<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TIPS Prices Dispute Commodities Market, Consumer Inflation Views</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/tips-prices-dispute-commodities-market.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/tips-prices-dispute-commodities-market.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:58:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Richard Kline</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/tips-prices-dispute-commodities-market.html#comment-8323</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Kline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 12:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/tips-prices-dispute-commodities-market-consumer-inflation-views/#comment-8323</guid>
		<description>Just a point of info, S:  RK is some who _is not_ Richard Kline.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a point of info, S:  RK is some who _is not_ Richard Kline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/tips-prices-dispute-commodities-market.html#comment-8254</link>
		<dc:creator>S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 16:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/tips-prices-dispute-commodities-market-consumer-inflation-views/#comment-8254</guid>
		<description>Yves,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I agree credit spreads started moving in June, but that was a month before the actual event. I guess I was trying to make the point, sloppy as usual, that the irony is fixed income market long knew (participants) that the bubble was massive, but the price of inaction trumped all else. In short, the markets are not really an efficient discounting mechanism in the short run as we know from history. As an aside, if the markets only reflected the bubble one month proir to the eruption, what does that say about preventing bubbles? &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I recall speaking with a major IB internal risk person who predicted in late &#039;06 that they expected the wheels to come off in 2Q:07. They ended up being short subprime. Subprime was not a black swan event at all. It was fully expected almost universally across the Street, it was just too expensive not to play. Sort of like commodities right now. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;We are a long way from d-day in the whole debt/Fed/Consumer hot potato game. Also, while I agree printing is in the offing to replace the bad debt, Mish will eventually be right about full blown deflation. That after all is what occured in 1930s. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;RK makes a very good point about defining mean. The Fed defines mean as 2006 which is of course ludicrous. There is no such thing as high and low equilibriums. There is a market clearing equilibium and the longer we try and reverse the pull of gravity the more painful it will be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yves,</p>
<p>I agree credit spreads started moving in June, but that was a month before the actual event. I guess I was trying to make the point, sloppy as usual, that the irony is fixed income market long knew (participants) that the bubble was massive, but the price of inaction trumped all else. In short, the markets are not really an efficient discounting mechanism in the short run as we know from history. As an aside, if the markets only reflected the bubble one month proir to the eruption, what does that say about preventing bubbles? </p>
<p>I recall speaking with a major IB internal risk person who predicted in late &#8216;06 that they expected the wheels to come off in 2Q:07. They ended up being short subprime. Subprime was not a black swan event at all. It was fully expected almost universally across the Street, it was just too expensive not to play. Sort of like commodities right now. </p>
<p>We are a long way from d-day in the whole debt/Fed/Consumer hot potato game. Also, while I agree printing is in the offing to replace the bad debt, Mish will eventually be right about full blown deflation. That after all is what occured in 1930s. </p>
<p>RK makes a very good point about defining mean. The Fed defines mean as 2006 which is of course ludicrous. There is no such thing as high and low equilibriums. There is a market clearing equilibium and the longer we try and reverse the pull of gravity the more painful it will be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/tips-prices-dispute-commodities-market.html#comment-8251</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 14:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/tips-prices-dispute-commodities-market-consumer-inflation-views/#comment-8251</guid>
		<description>rk is right--I am extremely concerned about inflation but would never buy TIPS as a hedge because the government is the entity who will be determining that inflation rate, and their inflation numbers are a joke. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Was it here or somewhere else that I saw the article the other day about why the bond market was no longer able to police inflation?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Moe Gamble</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rk is right&#8211;I am extremely concerned about inflation but would never buy TIPS as a hedge because the government is the entity who will be determining that inflation rate, and their inflation numbers are a joke. </p>
<p>Was it here or somewhere else that I saw the article the other day about why the bond market was no longer able to police inflation?</p>
<p>Moe Gamble</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RK</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/tips-prices-dispute-commodities-market.html#comment-8248</link>
