<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MBIA Reports $2.4 Billion 1Q Loss, Downstreams Cash to Sub</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/mbia-reports-24-billion-1q-loss.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/mbia-reports-24-billion-1q-loss.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:17:20 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Richard Kline</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/mbia-reports-24-billion-1q-loss.html#comment-8010</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Kline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 22:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/mbia-reports-24-billion-1q-loss-downstreams-cash-to-sub/#comment-8010</guid>
		<description>&quot;Attention gettin . . . . .&quot;  Yessir, losing both legs at the hip without subsequent cauterization does have an impact, especially after already having one&#039;s right arm blown off.  The modo/duolines are so dead it would take the Monty Python team to do their justice to their final undulations.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The newspapers and the markets generally are in the &#039;blood oxygen isn&#039;t getting to the brain&#039; stage.  Oils drops from $126 to $124 and we&#039;re told it&#039;s cause for a market rally.  A monoline reports $3.6B in swap losses, and someone says, &quot;It&#039;s all priced in now, Mama.&quot;  *yeesh*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Attention gettin . . . . .&#8221;  Yessir, losing both legs at the hip without subsequent cauterization does have an impact, especially after already having one&#8217;s right arm blown off.  The modo/duolines are so dead it would take the Monty Python team to do their justice to their final undulations.  </p>
<p>The newspapers and the markets generally are in the &#8216;blood oxygen isn&#8217;t getting to the brain&#8217; stage.  Oils drops from $126 to $124 and we&#8217;re told it&#8217;s cause for a market rally.  A monoline reports $3.6B in swap losses, and someone says, &#8220;It&#8217;s all priced in now, Mama.&#8221;  *yeesh*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ginger Yellow</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/mbia-reports-24-billion-1q-loss.html#comment-7954</link>
		<dc:creator>Ginger Yellow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 21:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/mbia-reports-24-billion-1q-loss-downstreams-cash-to-sub/#comment-7954</guid>
		<description>Speaking of stress tests, I noticed something a bit odd in the 10-Q. I may be misreading it (I only skim-read it), but it seemed to say that their base case loss estimates for subprime portfolios were 16%-20%, while the stress case was 18%-22%. That doesn&#039;t seem like much of a stress to me, and is far below ABX-implied losses. Even if you don&#039;t think the ABX is a realistic or applicable base case, surely it should be covered by your stress test.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of stress tests, I noticed something a bit odd in the 10-Q. I may be misreading it (I only skim-read it), but it seemed to say that their base case loss estimates for subprime portfolios were 16%-20%, while the stress case was 18%-22%. That doesn&#8217;t seem like much of a stress to me, and is far below ABX-implied losses. Even if you don&#8217;t think the ABX is a realistic or applicable base case, surely it should be covered by your stress test.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/mbia-reports-24-billion-1q-loss.html#comment-7951</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 20:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/mbia-reports-24-billion-1q-loss-downstreams-cash-to-sub/#comment-7951</guid>
		<description>One interesting comment was the auditors only look at the reserves and losses on an annual basis. They can pretty much say anything they want for awhile...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One interesting comment was the auditors only look at the reserves and losses on an annual basis. They can pretty much say anything they want for awhile&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RK</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/mbia-reports-24-billion-1q-loss.html#comment-7949</link>
		<dc:creator>RK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 20:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/mbia-reports-24-billion-1q-loss-downstreams-cash-to-sub/#comment-7949</guid>
		<description>Eric Dinallo appeared on CNBC today at  11:30 and said that, while the loss was greater than &quot;analysts estimates&quot;, it was within the &quot;stress test &quot; estimates worked out between the rating agencies and NYS insurance commissioner&#039;s office. He also spoke about the question of whether CDS constituted insurance, and spoke of the differential treatment which perhaps should be given to CDS which actually hedge a real position (such as a bond) and CDS which are purely &lt;br/&gt;options on a  given event.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric Dinallo appeared on CNBC today at  11:30 and said that, while the loss was greater than &#8220;analysts estimates&#8221;, it was within the &#8220;stress test &#8221; estimates worked out between the rating agencies and NYS insurance commissioner&#8217;s office. He also spoke about the question of whether CDS constituted insurance, and spoke of the differential treatment which perhaps should be given to CDS which actually hedge a real position (such as a bond) and CDS which are purely <br />options on a  given event.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/mbia-reports-24-billion-1q-loss.html#comment-7945</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 18:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/mbia-reports-24-billion-1q-loss-downstreams-cash-to-sub/#comment-7945</guid>
		<description>The US is in the biggest period of denial ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The US is in the biggest period of denial ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
