<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chrysler Can&#8217;t Make Cars Yet, Needs to Secure Access to Tools</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2009/06/chrysler-cant-make-cars-yet-needs-to.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2009/06/chrysler-cant-make-cars-yet-needs-to.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 06:07:28 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2009/06/chrysler-cant-make-cars-yet-needs-to.html#comment-49383</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 12:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2009/06/chrysler-cant-make-cars-yet-needs-to-secure-access-to-tools/#comment-49383</guid>
		<description>I work for a big Chrysler supplier. I won&#039;t say much, but the story&#039;s spot on.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Rick, with all due respect, you&#039;re clueless on the situation. A few suppliers have some power, my company got a seat on the new board alongside FIAT, the UAW, and the U.S. and Canadian governments, but most have little say and are in such a bad business situation themselves that they&#039;ll be forced to take whatever they&#039;re given. Suppliers are going down left and right right now and that&#039;s causing major problems for all automakers, not just GM and Chrysler.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I work for a big Chrysler supplier. I won&#39;t say much, but the story&#39;s spot on.</p>
<p>Rick, with all due respect, you&#39;re clueless on the situation. A few suppliers have some power, my company got a seat on the new board alongside FIAT, the UAW, and the U.S. and Canadian governments, but most have little say and are in such a bad business situation themselves that they&#39;ll be forced to take whatever they&#39;re given. Suppliers are going down left and right right now and that&#39;s causing major problems for all automakers, not just GM and Chrysler.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2009/06/chrysler-cant-make-cars-yet-needs-to.html#comment-49372</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 01:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2009/06/chrysler-cant-make-cars-yet-needs-to-secure-access-to-tools/#comment-49372</guid>
		<description>The big three aren&#039;t the huge vertically integrated (self contained) monsters that they used to be. Now that they&#039;ve outsourced most parts production, they&#039;re more like final assemblers. Any one of those suppliers has an effective veto power on the restart if they think they&#039;re going to get screwed. The thing is that even if they wanted to take a beating, they couldn&#039;t financially. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It&#039;s become common now  for big companies to string vendors out to as far as net 120! When your key suppliers are that dependent on huge amounts of nearly free credit, market tightness alone can kill them. Neglect and abuse guarantees it. I predict that all three BK&#039;s (Ford will go down on 12-24 months) stall simply because their supply chains will have evaporated by the time the get around to needing them again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The big three aren&#39;t the huge vertically integrated (self contained) monsters that they used to be. Now that they&#39;ve outsourced most parts production, they&#39;re more like final assemblers. Any one of those suppliers has an effective veto power on the restart if they think they&#39;re going to get screwed. The thing is that even if they wanted to take a beating, they couldn&#39;t financially. </p>
<p>It&#39;s become common now  for big companies to string vendors out to as far as net 120! When your key suppliers are that dependent on huge amounts of nearly free credit, market tightness alone can kill them. Neglect and abuse guarantees it. I predict that all three BK&#39;s (Ford will go down on 12-24 months) stall simply because their supply chains will have evaporated by the time the get around to needing them again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
