<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Links 12/14/08</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/links-121408.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/links-121408.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:58:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: CrocodileChuck</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/links-121408.html#comment-29309</link>
		<dc:creator>CrocodileChuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 04:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/links-121408/#comment-29309</guid>
		<description>Hey, Doc!&lt;br/&gt;Welcome back!&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;CrocodileChuck</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Doc!<br />Welcome back!</p>
<p>CrocodileChuck</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ndk</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/links-121408.html#comment-29306</link>
		<dc:creator>ndk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 04:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/links-121408/#comment-29306</guid>
		<description>Buiter&#039;s written a real gem.  I&#039;m in Florida taking care of my parents, but I&#039;m going to pick it over a few times, particularly given that he hits on a lot of the concerns I&#039;d expressed here.  Just here to applaud quickly before slipping back out into the night to walk some pier in some trailer park under one of those bad moons I always hear talk about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buiter&#8217;s written a real gem.  I&#8217;m in Florida taking care of my parents, but I&#8217;m going to pick it over a few times, particularly given that he hits on a lot of the concerns I&#8217;d expressed here.  Just here to applaud quickly before slipping back out into the night to walk some pier in some trailer park under one of those bad moons I always hear talk about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doc holiday</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/links-121408.html#comment-29285</link>
		<dc:creator>doc holiday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 00:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/links-121408/#comment-29285</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m done with my nap.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;FYI:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Louis Crandall, an economist with Wrightson ICAP LLC, a Wall Street money-market broker, says the Fed&#039;s interventions also have the potential to clog up the balance sheets of banks, its main intermediaries.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&quot;Finding alternative funding vehicles that bypass the banking system would be a more effective way to support the U.S. credit system,&quot; he says.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Some private economists worry that Fed-issued bonds could create new problems. Marvin Goodfriend, an economist at Carnegie Mellon University&#039;s Tepper School of Business and a former senior staffer at the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, said that issuing debt could put the Fed at odds with the Treasury at a time when it is already issuing mountains of debt itself.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&quot;It creates problems in coordinating the issuance of government debt,&quot; Mr. Goodfriend said. &quot;These would be very close cousins to existing Treasury bills. They would be competing in the same market to federal debt.&quot;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;With Treasury-bill rates now near zero, it seems unlikely that Fed debt would push Treasury rates much higher, but it could some day become an issue.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;There are also questions about the Fed&#039;s authority.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&gt;&gt;  I&#039;ll be back</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m done with my nap.</p>
<p>FYI:</p>
<p>Louis Crandall, an economist with Wrightson ICAP LLC, a Wall Street money-market broker, says the Fed&#39;s interventions also have the potential to clog up the balance sheets of banks, its main intermediaries.</p>
<p>&quot;Finding alternative funding vehicles that bypass the banking system would be a more effective way to support the U.S. credit system,&quot; he says.</p>
<p>Some private economists worry that Fed-issued bonds could create new problems. Marvin Goodfriend, an economist at Carnegie Mellon University&#39;s Tepper School of Business and a former senior staffer at the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, said that issuing debt could put the Fed at odds with the Treasury at a time when it is already issuing mountains of debt itself.</p>
<p>&quot;It creates problems in coordinating the issuance of government debt,&quot; Mr. Goodfriend said. &quot;These would be very close cousins to existing Treasury bills. They would be competing in the same market to federal debt.&quot;</p>
<p>With Treasury-bill rates now near zero, it seems unlikely that Fed debt would push Treasury rates much higher, but it could some day become an issue.</p>
<p>There are also questions about the Fed&#39;s authority.</p>
<p>&gt;&gt;  I&#39;ll be back</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/links-121408.html#comment-29284</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 00:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/links-121408/#comment-29284</guid>
		<description>Another take on Iceland ...&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Excerpt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&quot;The road to ruin for this snowy North Atlantic island, featuring a pit stop at Fort Worth&#039;s AMR Corp., was paved with American-style capitalism.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Over the last six years, a group of about two dozen young, U.S.-educated financiers took Iceland on a Viking voyage of acquisitions, grabbing airlines, banks, mortgage lenders and securities traders from Texas to Hong Kong.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;One of the new Vikings was Hannes Smárason, an MIT-educated McKinsey &amp; Co. veteran in his early 40s. In 2004, Mr. Smárason led a group of investors who bought Icelandair. The airline had a large cash pool to cushion it from shocks in fuel prices and ticket sales. Mr. Smárason, as head of a holding company called the FL Group, used that cash to go on a buying spree.&quot; &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/bus/stories/121108dnbusiceland.31cc1d2.html&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;i on the ball patriot</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another take on Iceland &#8230;</p>
<p>Excerpt;</p>
<p>&quot;The road to ruin for this snowy North Atlantic island, featuring a pit stop at Fort Worth&#39;s AMR Corp., was paved with American-style capitalism.</p>
<p>Over the last six years, a group of about two dozen young, U.S.-educated financiers took Iceland on a Viking voyage of acquisitions, grabbing airlines, banks, mortgage lenders and securities traders from Texas to Hong Kong.</p>
<p>One of the new Vikings was Hannes Smárason, an MIT-educated McKinsey &amp; Co. veteran in his early 40s. In 2004, Mr. Smárason led a group of investors who bought Icelandair. The airline had a large cash pool to cushion it from shocks in fuel prices and ticket sales. Mr. Smárason, as head of a holding company called the FL Group, used that cash to go on a buying spree.&quot; </p>
