<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fed Hires Bear Stearns Risk Chief&#8230;To Supervise Bank Soundness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/11/fed-hires-bear-stearns-risk-chiefto.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/11/fed-hires-bear-stearns-risk-chiefto.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 07:56:24 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/11/fed-hires-bear-stearns-risk-chiefto.html#comment-24591</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 19:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/11/fed-hires-bear-stearns-risk-chiefto-supervise-bank-soundness/#comment-24591</guid>
		<description>reminds me of some of the other major blunders of our wonderful wall street execs http://undercoveronwallstreet.blogspot.com/2008/11/this-centurys-10-biggest-blunders-by.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reminds me of some of the other major blunders of our wonderful wall street execs <a href="http://undercoveronwallstreet.blogspot.com/2008/11/this-centurys-10-biggest-blunders-by.html" rel="nofollow">http://undercoveronwallstreet.blogspot.com/2008/11/this-centurys-10-biggest-blunders-by.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EconJournal</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/11/fed-hires-bear-stearns-risk-chiefto.html#comment-24407</link>
		<dc:creator>EconJournal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 03:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/11/fed-hires-bear-stearns-risk-chiefto-supervise-bank-soundness/#comment-24407</guid>
		<description>When Schwarzman of Blackstone is arguing for the need of  transparency in financial system, why not Bear Stearns guy be appointed as risk manager? The current period is never short of ironies.&lt;br/&gt;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122576100620095567.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Schwarzman of Blackstone is arguing for the need of  transparency in financial system, why not Bear Stearns guy be appointed as risk manager? The current period is never short of ironies.<br /><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122576100620095567.html" rel="nofollow">http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122576100620095567.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: baychev</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/11/fed-hires-bear-stearns-risk-chiefto.html#comment-24385</link>
		<dc:creator>baychev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 21:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/11/fed-hires-bear-stearns-risk-chiefto-supervise-bank-soundness/#comment-24385</guid>
		<description>a man with dignity who understands what he is doing would not let a company take excessive bets while he is supposed to ring the panic bell before the senior management and the SEC if he feels his concerns were not addressed adequately.&lt;br/&gt;so much for alix&#039; skills and competences. maybe the fed needs an obedient dog that will close his eyes and not escalate problems, maybe they need another clueless punk. but if they need someone to supervise, this certainly is not the man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a man with dignity who understands what he is doing would not let a company take excessive bets while he is supposed to ring the panic bell before the senior management and the SEC if he feels his concerns were not addressed adequately.<br />so much for alix&#8217; skills and competences. maybe the fed needs an obedient dog that will close his eyes and not escalate problems, maybe they need another clueless punk. but if they need someone to supervise, this certainly is not the man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt L</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/11/fed-hires-bear-stearns-risk-chiefto.html#comment-24376</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 18:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/11/fed-hires-bear-stearns-risk-chiefto-supervise-bank-soundness/#comment-24376</guid>
		<description>umm... Is it me or does it seem like the foxes have been hired to watch the hen houses? Its not just Alix after all, its the whole lot of them at the Fed and Treasury. Many of the experienced civil servants disappeared years ago and were replaced by political hacks and opportunists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>umm&#8230; Is it me or does it seem like the foxes have been hired to watch the hen houses? Its not just Alix after all, its the whole lot of them at the Fed and Treasury. Many of the experienced civil servants disappeared years ago and were replaced by political hacks and opportunists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sc</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/11/fed-hires-bear-stearns-risk-chiefto.html#comment-24371</link>
		<dc:creator>sc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 17:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/11/fed-hires-bear-stearns-risk-chiefto-supervise-bank-soundness/#comment-24371</guid>
		<description>Alix is one of the best risk managers I have ever met.  Mgmt of BSC is another story.  Just as economists in the Fed were telling Greenspan to regulate it doesn&#039;t mean management chooses to hear it.  Alix is an outstanding hire for the Fed and he is one guy that will not be BS&#039;ed by banks because he knows more than 99% of risk managers out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alix is one of the best risk managers I have ever met.  Mgmt of BSC is another story.  Just as economists in the Fed were telling Greenspan to regulate it doesn&#8217;t mean management chooses to hear it.  Alix is an outstanding hire for the Fed and he is one guy that will not be BS&#8217;ed by banks because he knows more than 99% of risk managers out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/11/fed-hires-bear-stearns-risk-chiefto.html#comment-24369</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 16:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/11/fed-hires-bear-stearns-risk-chiefto-supervise-bank-soundness/#comment-24369</guid>
