<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &quot;UK mortgage slump set to continue until 2011&quot;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/07/uk-mortgage-slump-set-to-continue-until.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/07/uk-mortgage-slump-set-to-continue-until.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:39:16 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Loan Modification Services</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/07/uk-mortgage-slump-set-to-continue-until.html#comment-51457</link>
		<dc:creator>Loan Modification Services</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 09:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/07/uk-mortgage-slump-set-to-continue-until-2011/#comment-51457</guid>
		<description>Thanks for sharing this info post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing this info post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/07/uk-mortgage-slump-set-to-continue-until.html#comment-12260</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 06:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/07/uk-mortgage-slump-set-to-continue-until-2011/#comment-12260</guid>
		<description>Full report..&lt;br/&gt;http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/media/3/E/crosby290708.pdf&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&quot;In the early years of this century, mortgage-backed securities markets grew very rapidly and&lt;br/&gt;became a very important source of funding for UK mortgage lenders. So much so that by 2006&lt;br/&gt;such funding equated to around two thirds of net new mortgage lending in the UK. By the end of&lt;br/&gt;2007 the total amount outstanding of UK mortgage-backed securities was £257bn as compared&lt;br/&gt;with total residential mortgages of £1200bn. Investors in such securities were principally attracted&lt;br/&gt;by their liquidity and intrinsically low risk of default and years of unprecedented innovation in&lt;br/&gt;financial markets and apparently rapidly increasing liquidity resulted in explosive growth in&lt;br/&gt;demand. The major investors were banks, their off balance sheet vehicles and money market&lt;br/&gt;funds. By far the greatest demand came from outside the UK.&lt;br/&gt;In July 2007, when credit markets faced a sudden and significant re-pricing of risk, new issuance in&lt;br/&gt;these markets came to an abrupt halt. One year later, trading in the secondary markets continues&lt;br/&gt;to be on much wider interest rate spreads than was hitherto the case. In time these markets will&lt;br/&gt;stage some sort of recovery but I am firmly of the opinion that in the foreseeable future, there&lt;br/&gt;will be very little new issuance of UK mortgage-backed securities.&quot;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Mortgage markets are adjusting to the shortage of funding. Lenders are seeking to re-price&lt;br/&gt;existing mortgages but this is a slow process which will take two or three years to run its course.&lt;br/&gt;This will itself cause an increase in defaults, which are in any case on the increase, if from&lt;br/&gt;historically low levels. In time however, I expect that the increase in prices will more than&lt;br/&gt;compensate banks for higher credit losses. In the meantime, it is hard to see why banks will&lt;br/&gt;increase their currently depressed appetites for risk. While there is still good availability of finance&lt;br/&gt;for those borrowers who offer significant security (i.e. have reliable earnings and seek to borrow&lt;br/&gt;75 per cent or less of the value of their property), the availability of finance to all other&lt;br/&gt;consumers is considerably reduced and likely to remain so.&quot;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&quot;The amount of RMBS and covered bonds maturing in each year from 2008 to&lt;br/&gt;2010 is estimated at around £40bn (Table 4.1), although this is very difficult to&lt;br/&gt;determine with any precision. In context, this figure would equate to around 5 per cent&lt;br/&gt;of the stock of UK banks’ interbank liabilities at end-2007, and more than two thirds of&lt;br/&gt;the net new mortgage lending projected by the Council of Mortgage Lenders in 2008.&quot;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Northern Rock had problems with rolling its securitisations.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Report has some good stuff... and topically looks at European covered bonds market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Full report..<br /><a href="http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/media/3/E/crosby290708.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/media/3/E/crosby290708.pdf</a></p>
