<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Credit Default Swaps Losses Estimated at $150 Billion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/credit-default-swaps-losses-estimated.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/credit-default-swaps-losses-estimated.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 07:56:24 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: S</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/credit-default-swaps-losses-estimated.html#comment-8331</link>
		<dc:creator>S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 14:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/credit-default-swaps-losses-estimated-at-150-billion/#comment-8331</guid>
		<description>Bondinvestor,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;What is the impact of catbonds -- ICAP announced in reuslts it is moving mre aggressivily into this area - yet another securitized product only seems this is abject gambling.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Also could you explain previous question on liability?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bondinvestor,</p>
<p>What is the impact of catbonds &#8212; ICAP announced in reuslts it is moving mre aggressivily into this area &#8211; yet another securitized product only seems this is abject gambling.</p>
<p>Also could you explain previous question on liability?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Kline</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/credit-default-swaps-losses-estimated.html#comment-8322</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Kline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 12:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/credit-default-swaps-losses-estimated-at-150-billion/#comment-8322</guid>
		<description>&quot;Customers don&#039;t necessarily know where the market is . . . .&quot;  *aaiiieeEEEEEE!*  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Bondinvestor, I&#039;m with you:  increasing recklessness from liability limitation is a big worry for me with hedgies.  Remember, Meriwether got a second chance to lose his investor&#039;s money.  This is what the system learned, that no failure is too big to end your career.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I do remember when Lloyd&#039;s kissed a chainsaw.  One reason why the financial system generally may have learned little from it was the unique internal structure of Lloyds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Customers don&#8217;t necessarily know where the market is . . . .&#8221;  *aaiiieeEEEEEE!*  </p>
<p>Bondinvestor, I&#8217;m with you:  increasing recklessness from liability limitation is a big worry for me with hedgies.  Remember, Meriwether got a second chance to lose his investor&#8217;s money.  This is what the system learned, that no failure is too big to end your career.  </p>
<p>I do remember when Lloyd&#8217;s kissed a chainsaw.  One reason why the financial system generally may have learned little from it was the unique internal structure of Lloyds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yves Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/credit-default-swaps-losses-estimated.html#comment-8315</link>
		<dc:creator>Yves Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 10:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/credit-default-swaps-losses-estimated-at-150-billion/#comment-8315</guid>
		<description>binaryoptions,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;To the extent that the contracts are standardized (and I understand the ones written a few years ago were not only non-standard, but even some were not juridically valid, and some are still outstanding) they are only in terms of contract boilerplate. They are NOT standardized in respect of their terms, they are customized.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>binaryoptions,</p>
<p>To the extent that the contracts are standardized (and I understand the ones written a few years ago were not only non-standard, but even some were not juridically valid, and some are still outstanding) they are only in terms of contract boilerplate. They are NOT standardized in respect of their terms, they are customized.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Amery</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/credit-default-swaps-losses-estimated.html#comment-8314</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Amery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 08:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/credit-default-swaps-losses-estimated-at-150-billion/#comment-8314</guid>
		<description>Bond investor, I don&#039;t understand your comment that the limited liability of the CDS counterparties vs. the unlimited liability of Lloyd&#039;s names makes this crisis potentially worse (apart from the scale of the exposures now and then, of course) - please elaborate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bond investor, I don&#8217;t understand your comment that the limited liability of the CDS counterparties vs. the unlimited liability of Lloyd&#8217;s names makes this crisis potentially worse (apart from the scale of the exposures now and then, of course) &#8211; please elaborate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: derino</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/credit-default-swaps-losses-estimated.html#comment-8313</link>
		<dc:creator>derino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 08:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/credit-default-swaps-losses-estimated-at-150-billion/#comment-8313</guid>