		<dc:creator>RK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 12:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/tips-prices-dispute-commodities-market-consumer-inflation-views/#comment-8248</guid>
		<description>Show me a citizen who uses TIPS to protect him/her self against inflation (inflation as defined by USG, Boskinized and hedonized) and I&#039;ll show you a moron, who buys a health insurance policy with a million dollar deductible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Show me a citizen who uses TIPS to protect him/her self against inflation (inflation as defined by USG, Boskinized and hedonized) and I&#8217;ll show you a moron, who buys a health insurance policy with a million dollar deductible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Kline</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/tips-prices-dispute-commodities-market.html#comment-8241</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Kline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 08:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/tips-prices-dispute-commodities-market-consumer-inflation-views/#comment-8241</guid>
		<description>One way that the public authorities in the US could and may try to &#039;inflate our cares away&#039; is to issue interest on the repoed junk they are holding, or deliver &#039;operating credits&#039; of various kinds to swap-meet banks.  That would be unsterilized intervention in the guise of &#039;normal lending activity.&#039;  When an as we hear such talk, we&#039;ll know that real deflationary pressures are biting hard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One way that the public authorities in the US could and may try to &#8216;inflate our cares away&#8217; is to issue interest on the repoed junk they are holding, or deliver &#8216;operating credits&#8217; of various kinds to swap-meet banks.  That would be unsterilized intervention in the guise of &#8216;normal lending activity.&#8217;  When an as we hear such talk, we&#8217;ll know that real deflationary pressures are biting hard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Kline</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/tips-prices-dispute-commodities-market.html#comment-8240</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Kline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 07:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/tips-prices-dispute-commodities-market-consumer-inflation-views/#comment-8240</guid>
		<description>A problem with the monetary deflation concept is deflated in comparison to what?  We have had a colossal monetary _inflation_ in the US via uncovered debt creation at the currency level and credit creation at the retail level for thirty years, with a huge spike over the last half dozen years.  A major contraction in credit creation and in false pricing could still leave price activity above long term (post Thirties Depression) trends.  For example, equities have not price-corrected AT ALL to this point.  Externally driven upward price pressures on imports of all kinds including many commodities only exacerbate the upside.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I&#039;m not posing this as a simple question; it isn&#039;t.  But despite asset price declines in the US we are far still from outright deflation by any definition.  If and when assets fall below long-term trends or just approach them, we have &#039;real delation.&#039;  Don&#039;t ask me where that is precisely, but someone can and should be calculating that.  If medium-sized, creditworthy businesses with customer demand can&#039;t get operating credit, we are deep in a deflationary spiral.  We&#039;ll know when we get there, it it happens.  Personally, I think the Powers That Be will monetize debt and push us into a near hyperinflationary state at some point---because they can, while deflation is much harder to fight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A problem with the monetary deflation concept is deflated in comparison to what?  We have had a colossal monetary _inflation_ in the US via uncovered debt creation at the currency level and credit creation at the retail level for thirty years, with a huge spike over the last half dozen years.  A major contraction in credit creation and in false pricing could still leave price activity above long term (post Thirties Depression) trends.  For example, equities have not price-corrected AT ALL to this point.  Externally driven upward price pressures on imports of all kinds including many commodities only exacerbate the upside.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not posing this as a simple question; it isn&#8217;t.  But despite asset price declines in the US we are far still from outright deflation by any definition.  If and when assets fall below long-term trends or just approach them, we have &#8216;real delation.&#8217;  Don&#8217;t ask me where that is precisely, but someone can and should be calculating that.  If medium-sized, creditworthy businesses with customer demand can&#8217;t get operating credit, we are deep in a deflationary spiral.  We&#8217;ll know when we get there, it it happens.  Personally, I think the Powers That Be will monetize debt and push us into a near hyperinflationary state at some point&#8212;because they can, while deflation is much harder to fight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vijay</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/tips-prices-dispute-commodities-market.html#comment-8227</link>
