<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Foreclosure Filings Rise 71% 3Q 2008 vs. 3Q 2007</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/10/foreclosure-filings-rise-71-3q-2008-vs.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/10/foreclosure-filings-rise-71-3q-2008-vs.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 07:56:24 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Flow5</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/10/foreclosure-filings-rise-71-3q-2008-vs.html#comment-22948</link>
		<dc:creator>Flow5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 16:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/10/foreclosure-filings-rise-71-3q-2008-vs-3q-2007/#comment-22948</guid>
		<description>&quot;since it counts each court filing in the foreclosure process, and any foreclosure involves multiple filings&quot;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;(1) The number of foreclosures,  and (2) the number of duplicate filings, certainly are not independent from each other (over time, or otherwise).  This is true of many economic statistics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;since it counts each court filing in the foreclosure process, and any foreclosure involves multiple filings&#8221;</p>
<p>(1) The number of foreclosures,  and (2) the number of duplicate filings, certainly are not independent from each other (over time, or otherwise).  This is true of many economic statistics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpeciousRiches</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/10/foreclosure-filings-rise-71-3q-2008-vs.html#comment-22783</link>
		<dc:creator>SpeciousRiches</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 21:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/10/foreclosure-filings-rise-71-3q-2008-vs-3q-2007/#comment-22783</guid>
		<description>I just wrote about housing this morning.  We have just gone through the first wave of subprime ARM mortgage resets.  Next up are Alt-A ARM resets.  How much different is the credit quality of Alt-A and is it enough to offset the fact that Alt-A issuance peaked later meaning many more Alt-A mortgages are under-water.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;And then we have option ARMs... I can&#039;t see housing being anything but a major headwind for the economy for the next 5 years at least.  Are equities really pricing in no or negative growth for 2 year, maybe more?  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I don&#039;t know the answers, but if someone can cheer me up by telling me we are near a bottom I would be extremely grateful!  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;SpeciousRiches&lt;br/&gt;http://speciousriches.wordpress.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just wrote about housing this morning.  We have just gone through the first wave of subprime ARM mortgage resets.  Next up are Alt-A ARM resets.  How much different is the credit quality of Alt-A and is it enough to offset the fact that Alt-A issuance peaked later meaning many more Alt-A mortgages are under-water.  </p>
<p>And then we have option ARMs&#8230; I can&#8217;t see housing being anything but a major headwind for the economy for the next 5 years at least.  Are equities really pricing in no or negative growth for 2 year, maybe more?  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know the answers, but if someone can cheer me up by telling me we are near a bottom I would be extremely grateful!  </p>
<p>SpeciousRiches<br /><a href="http://speciousriches.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">http://speciousriches.wordpress.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doc holiday</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/10/foreclosure-filings-rise-71-3q-2008-vs.html#comment-22778</link>
		<dc:creator>doc holiday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/10/foreclosure-filings-rise-71-3q-2008-vs-3q-2007/#comment-22778</guid>
		<description>Kind of OT, but:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;We just had a huge expansionistic bubble with homes, autos, malls and a tsunami of credit expansion and now, we are to sit back and depreciate this and then re-prime the expansion pump for another tsunami? I guess we will re-value homes, cars, retail goods, etc, but what does this imply for future growth, if the past 8 years of economic expansion, is essentially, exactly like a car being driven off a dealership lot, and then plummeting in value  -- what&#039;s the point?  This obviously supply driven with too much consumption and zero future value, i.e, an Ownership Society that is a Disposable Society that thrives on waste an zero accountability!  Bah Humbug!&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Re: A capital consumption allowance is that portion of the gross domestic product of a nation that can be attributed to depreciation. In effect, the capital consumption allowance is a means of allowing for the fact that that there is a need for the replacement of resources in order to maintain a given level of productivity in the nation. The capital consumption allowance actually addresses two aspects of the capital of a given country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kind of OT, but:</p>
<p>We just had a huge expansionistic bubble with homes, autos, malls and a tsunami of credit expansion and now, we are to sit back and depreciate this and then re-prime the expansion pump for another tsunami? I guess we will re-value homes, cars, retail goods, etc, but what does this imply for future growth, if the past 8 years of economic expansion, is essentially, exactly like a car being driven off a dealership lot, and then plummeting in value  &#8212; what&#8217;s the point?  This obviously supply driven with too much consumption and zero future value, i.e, an Ownership Society that is a Disposable Society that thrives on waste an zero accountability!  Bah Humbug!</p>
