Category Archives: The dismal science

British Discussion of the Politics of Wellbeing

Below we have an extended except from “The Road to Happiness” by Derek Draper in The Guardian’s online commentary section. I find it intriguing that the question of social wellbeing has come to the point of being worthy of consideration in the House of Commons. Americans are stereotyped as touchy-feely and navel-gazing, but the Brits […]

Read more...

Martin Wolf: Economists Need to Wake Up and Smell the Coffee

Well, that isn’t exactly what he says, but close. Martin Wolf, the Financial Times’ chief economics editor, in his February 6 commentary, “In spite of sceptics, it is worth reducing climate risk,” says that economists are the big skeptics about global warming, and the possible consequences are too dire for them to continue to take […]

Read more...

"Markets Are Not Magic"

An excellent post by Mark Thoma in his Economist’s View, which although it was prompted by a post about Ayn Rand, could just have easily been in response to the New York Times’ lead story today, “In Washington, Contractors Play Biggest Role Ever.” Thoma discusses what markets are good for (efficiency, not equity), and what […]

Read more...

The Limitations of Economics and Models

In an interesting bit of synchronicity, an Economist piece today on the advances and limitations of economics as a discipline contrasts with a news item on the pseudo science of certain types of hucksterism, eh, modeling. The Economist’s Free Exchange section discusses the limitations of the dismal science in being able to assess the possible […]

Read more...