<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Santa Left Retailers Lumps of Coal in Their Stockings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/santa-left-retailers-lumps-of-coal-in.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/santa-left-retailers-lumps-of-coal-in.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 09:23:14 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Glen</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/santa-left-retailers-lumps-of-coal-in.html#comment-30620</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 23:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/santa-left-retailers-lumps-of-coal-in-their-stockings/#comment-30620</guid>
		<description>Well aware of that viv - pulling the p**s. By reading and listening to MSM, one would think that we&#039;re somehow immune to world events even though our commodity life support system has been shut down by Dr China. We&#039;ve heading a record Christmas spend but these will be the same people looking to the government for yet another hand out next year when the bill comes in - old habits die hard. Even in today&#039;s SMH, local economists are predicting a rebound by June 09 even though unemployment will be on the up! Apparently all of these government infrastructure projects designed to save the economy will be underway by June 09 creating jobs jobs and more jobs. If anyone has had anything to do with Australian governments at any level will know that they&#039;ll still be navel gazing these project in June 10. So yes, there is a tenuous grip on reality by MSM&#039;s at best - just because the impact is not immediate doesn&#039;t mean it won&#039;t happen. By June 09, we&#039;ll be well and truly feeling the crunch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well aware of that viv &#8211; pulling the p**s. By reading and listening to MSM, one would think that we&#8217;re somehow immune to world events even though our commodity life support system has been shut down by Dr China. We&#8217;ve heading a record Christmas spend but these will be the same people looking to the government for yet another hand out next year when the bill comes in &#8211; old habits die hard. Even in today&#8217;s SMH, local economists are predicting a rebound by June 09 even though unemployment will be on the up! Apparently all of these government infrastructure projects designed to save the economy will be underway by June 09 creating jobs jobs and more jobs. If anyone has had anything to do with Australian governments at any level will know that they&#8217;ll still be navel gazing these project in June 10. So yes, there is a tenuous grip on reality by MSM&#8217;s at best &#8211; just because the impact is not immediate doesn&#8217;t mean it won&#8217;t happen. By June 09, we&#8217;ll be well and truly feeling the crunch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/santa-left-retailers-lumps-of-coal-in.html#comment-30599</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 17:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/santa-left-retailers-lumps-of-coal-in-their-stockings/#comment-30599</guid>
		<description>Retailers have suffered their worst Christmas sales in years and many are forced to declare bankruptcy. Some are asking the states to declare sales tax holidays so they can bring back customers and stay in business. But billions of those sales taxes help support the state. The states claim they cannot provide proper services without the help of sales taxes. The U.S. government is now being asked to reimburse the states if sales taxes are temporarily lifted. A large part of the trillion dollar stimulus package can be used for that purpose. Once again the public sector is coming to the aid of a private sector that is in trouble. It is like the tail wagging the dog or the cart carrying the mule. The dog and mule must be restored to their proper position if sanity can be maintained.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Retailers have suffered their worst Christmas sales in years and many are forced to declare bankruptcy. Some are asking the states to declare sales tax holidays so they can bring back customers and stay in business. But billions of those sales taxes help support the state. The states claim they cannot provide proper services without the help of sales taxes. The U.S. government is now being asked to reimburse the states if sales taxes are temporarily lifted. A large part of the trillion dollar stimulus package can be used for that purpose. Once again the public sector is coming to the aid of a private sector that is in trouble. It is like the tail wagging the dog or the cart carrying the mule. The dog and mule must be restored to their proper position if sanity can be maintained.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: viv</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/santa-left-retailers-lumps-of-coal-in.html#comment-30575</link>
		<dc:creator>viv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 07:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/santa-left-retailers-lumps-of-coal-in-their-stockings/#comment-30575</guid>
		<description>Nope, all good here in Fortress Ozz. Spend away, nothing see, spend on.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Oz is about 6-8 months behind America in terms of the crisis and it was only in july that commodities tanked and China started entering a recession in this quarter. No way is OZ escaping the worst of this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope, all good here in Fortress Ozz. Spend away, nothing see, spend on.</p>
