<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wage Deflation Underway</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/wage-deflation-underway.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/wage-deflation-underway.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:09:47 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: john bougearel</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/wage-deflation-underway.html#comment-30247</link>
		<dc:creator>john bougearel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 04:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/wage-deflation-underway/#comment-30247</guid>
		<description>From the FairEconomist: &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&quot;How can anybody support deflation? Is 350% of GDP in debt not enough for you?&quot;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I thought it worth pulling out of your post and letting it just stand out. Wouldn&#039;t it be wonderful if the rest of economy (outside banks) could write-down 40% if their total debts. Might make managing the debt situation more manageable. I am sure this would require a capital injection directly from the US Treasury to recapitalize over-indebted Americans who were encouraged or shall we say induced by the lenders to borrow to their hearts content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the FairEconomist: </p>
<p>&#8220;How can anybody support deflation? Is 350% of GDP in debt not enough for you?&#8221;</p>
<p>I thought it worth pulling out of your post and letting it just stand out. Wouldn&#8217;t it be wonderful if the rest of economy (outside banks) could write-down 40% if their total debts. Might make managing the debt situation more manageable. I am sure this would require a capital injection directly from the US Treasury to recapitalize over-indebted Americans who were encouraged or shall we say induced by the lenders to borrow to their hearts content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/wage-deflation-underway.html#comment-30236</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 01:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/wage-deflation-underway/#comment-30236</guid>
		<description>...but will wages rise as fast as they fall once conditions return to semi-normal? Wage manipulation by corporations is the best weapon in ensuring that labour never gains a bigger share of the economic pie and in times like this, corporates are able to claim a large slice of the pie. Corporates cry &#039;wage cuts&#039; to ensure the companies survival yet protest against wage increases as inflationary. There is some merit to cutting wages to save jobs but give the history of corporates, trust to the right thing is non existent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;but will wages rise as fast as they fall once conditions return to semi-normal? Wage manipulation by corporations is the best weapon in ensuring that labour never gains a bigger share of the economic pie and in times like this, corporates are able to claim a large slice of the pie. Corporates cry &#8216;wage cuts&#8217; to ensure the companies survival yet protest against wage increases as inflationary. There is some merit to cutting wages to save jobs but give the history of corporates, trust to the right thing is non existent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/wage-deflation-underway.html#comment-30222</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 22:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/wage-deflation-underway/#comment-30222</guid>
		<description>&quot;I will take a 4 day workweek over a salary cut any time. If you are going pay me less, at least don&#039;t expect me to work as hard.&quot;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Well, as a manager, a 4 day workweek would mean doing 5 days of work in 4 days...still the expectation...but I guess that would be OK.  More time to volunteer or spend with the children.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I will take a 4 day workweek over a salary cut any time. If you are going pay me less, at least don&#8217;t expect me to work as hard.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, as a manager, a 4 day workweek would mean doing 5 days of work in 4 days&#8230;still the expectation&#8230;but I guess that would be OK.  More time to volunteer or spend with the children.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bendal</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/wage-deflation-underway.html#comment-30220</link>
		<dc:creator>Bendal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 22:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/wage-deflation-underway/#comment-30220</guid>
		<description>I work for a state agency; we&#039;ve been told that due to falling tax revenue amounts we may be forced next year to take a 10% pay cut in the form of working only 36 hours/week (4 9 hour days).&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Needless to say, no one&#039;s buying big ticket items, no one&#039;s looking to buy homes, no one&#039;s spending a lot for Christmas, and everyone&#039;s taking a bunker mentality.  This isn&#039;t definite yet, but everyone&#039;s taking a &quot;if it is, let&#039;s prepare now&quot; attitude.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I work for a state agency; we&#8217;ve been told that due to falling tax revenue amounts we may be forced next year to take a 10% pay cut in the form of working only 36 hours/week (4 9 hour days).</p>
