Category Archives: Banking industry

Journal vs. Financial Times on HSH-UBS Subprime Dispute

From time to time, there are marked disparities in how events are reported in the Wall Street Journal and the Financial Times. In the overwhelming majority of times, it’s the Journal’s reporting that’s deficient. Today’s sighting fits the classic pattern. The difference in headlines says it all. The Journal’s is: “German Bank Blames UBS for […]

Read more...

Standard Chartered Drops Plans to Rescue $7.15 Billion SIV

Standard Chartered abandoned plans to support its SIV, which is already in receivership. It is likely to default on its February 15 payment (it has three business days to cure the default). While this development is not expected to hurt either the bank or the marketplace, it’s another indicator that some institutions are less concerned […]

Read more...

Northern Rock Nationalization: The Best of Bad Options

With conventional wisdom holding that private sector solutions are better than public stewardship, to have the government winding up owning a financial institution looks bad. It revives the memories of the regulatory failures that led the bank to be bailed out in the first place. Oddly, though, Northern Rock could have been allowed to collapse […]

Read more...

Monoline Death Watch: Breaking Up is Hard to Do

Be careful what you wish for. New York insurance superintendent Eric Dinallo seems to be getting what he wants. FGIC, the number four bond insurer, was downgraded six grades by Moody’s on Thursday, from Aaa to A3, which meant it has lost its AAA rating from all agencies, and Moody’s warned it could be downgraded […]

Read more...

UBS: Banks at Risk for $203 Billion in Writedowns

Credit market troubles have the potential to cause considerably more damage to bank balance sheets. A UBS analyst tallies the possible hits as $203 billion, with fallout from the deterioration of bond insurer guarantees as the biggest source of risk. From Bloomberg: The world’s banks “remain at risk” of up to $203 billion in additional […]

Read more...

Hedge Funds Questioning the Soundness of Investment Banks

In a sign of how dramatic the reversals of fortune have been on Wall Street, hedge funds, until recently considered the riskiest players in the financial services industry, are now questioning how safe it is to leave cash and securities with their prime brokers, the securities firms that provide credit, brokerage, clearing, and sometimes fund […]

Read more...

Bankers: The New Socialists (Real Estate Bailout Edition)

We’ve often observed that the reason to keep the banking industry (and Wall Street, now that some firms are too big to fail) on a short leash is that it plays with the public’s money: gains go to employees and shareholders but losses are socialized. We now see a bald-faced example of that problem in […]

Read more...

Leveraged Loans: Where Have All the Buyers Gone?

We’re going to be a bit brief this evening. The Financial Times has a useful item in its Lex column which explains why leveraged loans, despite their seemingly rich pricing, are going begging: It has been a terrible period for leveraged loan prices – worse than for high-yield bonds despite the unsecured nature of the […]

Read more...

Hope Now = False Hope

The Hope Now Alliance, a plan brokered by Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson to get mortgage servicers to freeze introductory ARM rates for a narrowly-defined set of subprime borrowers, was roundly attacked by many borrower advocate groups. Their estimates of how many people it would help ranged from 15,000 to 145,00, and were attacked by the […]

Read more...

Grading Central Bank Performance in the Credit Crisis

The Financial Times has an interesting piece today by Chris Giles and Gillian Tett, “Lessons of the credit crunch.” The world’s top central bankers have learned that their traditional policy tools haven’t worked as well as they would have liked. So how to judge the job they have done? The FT story fails to address […]

Read more...