<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Links 5/11/08</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/links-51108.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/links-51108.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:09:47 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dearieme</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/links-51108.html#comment-7880</link>
		<dc:creator>dearieme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 17:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/links-51108/#comment-7880</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m no Churchill-worshipper, but I object to this: &quot;..the war cabinet was discussing the merits of poison gas (whose use against &quot;uncivilised tribes&quot; in Iraq Churchill had defended in 1920)&quot;.  What Churchill and others called &quot;poison gas&quot; in the 20s is what we now call tear gas.  I suspect that the meaning of the phrase was changed for ever by Nazi practice.  Any writer who doesn&#039;t tell his readers this is a very naughty boy.  As for the end of the Western Empires: well, that was FDR&#039;s ambition.  He didn&#039;t mind the Russian Empire, though.  It has occurred to me that it was ship-borne Empires that he objected to, rather than horse-borne, for obvious reasons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m no Churchill-worshipper, but I object to this: &#8220;..the war cabinet was discussing the merits of poison gas (whose use against &#8220;uncivilised tribes&#8221; in Iraq Churchill had defended in 1920)&#8221;.  What Churchill and others called &#8220;poison gas&#8221; in the 20s is what we now call tear gas.  I suspect that the meaning of the phrase was changed for ever by Nazi practice.  Any writer who doesn&#8217;t tell his readers this is a very naughty boy.  As for the end of the Western Empires: well, that was FDR&#8217;s ambition.  He didn&#8217;t mind the Russian Empire, though.  It has occurred to me that it was ship-borne Empires that he objected to, rather than horse-borne, for obvious reasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