<p>Re: A capital consumption allowance is that portion of the gross domestic product of a nation that can be attributed to depreciation. In effect, the capital consumption allowance is a means of allowing for the fact that that there is a need for the replacement of resources in order to maintain a given level of productivity in the nation. The capital consumption allowance actually addresses two aspects of the capital of a given country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/10/foreclosure-filings-rise-71-3q-2008-vs.html#comment-22776</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 18:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/10/foreclosure-filings-rise-71-3q-2008-vs-3q-2007/#comment-22776</guid>
		<description>real time stock market calls (bottom) has just been issued. details below:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&quot;.... The call is at follows:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;2:22PM: with sp500 at 859, Dow at 8244, and Nasdaq 100 at 1178, according to our analysis, the market is at the bottom area.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;To your profits!&quot;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;http://www.marketwarnings.com/2008/10/dow-sp500-bottom-of-stock-market.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>real time stock market calls (bottom) has just been issued. details below:</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;. The call is at follows:</p>
<p>2:22PM: with sp500 at 859, Dow at 8244, and Nasdaq 100 at 1178, according to our analysis, the market is at the bottom area.</p>
<p>To your profits!&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.marketwarnings.com/2008/10/dow-sp500-bottom-of-stock-market.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.marketwarnings.com/2008/10/dow-sp500-bottom-of-stock-market.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/10/foreclosure-filings-rise-71-3q-2008-vs.html#comment-22769</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/10/foreclosure-filings-rise-71-3q-2008-vs-3q-2007/#comment-22769</guid>
		<description>&quot;....$40 billion is nothing. Below are real-time foreclosure stats for CA. Remember, CA is 35% of all defaults and foreclosures by count and 45% by dollar volume. While its nice to see this topic addressed $40 billion is not much considering int he state of CA, total Notice-of-Defaults and actual Foreclosures are averaging about $28 to $30 billion per month. This means on a national level, roughly $70 billion. Given this $40 billion makes for a nice headline but in the grand scheme of things, means very little....&quot;  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Quoted from Mr. Mortgage website.&lt;br/&gt;http://mrmortgage.ml-implode.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;.$40 billion is nothing. Below are real-time foreclosure stats for CA. Remember, CA is 35% of all defaults and foreclosures by count and 45% by dollar volume. While its nice to see this topic addressed $40 billion is not much considering int he state of CA, total Notice-of-Defaults and actual Foreclosures are averaging about $28 to $30 billion per month. This means on a national level, roughly $70 billion. Given this $40 billion makes for a nice headline but in the grand scheme of things, means very little&#8230;.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Quoted from Mr. Mortgage website.<br /><a href="http://mrmortgage.ml-implode.com/" rel="nofollow">http://mrmortgage.ml-implode.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/10/foreclosure-filings-rise-71-3q-2008-vs.html#comment-22767</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/10/foreclosure-filings-rise-71-3q-2008-vs-3q-2007/#comment-22767</guid>
		<description>Good question concerning USAA. I know they changed their membership requirement. Was, an officer in the military. Now, any military with a honorable discharge.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;With USAA offering insurance, investment and banking I doubt changing membership requirement was because everything is wonderful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good question concerning USAA. I know they changed their membership requirement. Was, an officer in the military. Now, any military with a honorable discharge.</p>
<p>With USAA offering insurance, investment and banking I doubt changing membership requirement was because everything is wonderful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juan Cristobal Federico Chihuahua de la Vega</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/10/foreclosure-filings-rise-71-3q-2008-vs.html#comment-22756</link>
		<dc:creator>Juan Cristobal Federico Chihuahua de la Vega</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 14:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/10/foreclosure-filings-rise-71-3q-2008-vs-3q-2007/#comment-22756</guid>
		<description>A bit tangential, but one bank I haven&#039;t heard about in terms of how they are weathering the financial and mortgage crises (ok, maybe it&#039;s just one crisis), is USAA. They seem pretty tight-lipped about their status. Any word out there on them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A bit tangential, but one bank I haven&#8217;t heard about in terms of how they are weathering the financial and mortgage crises (ok, maybe it&#8217;s just one crisis), is USAA. They seem pretty tight-lipped about their status. Any word out there on them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
