<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hedge Funds Continuing to Take It on the Chin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/09/hedge-funds-continuing-to-take-it-on.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/09/hedge-funds-continuing-to-take-it-on.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 06:06:33 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peripheral Visionary</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/09/hedge-funds-continuing-to-take-it-on.html#comment-13983</link>
		<dc:creator>Peripheral Visionary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 21:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/09/hedge-funds-continuing-to-take-it-on-the-chin/#comment-13983</guid>
		<description>One fundamental problem is that, with the market sideways and investors sitting tight or even pulling out, the hedge funds are now reduced to betting against each other.  The market can be a positive-sum game with new money entering either from investors or from dividends, or from private buyouts, but with none of that happening, it is now a zero-sum game, and for every winner there will be a loser.  All the arguments for the outsized fees are starting to look ring hollow now that returns are either converging or, worse, simply becoming random.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One fundamental problem is that, with the market sideways and investors sitting tight or even pulling out, the hedge funds are now reduced to betting against each other.  The market can be a positive-sum game with new money entering either from investors or from dividends, or from private buyouts, but with none of that happening, it is now a zero-sum game, and for every winner there will be a loser.  All the arguments for the outsized fees are starting to look ring hollow now that returns are either converging or, worse, simply becoming random.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mickslam</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/09/hedge-funds-continuing-to-take-it-on.html#comment-13952</link>
		<dc:creator>Mickslam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 14:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/09/hedge-funds-continuing-to-take-it-on-the-chin/#comment-13952</guid>
		<description>Look at the size of Paulsons fund.  $35B!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look at the size of Paulsons fund.  $35B!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