<p>Needless to say, no one&#8217;s buying big ticket items, no one&#8217;s looking to buy homes, no one&#8217;s spending a lot for Christmas, and everyone&#8217;s taking a bunker mentality.  This isn&#8217;t definite yet, but everyone&#8217;s taking a &#8220;if it is, let&#8217;s prepare now&#8221; attitude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/wage-deflation-underway.html#comment-30216</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 22:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/wage-deflation-underway/#comment-30216</guid>
		<description>&quot;But, say a 30% to 40% fall in the dollar means considerably higher energy and food prices, which hit the vulnerable particularly hard&quot;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;If that means Joe SixPack has to eat less and take a bike to work, he might actually get a six-pack where it belongs..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;But, say a 30% to 40% fall in the dollar means considerably higher energy and food prices, which hit the vulnerable particularly hard&#8221;</p>
<p>If that means Joe SixPack has to eat less and take a bike to work, he might actually get a six-pack where it belongs..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpaceFury</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/wage-deflation-underway.html#comment-30214</link>
		<dc:creator>SpaceFury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 21:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/wage-deflation-underway/#comment-30214</guid>
		<description>Esp. in reference to FairEconomist&#039;s deflation terror:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;What is supposed to be so scary is that deflation means that people&#039;s debts increase while their incomes decrease...making it progressively harder to for them to pay the debts back, right?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Well, if that&#039;s truly the primary fear, why the focus on the absolute value of the inflation rate (positive vs negative)?  The fact is, debts have been increasing FASTER than incomes for many years, much faster than low, but positive, inflation.  That&#039;s how we even got to 350% in the first place!&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Only now that the absolute value of the inflation rate is turning negative, and suddenly we&#039;re scared stiff (even though we&#039;re not actually adding to private debt much any longer)???&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;We&#039;ve been focused on the wrong statistics all along.  If we accumulated debt at a rate of 20% faster than income growth, and now we get wage deflation of -5%, say, but add no more debt (or even pay down 2%), seems to me we&#039;re well past the peak of the problem we&#039;re so frightened of.  But this also means we&#039;re already in the hole in terms of paying back our debts.  A minor wage deflation won&#039;t make much further difference.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;What do you think, FairEconomist?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Esp. in reference to FairEconomist&#8217;s deflation terror:</p>
<p>What is supposed to be so scary is that deflation means that people&#8217;s debts increase while their incomes decrease&#8230;making it progressively harder to for them to pay the debts back, right?</p>
<p>Well, if that&#8217;s truly the primary fear, why the focus on the absolute value of the inflation rate (positive vs negative)?  The fact is, debts have been increasing FASTER than incomes for many years, much faster than low, but positive, inflation.  That&#8217;s how we even got to 350% in the first place!</p>
<p>Only now that the absolute value of the inflation rate is turning negative, and suddenly we&#8217;re scared stiff (even though we&#8217;re not actually adding to private debt much any longer)???</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve been focused on the wrong statistics all along.  If we accumulated debt at a rate of 20% faster than income growth, and now we get wage deflation of -5%, say, but add no more debt (or even pay down 2%), seems to me we&#8217;re well past the peak of the problem we&#8217;re so frightened of.  But this also means we&#8217;re already in the hole in terms of paying back our debts.  A minor wage deflation won&#8217;t make much further difference.</p>
<p>What do you think, FairEconomist?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/wage-deflation-underway.html#comment-30186</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 16:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/wage-deflation-underway/#comment-30186</guid>
		<description>In regards to tax-hike proposals in the US, proposals to reinvigorate labour, and the possibility of Wall Street ultimatums (we&#039;ve already seen them in Canada with ABCP holders), how does capital flight/ tax havens figure into this scenario? &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;ignorantmike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In regards to tax-hike proposals in the US, proposals to reinvigorate labour, and the possibility of Wall Street ultimatums (we&#8217;ve already seen them in Canada with ABCP holders), how does capital flight/ tax havens figure into this scenario? </p>
<p>ignorantmike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FairEconomist</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/wage-deflation-underway.html#comment-30185</link>
		<dc:creator>FairEconomist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 15:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/wage-deflation-underway/#comment-30185</guid>