		<dc:creator>Vijay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 03:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/tips-prices-dispute-commodities-market-consumer-inflation-views/#comment-8227</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s possible to have monetary deflation (which would suggest an increase in bonds prices, and a decrease in yields) while simultaneously having a price inflation (if demand for the currency goes down, commodities priced in the currency will go up). The trouble most economic commentators seem to have is that they don&#039;t differentiate between price inflation (a poorly defined measure) and monetary inflation/deflation (as defined by the Austrian school).&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I recommend &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2006/02/inflation-what-heck-is-it.html&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this article&lt;/a&gt; by Mike Shedlock and &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://jonspoliticalramblings.blogspot.com/2008/01/understanding-inflation-and-deflation.html&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this article&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s possible to have monetary deflation (which would suggest an increase in bonds prices, and a decrease in yields) while simultaneously having a price inflation (if demand for the currency goes down, commodities priced in the currency will go up). The trouble most economic commentators seem to have is that they don&#8217;t differentiate between price inflation (a poorly defined measure) and monetary inflation/deflation (as defined by the Austrian school).</p>
<p>I recommend <a HREF="http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2006/02/inflation-what-heck-is-it.html" REL="nofollow">this article</a> by Mike Shedlock and <a HREF="http://jonspoliticalramblings.blogspot.com/2008/01/understanding-inflation-and-deflation.html" REL="nofollow">this article</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john jansen</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/tips-prices-dispute-commodities-market.html#comment-8226</link>
		<dc:creator>john jansen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 03:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/tips-prices-dispute-commodities-market-consumer-inflation-views/#comment-8226</guid>
		<description>Bloomberg quoted the size of the TIPS market as $500 billion. That seems rather large. Secondly, last week when the CPI data printed friendly (bond market friendly) the market for TIPS bonds and nominal bonds acted counterintuitively. The spread actually widened when it should have narrowed as the friendly data should have worked in favor of the nominal bond but did not. traders attributed that to the belief that seasonal factors overstated the weakness this month but will magnify inflation next month</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bloomberg quoted the size of the TIPS market as $500 billion. That seems rather large. Secondly, last week when the CPI data printed friendly (bond market friendly) the market for TIPS bonds and nominal bonds acted counterintuitively. The spread actually widened when it should have narrowed as the friendly data should have worked in favor of the nominal bond but did not. traders attributed that to the belief that seasonal factors overstated the weakness this month but will magnify inflation next month</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yves Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/tips-prices-dispute-commodities-market.html#comment-8223</link>
		<dc:creator>Yves Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 02:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/tips-prices-dispute-commodities-market-consumer-inflation-views/#comment-8223</guid>
		<description>S,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Actually, in early June 2007 there was a big move in bonds that was widely seen by participants as an &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/06/beginning-of-end.html&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;end-of-an-era signal&lt;/a&gt; at the time. About a month later (early July) I called the &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/07/has-credit-contraction-finally-begun.html&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;beginning of the bear credit market&lt;/a&gt;,  and that again was based on commentary and market moves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>S,</p>
<p>Actually, in early June 2007 there was a big move in bonds that was widely seen by participants as an <a HREF="http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/06/beginning-of-end.html" REL="nofollow">end-of-an-era signal</a> at the time. About a month later (early July) I called the <a HREF="http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/07/has-credit-contraction-finally-begun.html" REL="nofollow">beginning of the bear credit market</a>,  and that again was based on commentary and market moves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/tips-prices-dispute-commodities-market.html#comment-8222</link>
		<dc:creator>S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 02:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/05/tips-prices-dispute-commodities-market-consumer-inflation-views/#comment-8222</guid>
		<description>The entire no inlflation thesis is predicated on the notion that the debt at the Fed is money good. When the market realizes it isn;t and will be monotized the genie will have been long out of the bottle. If I am not mistaken the fixed income markets weren;t a great predictor of the August meltdown either...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The entire no inlflation thesis is predicated on the notion that the debt at the Fed is money good. When the market realizes it isn;t and will be monotized the genie will have been long out of the bottle. If I am not mistaken the fixed income markets weren;t a great predictor of the August meltdown either&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