<p><a href="http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/bus/stories/121108dnbusiceland.31cc1d2.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/bus/stories/121108dnbusiceland.31cc1d2.html</a></p>
<p>i on the ball patriot</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mmckinl</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/links-121408.html#comment-29283</link>
		<dc:creator>mmckinl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 00:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/links-121408/#comment-29283</guid>
		<description>&quot;Chart du Jour: Bank Leverage Worldwide Paul Kedrosky&quot;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;~~~~&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Does the leverage of the US banks include toxic level 3 assets as capital ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Chart du Jour: Bank Leverage Worldwide Paul Kedrosky&#8221;</p>
<p>~~~~</p>
<p>Does the leverage of the US banks include toxic level 3 assets as capital ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/links-121408.html#comment-29277</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 22:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/links-121408/#comment-29277</guid>
		<description>Rogoff&#039;s blithely inane penultimate paragraph (all you need to cure inflation is &quot;good communications policy&quot;) completely undermines his argument and frankly makes him sound like a lightweight who hasn&#039;t thought anything through.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Annals of &quot;communications policy&quot;, July 15 2008 edition:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&quot;If you have a bazooka in your pocket and people know it, you probably won&#039;t have to use it.&quot; -- Hank Paulson&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Oops.  I seem to recall the markets called Paulson&#039;s bluff, and then some.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Once unleashed, inflation will roar, with apocalyptic consequences for the dollar and much else besides.  The worst part is, Rogoff may be right that this disastrous scenario is in fact the the lesser evil, since default is the only alternative.  Since a man of his accomplishments can&#039;t possibly be as obtuse as he comes across here, he is knowingly lying about the endgame because he couldn&#039;t sell it otherwise.  That&#039;s the trouble with lesser evils, though: in the end, they&#039;re still plenty evil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rogoff&#8217;s blithely inane penultimate paragraph (all you need to cure inflation is &#8220;good communications policy&#8221;) completely undermines his argument and frankly makes him sound like a lightweight who hasn&#8217;t thought anything through.</p>
<p>Annals of &#8220;communications policy&#8221;, July 15 2008 edition:</p>
<p>&#8220;If you have a bazooka in your pocket and people know it, you probably won&#8217;t have to use it.&#8221; &#8212; Hank Paulson</p>
<p>Oops.  I seem to recall the markets called Paulson&#8217;s bluff, and then some.</p>
<p>Once unleashed, inflation will roar, with apocalyptic consequences for the dollar and much else besides.  The worst part is, Rogoff may be right that this disastrous scenario is in fact the the lesser evil, since default is the only alternative.  Since a man of his accomplishments can&#8217;t possibly be as obtuse as he comes across here, he is knowingly lying about the endgame because he couldn&#8217;t sell it otherwise.  That&#8217;s the trouble with lesser evils, though: in the end, they&#8217;re still plenty evil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/links-121408.html#comment-29269</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 19:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/links-121408/#comment-29269</guid>
		<description>Ummm...buying your own stock at inflated prices is good for the sellers (executives and traders) and terrible for the long term shareholders.  I can assure you that putting the money in treasuries would have been far superior for the long term shareholders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ummm&#8230;buying your own stock at inflated prices is good for the sellers (executives and traders) and terrible for the long term shareholders.  I can assure you that putting the money in treasuries would have been far superior for the long term shareholders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Bissell</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/links-121408.html#comment-29266</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Bissell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 19:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/links-121408/#comment-29266</guid>
		<description>Jeez, you hope maybe Marc Faber was being a little melodramatic when he said central bankers would print money in a fit of &quot;insanity.&quot; Then you read guys like Buiter and Rogoff and realize they just might lead us over that cliff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeez, you hope maybe Marc Faber was being a little melodramatic when he said central bankers would print money in a fit of &#8220;insanity.&#8221; Then you read guys like Buiter and Rogoff and realize they just might lead us over that cliff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GloomBoom.com</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/links-121408.html#comment-29264</link>
		<dc:creator>GloomBoom.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 18:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/links-121408/#comment-29264</guid>
		<description>Mr. Rogoff is a dreamer. It is easy to induce an inflationary cycle but to put the brakes on is very difficult. Remember Volker and Carter? Good grief!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Rogoff is a dreamer. It is easy to induce an inflationary cycle but to put the brakes on is very difficult. Remember Volker and Carter? Good grief!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fresno dan</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/links-121408.html#comment-29252</link>
		<dc:creator>fresno dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 16:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/links-121408/#comment-29252</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with you &quot;Dave&quot;&lt;br/&gt;It wasn&#039;t that long ago (OK, it was) that dividends were the predominant reason for stock investing.  And cash can&#039;t lie was, and IMHO, still a good rationale for paying them.  &lt;br/&gt;The idea that every company can be an investment genius, and make more money doing that than by running their business, should be self evidentially ridiculous.  By booms and busts are made of such things.  I predict a strong comeback for the practice of paying dividends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with you &#8220;Dave&#8221;<br />It wasn&#8217;t that long ago (OK, it was) that dividends were the predominant reason for stock investing.  And cash can&#8217;t lie was, and IMHO, still a good rationale for paying them.  <br />The idea that every company can be an investment genius, and make more money doing that than by running their business, should be self evidentially ridiculous.  By booms and busts are made of such things.  I predict a strong comeback for the practice of paying dividends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