		<description>In the current circumstances, deflation is disaster. We already have too much debt - for everybody. As we deflate, the debt *increases* in real terms. How can anybody support deflation? Is 350% of GDP in debt not enough for you?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I find the current situation terrifying. We have massive bankruptcies, a liquidity trap going on 2 months now and spreading up to higher and higher durations, and now anecdotal reports of wage deflation. That&#039;s Fisher&#039;s debt deflation cycle: more real debt causes more bankruptcies which shrinks the economy which causes deflation which increase the (real) debt burden which ...  Once it&#039;s on it can continue forever based on historical results. All the countries in the Great Depression continued down without limit until they did a massive devaluation.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The problem is complicated by the fact that nobody knows what money is right now. M1 isn&#039;t deflating, yet, although it&#039;s close. M2 is still increasing. But all the evidence is that we are deflating, at least in the Fisherian sense, so it seems we don&#039;t have a good measure. That&#039;s really not a shock to anybody who&#039;s been paying attention for the past 20 years - monetarist theory stopped working in the 80&#039;s and changes in what &quot;money&quot; is are the standard explanation. But it&#039;s still a problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the current circumstances, deflation is disaster. We already have too much debt &#8211; for everybody. As we deflate, the debt *increases* in real terms. How can anybody support deflation? Is 350% of GDP in debt not enough for you?</p>
<p>I find the current situation terrifying. We have massive bankruptcies, a liquidity trap going on 2 months now and spreading up to higher and higher durations, and now anecdotal reports of wage deflation. That&#8217;s Fisher&#8217;s debt deflation cycle: more real debt causes more bankruptcies which shrinks the economy which causes deflation which increase the (real) debt burden which &#8230;  Once it&#8217;s on it can continue forever based on historical results. All the countries in the Great Depression continued down without limit until they did a massive devaluation.</p>
<p>The problem is complicated by the fact that nobody knows what money is right now. M1 isn&#8217;t deflating, yet, although it&#8217;s close. M2 is still increasing. But all the evidence is that we are deflating, at least in the Fisherian sense, so it seems we don&#8217;t have a good measure. That&#8217;s really not a shock to anybody who&#8217;s been paying attention for the past 20 years &#8211; monetarist theory stopped working in the 80&#8217;s and changes in what &#8220;money&#8221; is are the standard explanation. But it&#8217;s still a problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fraud Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/wage-deflation-underway.html#comment-30179</link>
		<dc:creator>Fraud Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 14:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/wage-deflation-underway/#comment-30179</guid>
		<description>Also, re the 3.7% increase in hourly pay--wasn&#039;t there an increase in the minimum wage in the past year?  If so, that 3.7 is probably tied in no small part to the mandatory raise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, re the 3.7% increase in hourly pay&#8211;wasn&#8217;t there an increase in the minimum wage in the past year?  If so, that 3.7 is probably tied in no small part to the mandatory raise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gentlemutt</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/wage-deflation-underway.html#comment-30177</link>
		<dc:creator>Gentlemutt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 14:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/wage-deflation-underway/#comment-30177</guid>
		<description>The comments here about wage deflation echo the post-&#039;29 crash era. One small anecdote: my grandfather was lead Customer&#039;s Man for a brokerage house in Chicago in 1929.  During the 1920s he followed the rich crowd down to Florida in the winter and telegraphed in their commodity and stock orders. When business first slowed he tried to get his colleagues, themselves skilled telegraphers with customer relationships, to share jobs and accept a 4-day workweek on the basis that 50 families with 80% salary was better than 40 with 100% and 10 with none. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;His colleagues did not go for it, and he literally turned out the lights a few years later.  Your &#039;beggar thy neighbor&#039; thread today touches on the same impulse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The comments here about wage deflation echo the post-&#8217;29 crash era. One small anecdote: my grandfather was lead Customer&#8217;s Man for a brokerage house in Chicago in 1929.  During the 1920s he followed the rich crowd down to Florida in the winter and telegraphed in their commodity and stock orders. When business first slowed he tried to get his colleagues, themselves skilled telegraphers with customer relationships, to share jobs and accept a 4-day workweek on the basis that 50 families with 80% salary was better than 40 with 100% and 10 with none. </p>
<p>His colleagues did not go for it, and he literally turned out the lights a few years later.  Your &#8216;beggar thy neighbor&#8217; thread today touches on the same impulse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