<p>Oz is about 6-8 months behind America in terms of the crisis and it was only in july that commodities tanked and China started entering a recession in this quarter. No way is OZ escaping the worst of this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lune</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/santa-left-retailers-lumps-of-coal-in.html#comment-30568</link>
		<dc:creator>Lune</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 06:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/santa-left-retailers-lumps-of-coal-in-their-stockings/#comment-30568</guid>
		<description>Pet peeve time (not directed at you, Yves, but at the original sources):&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I can&#039;t stand reports that include/exclude various items with the sole purpose of finessing their final results.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Why exclude autos and gas this year, when last year&#039;s numbers included them? Yes, I understand that this year auto sales cratered, and gas prices are lower. But last year, everyone could see that auto sales were unnaturally front-loaded due to all the zero down/zero financing offers around, and gas prices were skyrocketing. But since that helps consumption numbers, they were left in.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Similarly, Bernanke always liked to use &quot;core&quot; inflation excluding food and energy. The ostensible reason is because food / energy prices are volatile. Except that for the last several years, until now, they weren&#039;t the least bit volatile, only going up, up, and up. But nevermind, Bernanke still excluded them. Now that commodity prices are easing, everyone talks about how this is relieving inflationary pressures. Where&#039;s &quot;core&quot; inflation now?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I say, live by the sword, die by the sword. If we&#039;re to have meaningful discussions of statistics, their definitions can&#039;t be changed year-to-year to fit the narrative of the day.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;In this case, what reason is there to exclude autos and gas? Auto purchases are a significant portion of our consumption, and have a huge impact on our economy. Why exclude them? Similarly, while spending on gas has declined, the fact that families didn&#039;t take the extra couple hundred dollars from gas savings and spend them elsewhere is an important fact.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;At any rate, what this means is that consumption is actually worse off than even these statistics make them seem. But of course, we can&#039;t have &lt;i&gt;accurate&lt;/i&gt; numbers out there lest the natives get a real idea of just how bad things are and start those bloody uprisings that they&#039;re wont to do from time to time. Nope, can&#039;t do that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pet peeve time (not directed at you, Yves, but at the original sources):</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t stand reports that include/exclude various items with the sole purpose of finessing their final results.</p>
<p>Why exclude autos and gas this year, when last year&#8217;s numbers included them? Yes, I understand that this year auto sales cratered, and gas prices are lower. But last year, everyone could see that auto sales were unnaturally front-loaded due to all the zero down/zero financing offers around, and gas prices were skyrocketing. But since that helps consumption numbers, they were left in.</p>
<p>Similarly, Bernanke always liked to use &#8220;core&#8221; inflation excluding food and energy. The ostensible reason is because food / energy prices are volatile. Except that for the last several years, until now, they weren&#8217;t the least bit volatile, only going up, up, and up. But nevermind, Bernanke still excluded them. Now that commodity prices are easing, everyone talks about how this is relieving inflationary pressures. Where&#8217;s &#8220;core&#8221; inflation now?</p>
<p>I say, live by the sword, die by the sword. If we&#8217;re to have meaningful discussions of statistics, their definitions can&#8217;t be changed year-to-year to fit the narrative of the day.</p>
<p>In this case, what reason is there to exclude autos and gas? Auto purchases are a significant portion of our consumption, and have a huge impact on our economy. Why exclude them? Similarly, while spending on gas has declined, the fact that families didn&#8217;t take the extra couple hundred dollars from gas savings and spend them elsewhere is an important fact.</p>
<p>At any rate, what this means is that consumption is actually worse off than even these statistics make them seem. But of course, we can&#8217;t have <i>accurate</i> numbers out there lest the natives get a real idea of just how bad things are and start those bloody uprisings that they&#8217;re wont to do from time to time. Nope, can&#8217;t do that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/santa-left-retailers-lumps-of-coal-in.html#comment-30562</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 03:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/santa-left-retailers-lumps-of-coal-in-their-stockings/#comment-30562</guid>
