credit-markets-not-for-the-fainthearted/#comment-6534</guid>
		<description>Very interesting. However, I expect the anti-Rosner, second half 2008 happy talk to continue to drive the markets higher.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;More about Greenspan &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aK6fhJY95tPg&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here in Bloomberg&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/81c05200-03f2-11dd-b28b-000077b07658.html&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here in the FT&lt;/a&gt; (the FT oped is referenced in the Bloomberg piece). He really comes off as a smug, self-serving jerk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting. However, I expect the anti-Rosner, second half 2008 happy talk to continue to drive the markets higher.</p>
<p>More about Greenspan <a HREF="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&#038;sid=aK6fhJY95tPg" REL="nofollow">here in Bloomberg</a> and <a HREF="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/81c05200-03f2-11dd-b28b-000077b07658.html" REL="nofollow">here in the FT</a> (the FT oped is referenced in the Bloomberg piece). He really comes off as a smug, self-serving jerk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