		<description>Well, let&#039;s stop pretending that we do or do not know what Mr. Alix&#039;s aptitude for risk management.  Maybe he could be very good or maybe not.  The fact that he worked at Bear Stearns means that he was NEVER taken seriously or was window dressing.  That shop was built and run by their traders.  Thus, risk management, legal and accounting were glorified &quot;YES&quot; men and it was one big echo chamber since the traders were the only ones allowed to do the talking.  In a rising market, there was no risk as far as they were concerned.  Now, could Mr. Alix be a better risk manager than say a former commercial bank risk manager?  Absolutely, since he has seen much more products, hedging practices or trade ideas in the mortgage space than most.  He also saw what worked and what didn&#039;t so experience is nothing to dismiss.  However, let&#039;s not judge him as a savvy or awful manager of risk because he worked at Bear.  Whatever his opinions there, they more likely than not, would have been ignored.  Wonder who the other candidates were... and yes, they DO shoot messengers in DC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, let&#8217;s stop pretending that we do or do not know what Mr. Alix&#8217;s aptitude for risk management.  Maybe he could be very good or maybe not.  The fact that he worked at Bear Stearns means that he was NEVER taken seriously or was window dressing.  That shop was built and run by their traders.  Thus, risk management, legal and accounting were glorified &#8220;YES&#8221; men and it was one big echo chamber since the traders were the only ones allowed to do the talking.  In a rising market, there was no risk as far as they were concerned.  Now, could Mr. Alix be a better risk manager than say a former commercial bank risk manager?  Absolutely, since he has seen much more products, hedging practices or trade ideas in the mortgage space than most.  He also saw what worked and what didn&#8217;t so experience is nothing to dismiss.  However, let&#8217;s not judge him as a savvy or awful manager of risk because he worked at Bear.  Whatever his opinions there, they more likely than not, would have been ignored.  Wonder who the other candidates were&#8230; and yes, they DO shoot messengers in DC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walter</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/11/fed-hires-bear-stearns-risk-chiefto.html#comment-24365</link>
		<dc:creator>Walter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 15:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/11/fed-hires-bear-stearns-risk-chiefto-supervise-bank-soundness/#comment-24365</guid>
		<description>&quot;The fact that Bear failed doesn&#039;t mean that risk management failed. &quot;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;You can certainly argue that it wasn&#039;t a failure to recognize and report the risk (I have no idea on that count).&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;But &quot;risk management&quot; clearly failed spectacularly.  I can&#039;t say if the failure was one of recognition, communication, or influence.  But clearly the risk was not managed, so by definition failure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The fact that Bear failed doesn&#8217;t mean that risk management failed. &#8220;</p>
<p>You can certainly argue that it wasn&#8217;t a failure to recognize and report the risk (I have no idea on that count).</p>
<p>But &#8220;risk management&#8221; clearly failed spectacularly.  I can&#8217;t say if the failure was one of recognition, communication, or influence.  But clearly the risk was not managed, so by definition failure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joshyMinor</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/11/fed-hires-bear-stearns-risk-chiefto.html#comment-24360</link>
		<dc:creator>joshyMinor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 15:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/11/fed-hires-bear-stearns-risk-chiefto-supervise-bank-soundness/#comment-24360</guid>
		<description>Thats how it works under the Bush Regime! the rich get richer and the poor, well you know.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Jiff&lt;br/&gt;www.anolite.echoz.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats how it works under the Bush Regime! the rich get richer and the poor, well you know.</p>
<p>Jiff<br /><a href="http://www.anolite.echoz.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.anolite.echoz.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: River</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/11/fed-hires-bear-stearns-risk-chiefto.html#comment-24357</link>
		<dc:creator>River</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 14:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/11/fed-hires-bear-stearns-risk-chiefto-supervise-bank-soundness/#comment-24357</guid>
		<description>The US plans to market $500 Billion more in Treasuries this quarter. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Brad Setzer has some interesting comments about these sales:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;...snip...&#039;I would be surprised, though, if it is all bought by central banks. Or even if most of the new Treasury will be absorbed by central banks. For the first time in a long time, I suspect Americans — not the world’s central banks — will be the main source of new lending to the Treasury.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Why? The last few months have been marked by three trends:&#039;...snip...&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Maybe Alix should have been employed by Treasury?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The US plans to market $500 Billion more in Treasuries this quarter. </p>
<p>Brad Setzer has some interesting comments about these sales:</p>
<p>&#8230;snip&#8230;&#8217;I would be surprised, though, if it is all bought by central banks. Or even if most of the new Treasury will be absorbed by central banks. For the first time in a long time, I suspect Americans — not the world’s central banks — will be the main source of new lending to the Treasury.</p>
<p>Why? The last few months have been marked by three trends:&#8217;&#8230;snip&#8230;</p>
<p>Maybe Alix should have been employed by Treasury?</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/11/fed-hires-bear-stearns-risk-chiefto.html#comment-24355</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 14:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/11/fed-hires-bear-stearns-risk-chiefto-supervise-bank-soundness/#comment-24355</guid>
		<description>...there was no &quot;mast&quot; on the Titanic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;there was no &#8220;mast&#8221; on the Titanic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