		<description>At least a couple of possibilities, neither one of which excludes the other:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;a. People aren&#039;t buying because they don&#039;t have money or credit (duh)&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;b. If we&#039;re truly in a deflationary period, people are waiting for prices to drop even further.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least a couple of possibilities, neither one of which excludes the other:</p>
<p>a. People aren&#8217;t buying because they don&#8217;t have money or credit (duh)</p>
<p>b. If we&#8217;re truly in a deflationary period, people are waiting for prices to drop even further.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 42</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/santa-left-retailers-lumps-of-coal-in.html#comment-30560</link>
		<dc:creator>42</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 01:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/santa-left-retailers-lumps-of-coal-in-their-stockings/#comment-30560</guid>
		<description>The so-called &quot;sales&quot; post-xmas are bullshit. All I&#039;ve seen so far are discounts on clothing and other huge-markup stuff like mattresses. I&#039;m in the market for a new camera, but I haven&#039;t seen any decent deals on those.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The so-called &#8220;sales&#8221; post-xmas are bullshit. All I&#8217;ve seen so far are discounts on clothing and other huge-markup stuff like mattresses. I&#8217;m in the market for a new camera, but I haven&#8217;t seen any decent deals on those.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/santa-left-retailers-lumps-of-coal-in.html#comment-30559</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 23:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/santa-left-retailers-lumps-of-coal-in-their-stockings/#comment-30559</guid>
		<description>Sales taxes feed a hungry state at the expense of low wage workers who are barely surviving. The state should cut salaries of overpaid employees and lay off those that are not needed. But it is easier to bully the poor and weak by using the sales tax. According to a leading Sex prevention Service U.S. singular condom sales are running at one trillion rubbers annually. This data suggest that Americans are using more condoms in response to higher child raising costs and AIDS education. That news will be a golden opportunity for states that are searching to find the right sin tax to erase high budget deficits. 5 bucks a condom would be a fair sin tax. If combined with a higher tax for those that use motel rooms for illicit sex it would be the largest state tax increase since the civil war. Not only would it solve the state budget deficits but it would also make religious leaders happy---family values would once again become holy and pre-marital sex curtailed.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;States must have money to pay their operating costs. Most of those expenses are paid by workers who send in a part of their wages to the state annually.  But there are  many low income wage earners that cannot afford state payroll taxes and they are given an exemption.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;It is outrageous to have a minimum wage worker being forced to pay a sales tax on soap and toilet paper. Having to go to work smelly and dirty unless that tax is paid sounds like extortion. This law must be abolished at once. The state claims that they cannot provide proper services without taxes on detergents and paper goods. They say that billions of dollars in sales taxes are collected on toilet paper alone. This issue should be taken up by the new administration in Washington. A large part of the trillion dollar stimulus package should be given to the states that lift this filthy sales tax---it smells.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sales taxes feed a hungry state at the expense of low wage workers who are barely surviving. The state should cut salaries of overpaid employees and lay off those that are not needed. But it is easier to bully the poor and weak by using the sales tax. According to a leading Sex prevention Service U.S. singular condom sales are running at one trillion rubbers annually. This data suggest that Americans are using more condoms in response to higher child raising costs and AIDS education. That news will be a golden opportunity for states that are searching to find the right sin tax to erase high budget deficits. 5 bucks a condom would be a fair sin tax. If combined with a higher tax for those that use motel rooms for illicit sex it would be the largest state tax increase since the civil war. Not only would it solve the state budget deficits but it would also make religious leaders happy&#8212;family values would once again become holy and pre-marital sex curtailed.</p>
<p>States must have money to pay their operating costs. Most of those expenses are paid by workers who send in a part of their wages to the state annually.  But there are  many low income wage earners that cannot afford state payroll taxes and they are given an exemption.</p>
<p>It is outrageous to have a minimum wage worker being forced to pay a sales tax on soap and toilet paper. Having to go to work smelly and dirty unless that tax is paid sounds like extortion. This law must be abolished at once. The state claims that they cannot provide proper services without taxes on detergents and paper goods. They say that billions of dollars in sales taxes are collected on toilet paper alone. This issue should be taken up by the new administration in Washington. A large part of the trillion dollar stimulus package should be given to the states that lift this filthy sales tax&#8212;it smells.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/santa-left-retailers-lumps-of-coal-in.html#comment-30556</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 22:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/santa-left-retailers-lumps-of-coal-in-their-stockings/#comment-30556</guid>