<p>&#8220;In the early years of this century, mortgage-backed securities markets grew very rapidly and<br />became a very important source of funding for UK mortgage lenders. So much so that by 2006<br />such funding equated to around two thirds of net new mortgage lending in the UK. By the end of<br />2007 the total amount outstanding of UK mortgage-backed securities was £257bn as compared<br />with total residential mortgages of £1200bn. Investors in such securities were principally attracted<br />by their liquidity and intrinsically low risk of default and years of unprecedented innovation in<br />financial markets and apparently rapidly increasing liquidity resulted in explosive growth in<br />demand. The major investors were banks, their off balance sheet vehicles and money market<br />funds. By far the greatest demand came from outside the UK.<br />In July 2007, when credit markets faced a sudden and significant re-pricing of risk, new issuance in<br />these markets came to an abrupt halt. One year later, trading in the secondary markets continues<br />to be on much wider interest rate spreads than was hitherto the case. In time these markets will<br />stage some sort of recovery but I am firmly of the opinion that in the foreseeable future, there<br />will be very little new issuance of UK mortgage-backed securities.&#8221;</p>
<p>Mortgage markets are adjusting to the shortage of funding. Lenders are seeking to re-price<br />existing mortgages but this is a slow process which will take two or three years to run its course.<br />This will itself cause an increase in defaults, which are in any case on the increase, if from<br />historically low levels. In time however, I expect that the increase in prices will more than<br />compensate banks for higher credit losses. In the meantime, it is hard to see why banks will<br />increase their currently depressed appetites for risk. While there is still good availability of finance<br />for those borrowers who offer significant security (i.e. have reliable earnings and seek to borrow<br />75 per cent or less of the value of their property), the availability of finance to all other<br />consumers is considerably reduced and likely to remain so.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;The amount of RMBS and covered bonds maturing in each year from 2008 to<br />2010 is estimated at around £40bn (Table 4.1), although this is very difficult to<br />determine with any precision. In context, this figure would equate to around 5 per cent<br />of the stock of UK banks’ interbank liabilities at end-2007, and more than two thirds of<br />the net new mortgage lending projected by the Council of Mortgage Lenders in 2008.&#8221;</p>
<p>Northern Rock had problems with rolling its securitisations.</p>
<p>Report has some good stuff&#8230; and topically looks at European covered bonds market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/07/uk-mortgage-slump-set-to-continue-until.html#comment-12259</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 05:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/07/uk-mortgage-slump-set-to-continue-until-2011/#comment-12259</guid>
		<description>It was refreshing that Sir James posed the question (at least rhetorically) of what would be better in the long term. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;In banking and economic policymaking, as in many of life&#039;s ventures, there is an eternal conflict between short- and long-term benefits. It seems that the Greenspan/Bermanke bubbles and their &#039;remedies&#039; so far have gone reflexively for short-term results at the manifest expense of the long term.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was refreshing that Sir James posed the question (at least rhetorically) of what would be better in the long term. </p>
<p>In banking and economic policymaking, as in many of life&#8217;s ventures, there is an eternal conflict between short- and long-term benefits. It seems that the Greenspan/Bermanke bubbles and their &#8216;remedies&#8217; so far have gone reflexively for short-term results at the manifest expense of the long term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yves Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/07/uk-mortgage-slump-set-to-continue-until.html#comment-12252</link>
		<dc:creator>Yves Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 02:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/07/uk-mortgage-slump-set-to-continue-until-2011/#comment-12252</guid>
		<description>The deleted comments were from someone who violated this blog&#039;s repeatedly published comment guidelines. We have indicated we view &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://bigpicture.typepad.com/comments/the_big_picture_disclosur.html&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Barry Ritholtz&lt;/a&gt;&#039;s policy as web standard:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;i&gt;This may be a free country, but The Big Picture is my personal fiefdom. I rule over all as benevolent dictator/philospher king/utility infielder. Fear my wrath, mortals!&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I will ban anyone whom I choose from posting comments -- usually, for a damned good reason, but on rare occasions, for the exact same reason God created the platypus: because I feel like it.