Financial Times Joins the Party on CalPERS (and Links to Naked Capitalism)
So, it’s not just Fortune and the Wall Street Journal; now it’s the FT piling on!
Read more...So, it’s not just Fortune and the Wall Street Journal; now it’s the FT piling on!
Read more...CalPERS reveals all. Not.
Read more...Dan Primack of Fortune has weighed in on what he calls the private equity “mess” at CalPERS, in an important new story, “CalPERS still can’t get out of its own way on private equity.”
Read more...CalPERS Chief Investment Officer made statements to the Investment Committee that are demonstrably false. As a video of the August Investment Committee meeting shows, Eliopoulos apparently does not grasp how a common tax avoidance scheme by general partners is not beneficial to limited partners. Even worse, he failed to mention that the IRS has recently proposed rules to end this tax abuse.
Read more...The oversimplifications, mistakes, and refusals to answer basic questions by CalPERS staff members at the last Investment Committee meeting of its board suggest that CalPERS has so little understanding of private equity that it cannot responsibly invest in that strategy at all. These errors related to concepts that are fundamental to understanding the economics of a private equity investments and hence to negotiating them.
Read more...Over the course of the last Investment Committee meeting of the CalPERS Board of Directors, many of the statements made by senior members of CalPERS’ investment staff showed a lack of understanding of basic issues, such as the industry’s economics and how widely-used contract terms operate.
Read more...Senior private equity professionals at CalPERS do not understand the economics of private equity funds, raising questions about the staff’s competence.
Read more...There’s so much chicanery afoot in private equity that I sometimes don’t write about important aspects on a timely basis. One of the big ones that most investors manage to kid themselves about is how the general partners’ fee structures really work. The widely-cherished fantasy is that the prototypical 2% annual management fee (the “2” […]
Read more...A new paper by Brian Chingono and Dan Rasmussen shows how to beat the average private equity fund’s return by a solid margin.
Read more...Bloomberg runs our op ed on how private equity investors have been so feckless that they deserve to lose their accredited investor status.
Read more...Pension consulting firm PCA tells some real howlers in trying to defend the failure of public pension funds like CalPERS to report the “carry fees” they pay.
Read more...By challenging the private equity secrecy and fee-gouging regimes, a major Dutch pension fund shows how craven its US counterparts are.
Read more...As one tax expert put it, “Private equity is a tax gimmick with an acquisition attached.” We’re going to discuss a very big tax gimmick that virtually no private equity investors seem to be aware of. The failure of private equity general partners to publicize a tax scheme that on paper should benefit their limited […]
Read more...Winning a battle in the long campaign against TPP: It was “domestic politics” that preserved our national sovereignty
Read more...The scandal over CalPERS’ failure to track “carry fees” has the industry worried enough that it is offering up ludicrous rationalizations.
Read more...