		<description>Retailers Want In on Stimulus Plan&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The country&#039;s largest retail trade association asked President-elect Barack Obama Tuesday to add a series of sales tax-exempt shopping days to a coming economic stimulus package in an effort to revive consumer confidence and spur spending.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The National Retail Federation called for three periods of sales tax-free shopping that would last 10 days each in March, July and October 2009. The trade group estimates that it would save consumers about $20 billion, or $175 per family.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Under the industry group&#039;s proposal, which would exclude alcohol and tobacco sales, the federal government would reimburse states for the lost tax revenue. State sales tax rates range from 2.9% to 7.25%, the group said. The five states without a sales tax -- Alaska, Delaware, Montana, New Hampshire and Oregon -- would also receive monies.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123007573825931553.html&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Bet they get it since the whole scam now by the FED ant the treasury is going to be based on dollar devaluation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Retailers Want In on Stimulus Plan</p>
<p>The country&#8217;s largest retail trade association asked President-elect Barack Obama Tuesday to add a series of sales tax-exempt shopping days to a coming economic stimulus package in an effort to revive consumer confidence and spur spending.</p>
<p>The National Retail Federation called for three periods of sales tax-free shopping that would last 10 days each in March, July and October 2009. The trade group estimates that it would save consumers about $20 billion, or $175 per family.</p>
<p>Under the industry group&#8217;s proposal, which would exclude alcohol and tobacco sales, the federal government would reimburse states for the lost tax revenue. State sales tax rates range from 2.9% to 7.25%, the group said. The five states without a sales tax &#8212; Alaska, Delaware, Montana, New Hampshire and Oregon &#8212; would also receive monies.</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123007573825931553.html" rel="nofollow">http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123007573825931553.html</a></p>
<p>Bet they get it since the whole scam now by the FED ant the treasury is going to be based on dollar devaluation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/santa-left-retailers-lumps-of-coal-in.html#comment-30555</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 22:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/santa-left-retailers-lumps-of-coal-in-their-stockings/#comment-30555</guid>
		<description>I predict that the market will crash soon after Obama takes office.  The oligarchs are propping it up so it doesn&#039;t tank under Shrub&#039;s watch...plausable denial of complicity for the R&#039;s.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Einstein said, &quot;We can&#039;t solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we&lt;br/&gt;created them.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I predict that the market will crash soon after Obama takes office.  The oligarchs are propping it up so it doesn&#8217;t tank under Shrub&#8217;s watch&#8230;plausable denial of complicity for the R&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Einstein said, &#8220;We can&#8217;t solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we<br />created them.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mmckinl</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/santa-left-retailers-lumps-of-coal-in.html#comment-30552</link>
		<dc:creator>mmckinl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 21:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/santa-left-retailers-lumps-of-coal-in-their-stockings/#comment-30552</guid>
		<description>Jut a taste of what&#039;s to come ...&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The U.S. is heading into a Depression ... these holiday sales figures are but the precursor to more bad news ahead. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;An economy that is 70% consumption and 30% production cannot survive ... An aggregate debt of 50 trillion hangs over our economy ... a debt that has now become unpayable. Huge write-offs are what is on the menu and with fractional reserve banking run by Zombie Banks and a corrupted Federal Reserve the future is dark indeed ...&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jut a taste of what&#8217;s to come &#8230;</p>
<p>The U.S. is heading into a Depression &#8230; these holiday sales figures are but the precursor to more bad news ahead. </p>
<p><b>An economy that is 70% consumption and 30% production cannot survive &#8230; An aggregate debt of 50 trillion hangs over our economy &#8230; a debt that has now become unpayable. Huge write-offs are what is on the menu and with fractional reserve banking run by Zombie Banks and a corrupted Federal Reserve the future is dark indeed &#8230;</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