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I encourage a broad range of perspectives, philosophies, sexual orientations. Dissent is good. I want to see a debate of views, a battle in the market place of ideas. (Thomas Jefferson wasn&#039;t so dumb after all). You can post on nearly anything, so long as it is at least tangentially related to the topic at hand. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;On occasion, I will &quot;unpublish&quot; a comment if I feel it is too impolite, harsh, ad hominem, inappropriate, or off-topic. Off-topic posts have been rising, and I have taken to unpublishing them en masse. Publish too many comments on a given post (3 or 4 relevant comments out of 30 are fine, 10 out of 30 is excessive). It takes me ~10 seconds to un-publish 10 comments.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;If you find yourself publishing way too many comments, consider this: This humble blog is my forum for expressing my ideas. Get your own damned blog. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;A few things that will get you permanently banned from commenting at The Big Picture. The fastest way to lose posting privileges is to misrepresent your host&#039;s complex and nuanced views in some inane bumper sticker comment. Those who do this, be advised: I&#039;ve read your prose and considered your thought process: Suffice it to say the literary world will suffer no harm for your deletion (Robert Frost&#039;s legacy is safe).&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Other fast tracks to getting banned:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;- Knowingly posting false or malicious material;&lt;br/&gt;- multiple postings under different names;&lt;br/&gt;- generally engaging in troll-like behavior;&lt;br/&gt;- misquoting your host/overlord;&lt;br/&gt;- being impolite in the extreme;&lt;br/&gt;- ad hominem attacks;&lt;br/&gt;- being an asshole.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Right now, someone is reading this and saying to themselves &quot;What does he mean, being an asshole?&quot; If you wondered that to yourself, well the odds strongly favor that you yourself have sphincter-like qualities. Thus, you should consider it likely that you will be banned as a rectoid from posting comments sometime in the near future.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The deleted comments were from someone who violated this blog&#8217;s repeatedly published comment guidelines. We have indicated we view <a HREF="http://bigpicture.typepad.com/comments/the_big_picture_disclosur.html" REL="nofollow">Barry Ritholtz</a>&#8217;s policy as web standard:</p>
<p><i>This may be a free country, but The Big Picture is my personal fiefdom. I rule over all as benevolent dictator/philospher king/utility infielder. Fear my wrath, mortals!</p>
<p>I will ban anyone whom I choose from posting comments &#8212; usually, for a damned good reason, but on rare occasions, for the exact same reason God created the platypus: because I feel like it.</p>
<p>I encourage a broad range of perspectives, philosophies, sexual orientations. Dissent is good. I want to see a debate of views, a battle in the market place of ideas. (Thomas Jefferson wasn&#8217;t so dumb after all). You can post on nearly anything, so long as it is at least tangentially related to the topic at hand. </p>
<p>On occasion, I will &#8220;unpublish&#8221; a comment if I feel it is too impolite, harsh, ad hominem, inappropriate, or off-topic. Off-topic posts have been rising, and I have taken to unpublishing them en masse. Publish too many comments on a given post (3 or 4 relevant comments out of 30 are fine, 10 out of 30 is excessive). It takes me ~10 seconds to un-publish 10 comments.</p>
<p>If you find yourself publishing way too many comments, consider this: This humble blog is my forum for expressing my ideas. Get your own damned blog. </p>
<p>A few things that will get you permanently banned from commenting at The Big Picture. The fastest way to lose posting privileges is to misrepresent your host&#8217;s complex and nuanced views in some inane bumper sticker comment. Those who do this, be advised: I&#8217;ve read your prose and considered your thought process: Suffice it to say the literary world will suffer no harm for your deletion (Robert Frost&#8217;s legacy is safe).</p>
<p>Other fast tracks to getting banned:</p>
<p>- Knowingly posting false or malicious material;<br />- multiple postings under different names;<br />- generally engaging in troll-like behavior;<br />- misquoting your host/overlord;<br />- being impolite in the extreme;<br />- ad hominem attacks;<br />- being an asshole.</p>
<p>Right now, someone is reading this and saying to themselves &#8220;What does he mean, being an asshole?&#8221; If you wondered that to yourself, well the odds strongly favor that you yourself have sphincter-like qualities. Thus, you should consider it likely that you will be banned as a rectoid from posting comments sometime in the near future.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
