<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Early Estimates of Losses From MBIA, Ambac Downgrade</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/06/early-estimates-of-losses-from-mbia.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/06/early-estimates-of-losses-from-mbia.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 09:23:14 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/06/early-estimates-of-losses-from-mbia.html#comment-9130</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 22:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/06/early-estimates-of-losses-from-mbia-ambac-downgrade/#comment-9130</guid>
		<description>For which of the Fed&#039;s programs is AA actually eligible? Inquiring minds...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For which of the Fed&#8217;s programs is AA actually eligible? Inquiring minds&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/06/early-estimates-of-losses-from-mbia.html#comment-9090</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 15:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/06/early-estimates-of-losses-from-mbia-ambac-downgrade/#comment-9090</guid>
		<description>is there a situation in which pension funds and institutions like endowments would have to sell en masse the bonds which have now dropped to less than AAA?  If so, I wonder if that is being factored in to loss projections.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is there a situation in which pension funds and institutions like endowments would have to sell en masse the bonds which have now dropped to less than AAA?  If so, I wonder if that is being factored in to loss projections.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yves Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/06/early-estimates-of-losses-from-mbia.html#comment-9076</link>
		<dc:creator>Yves Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 09:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/06/early-estimates-of-losses-from-mbia-ambac-downgrade/#comment-9076</guid>
		<description>I am not certain of the mechanics, but these facilities are fairly short term, although the assumption is that many (most?) banks simply roll the loan. Thus the Fed might demand substitution when the loan matured (14 to 28 days max depending on the facility). Anyone who knows better is encouraged to speak up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not certain of the mechanics, but these facilities are fairly short term, although the assumption is that many (most?) banks simply roll the loan. Thus the Fed might demand substitution when the loan matured (14 to 28 days max depending on the facility). Anyone who knows better is encouraged to speak up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/06/early-estimates-of-losses-from-mbia.html#comment-9075</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 09:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/06/early-estimates-of-losses-from-mbia-ambac-downgrade/#comment-9075</guid>
		<description>Doesn&#039;t the Fed require collateral to be AAA? I don&#039;t know what proportion of securities pledged to the Fed rely on insurance/guarantees by MBIA and Ambac for their triple A rating, but presumbly any that does will now have to be replaced or the loan repaid?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t the Fed require collateral to be AAA? I don&#8217;t know what proportion of securities pledged to the Fed rely on insurance/guarantees by MBIA and Ambac for their triple A rating, but presumbly any that does will now have to be replaced or the loan repaid?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cahagnes</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/06/early-estimates-of-losses-from-mbia.html#comment-9074</link>
		<dc:creator>Cahagnes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 08:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/06/early-estimates-of-losses-from-mbia-ambac-downgrade/#comment-9074</guid>
		<description>@Anonymous: assets posted as collateral remain on the balance sheets of the borrowing banks, so any writedowns will hurt them (and not the Fed).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Anonymous: assets posted as collateral remain on the balance sheets of the borrowing banks, so any writedowns will hurt them (and not the Fed).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/06/early-estimates-of-losses-from-mbia.html#comment-9070</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 04:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/06/early-estimates-of-losses-from-mbia-ambac-downgrade/#comment-9070</guid>
		<description>Hey Naked,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Thanks for being so timely.  I have been wondering about this ever since I read the news.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Anonymous,&lt;br/&gt;Do you think that the collateral is going back to the original owner anytime soon?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Naked,</p>
<p>Thanks for being so timely.  I have been wondering about this ever since I read the news.  </p>
<p>Anonymous,<br />Do you think that the collateral is going back to the original owner anytime soon?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/06/early-estimates-of-losses-from-mbia.html#comment-9069</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 04:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/06/early-estimates-of-losses-from-mbia-ambac-downgrade/#comment-9069</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t forget CIBC!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget CIBC!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Kline</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/06/early-estimates-of-losses-from-mbia.html#comment-9067</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Kline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 03:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/06/early-estimates-of-losses-from-mbia-ambac-downgrade/#comment-9067</guid>
		<description>Sooo $140-200B downdraft?  The Fed has double that in head room, sez they, &quot;What, us worry?? We&#039;ve got yer backstop.&quot;  Let&#039;s get ON with this, methinks:  let the chips follow the dips.  . . . Look, this isn&#039;t gonna be pretty, but it&#039;s seldom you can solve a problme without admitting that you have one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sooo $140-200B downdraft?  The Fed has double that in head room, sez they, &#8220;What, us worry?? We&#8217;ve got yer backstop.&#8221;  Let&#8217;s get ON with this, methinks:  let the chips follow the dips.  . . . Look, this isn&#8217;t gonna be pretty, but it&#8217;s seldom you can solve a problme without admitting that you have one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/06/early-estimates-of-losses-from-mbia.html#comment-9066</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 03:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/06/early-estimates-of-losses-from-mbia-ambac-downgrade/#comment-9066</guid>
		<description>that begs the question what happens when the collateral pledged at the fed gets returned to the original owner after the swap period is over.  thoughts, anyone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that begs the question what happens when the collateral pledged at the fed gets returned to the original owner after the swap period is over.  thoughts, anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/06/early-estimates-of-losses-from-mbia.html#comment-9064</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 02:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/06/early-estimates-of-losses-from-mbia-ambac-downgrade/#comment-9064</guid>
		<description>I doubt the writedowns are large from the banks.  The FED however, may have to write down a lot. Wait, is the FED subject to GAAP? Probably not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doubt the writedowns are large from the banks.  The FED however, may have to write down a lot. Wait, is the FED subject to GAAP? Probably not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
