<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>naked capitalism</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.nakedcapitalism.com</provider_url><author_name>Lambert Strether</author_name><author_url>https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/author/lambert-strether</author_url><title>Opposition to ObamaCare Considered Rational on Grounds of Equity | naked capitalism</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="ePDG6lvGdF"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2013/08/opposition-to-obamacare-considered-rational-on-grounds-of-equity.html"&gt;Opposition to ObamaCare Considered Rational on Grounds of Equity&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2013/08/opposition-to-obamacare-considered-rational-on-grounds-of-equity.html/embed#?secret=ePDG6lvGdF" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;Opposition to ObamaCare Considered Rational on Grounds of Equity&#x201D; &#x2014; naked capitalism" data-secret="ePDG6lvGdF" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script type="text/javascript"&gt;
/* &lt;![CDATA[ */
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
/* ]]&gt; */
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><description>From his latest presser, Obama's partisan perspective on ObamaCare: [OBAMA:] Now, I think the really interesting question is why it is that my friends in the other party have made the idea of preventing these people from getting health care their holy grail, their number-one priority.  However, from the public purpose perspective, the really interesting question is why our "friends" in both parties refuse to put truly universal coverage -- for example, single payer Medicare for All -- on the table at all. Remember, ObamaCare is, pathetically, projected to enroll only 7 million people in its first year, and when fully implemented will leave about as many uninsured as newly insured -- 25 or 30 million, but with "these people," who's counting?</description><thumbnail_url>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/400_1.jpg</thumbnail_url></oembed>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Page Caching using memcached (REST request) 

Served from: www.nakedcapitalism.com @ 2024-03-31 19:04:00 by W3 Total Cache
-->