		<description>bondinvestor - and of course the big similarity between Lloyds and this is the circularity of it all. Claims will just go round and round the system. The trigger for the Lloyds collapse were the claims from the Piper Alpha disaster, which came to about $1bn in total - big, but could have been easily absorbed by the market. Instead the excess of loss policies meant that the total of claims across the market was about $16bn, with the results you&#039;ve described.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bondinvestor &#8211; and of course the big similarity between Lloyds and this is the circularity of it all. Claims will just go round and round the system. The trigger for the Lloyds collapse were the claims from the Piper Alpha disaster, which came to about $1bn in total &#8211; big, but could have been easily absorbed by the market. Instead the excess of loss policies meant that the total of claims across the market was about $16bn, with the results you&#8217;ve described.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eh</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/credit-default-swaps-losses-estimated.html#comment-8312</link>
		<dc:creator>eh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 07:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/credit-default-swaps-losses-estimated-at-150-billion/#comment-8312</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Be crystal clear that it is necessary.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The government ought to do something similar with the GSEs -- pump a judicious amount of capital in and then turn them loose. No more &#039;implicit&#039; guarantee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Be crystal clear that it is necessary.</i></p>
<p>The government ought to do something similar with the GSEs &#8212; pump a judicious amount of capital in and then turn them loose. No more &#8216;implicit&#8217; guarantee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: binaryoptions</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/credit-default-swaps-losses-estimated.html#comment-8311</link>
		<dc:creator>binaryoptions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 05:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/credit-default-swaps-losses-estimated-at-150-billion/#comment-8311</guid>
		<description>I thought CDS were being &quot;marked-to-market&quot; under those standardized contracts provided by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association. If so, then wouldn&#039;t any per-transfer loss/gain in the value of the outstanding swap already have been settled, thus decreasing the notional?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought CDS were being &#8220;marked-to-market&#8221; under those standardized contracts provided by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association. If so, then wouldn&#8217;t any per-transfer loss/gain in the value of the outstanding swap already have been settled, thus decreasing the notional?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobo7874</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/credit-default-swaps-losses-estimated.html#comment-8309</link>
		<dc:creator>bobo7874</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 01:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/credit-default-swaps-losses-estimated-at-150-billion/#comment-8309</guid>
		<description>bondinvestor,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Don&#039;t take too much comfort about CDS exposure being limited, as opposed to unlimited in the case of loss reinsurance.  Lots of players have over 20 to 1 in actual leverage before taking into account leverage through their book of trades.  Plus, it&#039;s virtually guaranteed that a lot of purported hedges have significant missmatches.  Like last year, some people were long ABX AAA, and short ABX BBB-, and got hammered when losses on their long position swamped gains on their short position.  If you get one player crack up from a big missmatch in their purpotedly offsetting positions, that can cause some of their highly leveraged counterparties and lenders to also crack up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bondinvestor,</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t take too much comfort about CDS exposure being limited, as opposed to unlimited in the case of loss reinsurance.  Lots of players have over 20 to 1 in actual leverage before taking into account leverage through their book of trades.  Plus, it&#8217;s virtually guaranteed that a lot of purported hedges have significant missmatches.  Like last year, some people were long ABX AAA, and short ABX BBB-, and got hammered when losses on their long position swamped gains on their short position.  If you get one player crack up from a big missmatch in their purpotedly offsetting positions, that can cause some of their highly leveraged counterparties and lenders to also crack up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/credit-default-swaps-losses-estimated.html#comment-8308</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 00:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/credit-default-swaps-losses-estimated-at-150-billion/#comment-8308</guid>
		<description>Righteo, bondinvestor, Lloyds&#039; market was not a repository for the national wealth of the UK. Instead it was a way to monetize the gentry&#039;s illiquid assets by pledging their stately homes, art collections and wine cellars as collateral. So the collapse had the salutary effect of pushing their Gini coefficient toward equality. Also good deals on collectibles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Righteo, bondinvestor, Lloyds&#8217; market was not a repository for the national wealth of the UK. Instead it was a way to monetize the gentry&#8217;s illiquid assets by pledging their stately homes, art collections and wine cellars as collateral. So the collapse had the salutary effect of pushing their Gini coefficient toward equality. Also good deals on collectibles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/credit-default-swaps-losses-estimated.html#comment-8307</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 00:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/credit-default-swaps-losses-estimated-at-150-billion/#comment-8307</guid>
		<description>Who are the &quot;6 to 10 dealers who sit in the middle of all this&quot; ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who are the &#8220;6 to 10 dealers who sit in the middle of all this&#8221; ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
