<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Diverging Views on Inflation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/diverging-views-on-inflation.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/diverging-views-on-inflation.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 03:10:07 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/diverging-views-on-inflation.html#comment-8298</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 19:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/diverging-views-on-inflation/#comment-8298</guid>
		<description>A linkage error: Bond link above is leading to the Magnus article in FT, not the Bond article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A linkage error: Bond link above is leading to the Magnus article in FT, not the Bond article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/diverging-views-on-inflation.html#comment-8294</link>
		<dc:creator>S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 17:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/diverging-views-on-inflation/#comment-8294</guid>
		<description>CFA designation for you charterholders - should not be used as a noun! &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Yves,&lt;br/&gt;Corporate profits as a % of GDP remain at a very elevated level. During the early 80s recession, they fell to 6% vs. 11% today. trichet is saying that wage push can not be allowed to occur, hence the raise bias. In essence, lets jump to the early eighties and have a good fleecing. The Fed on the other hand seems anchored to the staglationary 70s, perhaps with good reason being afraid of the dire consequences of what a repeat of the early 80s would look like given the leverage in the system (Argentina being the extreme example). Neverthless, look at how corproate profits performed in the late 70s, they actually increased share (stocks were flattish). However, the pain was just delyaed uintil the early eighties when you had a peak to trough move of 400 bps. Unless we have entered a new paradigm and corproations are simply sustainable more efficient. Considering that wages are really the sole remaining turley variable cost, I infer from the chart that either unemployment is going to begin skyrocketing or profits are wildly overstated. Either way not good news.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CFA designation for you charterholders &#8211; should not be used as a noun! </p>
<p>Yves,<br />Corporate profits as a % of GDP remain at a very elevated level. During the early 80s recession, they fell to 6% vs. 11% today. trichet is saying that wage push can not be allowed to occur, hence the raise bias. In essence, lets jump to the early eighties and have a good fleecing. The Fed on the other hand seems anchored to the staglationary 70s, perhaps with good reason being afraid of the dire consequences of what a repeat of the early 80s would look like given the leverage in the system (Argentina being the extreme example). Neverthless, look at how corproate profits performed in the late 70s, they actually increased share (stocks were flattish). However, the pain was just delyaed uintil the early eighties when you had a peak to trough move of 400 bps. Unless we have entered a new paradigm and corproations are simply sustainable more efficient. Considering that wages are really the sole remaining turley variable cost, I infer from the chart that either unemployment is going to begin skyrocketing or profits are wildly overstated. Either way not good news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/diverging-views-on-inflation.html#comment-8292</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 16:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/diverging-views-on-inflation/#comment-8292</guid>
		<description>CFA in India was started by the same people who run CFA in US.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CFA in India was started by the same people who run CFA in US.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HoosierDaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/diverging-views-on-inflation.html#comment-8286</link>
		<dc:creator>HoosierDaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 13:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/diverging-views-on-inflation/#comment-8286</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t there a strange trademark issue with CFAs in India? I believe a local organization owns the rights to the CFA designation in India. So a CFA in India may not be quite the same as a CFA elsewhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t there a strange trademark issue with CFAs in India? I believe a local organization owns the rights to the CFA designation in India. So a CFA in India may not be quite the same as a CFA elsewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#34;Cassandra&#34;</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/diverging-views-on-inflation.html#comment-8283</link>
		<dc:creator>&#34;Cassandra&#34;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 11:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/diverging-views-on-inflation/#comment-8283</guid>
		<description>Scylla and Charydbis indeed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scylla and Charydbis indeed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobo7874</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/diverging-views-on-inflation.html#comment-8282</link>
		<dc:creator>bobo7874</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 10:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/diverging-views-on-inflation/#comment-8282</guid>
		<description>Law firms and accounting firms are starting to move sophisticated legal and tax work to India.  It takes time because people take a while to train, but it&#039;s moved beyond reviewing documents for due diligence or discovery in litigation and into contract drafting, patent prosecution, and so on.  India has also started producing a large number of CFA&#039;s, which are potential competition for securities analysts in the US.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I think we&#039;re starting to see pushback against the trade deals that permit all this competition from abroad.  The US might start going the way of Japan and Germany which have a more protectionist stance than the US.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Law firms and accounting firms are starting to move sophisticated legal and tax work to India.  It takes time because people take a while to train, but it&#8217;s moved beyond reviewing documents for due diligence or discovery in litigation and into contract drafting, patent prosecution, and so on.  India has also started producing a large number of CFA&#8217;s, which are potential competition for securities analysts in the US.</p>
<p>I think we&#8217;re starting to see pushback against the trade deals that permit all this competition from abroad.  The US might start going the way of Japan and Germany which have a more protectionist stance than the US.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
