Category Archives: The dismal science

The Truth About Free Trade: Small Net Gain, Big Redistribution

Consider the ironies in the discussion of free trade. It’s widely depicted by economists to be a good thing, and anyone who opposed it is considered to be economically illiterate. Yet the system we have deviates considerably from the free trade ideal and is more accurately called managed trade. And in this system of managed […]

Read more...

Dani Rodrik Questions Conventional Wisdom on Labor Market Rigidities

Harvard’s Dani Rodrik in a recent post questioned the role of labor market rigidities (such as restrictions on firings and generous unemployment) in Europe’s higher unemployment. (As an aside, readers will know even that factoid is disputed. Barry Ritholtz has argued that if we calculated unemployment the same way Europeans did, the rates wouldn’t be […]

Read more...

Brad DeLong Argues That Central Banks Should Cut Interest Rates

It’s always dangerous for mere mortals to take issue with Serious Economists, but let’s start with Brad DeLong’s thesis (hat tip Mark Thoma): The fact that there is even a small liquidity crunch for banks implies larger liquidity crunches for less intensively regulated financial institutions, and even greater liquidity crunches for manufacturing and real-estate companies. […]

Read more...

Update From the Man Who Popularized "Minsky Moment"

George Magnus, senior economics adviser at UBS and the person responsible for bringing economist Hyman Minsky to the public’s attention, invokes him again in a good piece in the Financial Times. In keeping with his affinity for the world view of the dour economist, Magnus depicts our current credit crunch as a Minsky moment and […]

Read more...

Martin Wolf Defends the Fed

Normally, I have the highest regard for Martin Wolf, the Financial Times’ lead economics writer. He is forthright, data-driven, articulate, sober, and insightful. However, I take issue with his current article, “The Federal Reserve must prolong the party,” and see its failings as symptomatic of the state of economics. In brief, Wolf argues that the […]

Read more...

Minsky Moment Deferred?

John Authers of the Financial Times thinks the markets got a lucky break this week, and deferred a so-called Minsky moment, which he discussed in a noteworthy piece earlier. By way of background, economist Hyman Minsky observed that creditors become more lax about lending standards during times of stability. He divided borrowers into three types: […]

Read more...

"Peculiar Libertarian Beliefs"

A little weekend levity, courtesy Economic Investigations: That recessions are always and everywhere caused by the government. (That’s because they mostly know only one theoretical account/scenario for such an event.) That the seigniorage caused by a 3% annual rate of inflation plays a big role in politics and that it’s big enough to motivate a […]

Read more...

"Perils of Inflation Targeting"

We’ve been skeptical of inflation targeting, no doubt as a result of seeing Paul Volcker use monetary targets very effectively. Witness the proof of the pudding, namely, asset bubbles, deteriorating credit quality, and increasing inflation (at least in overall CPI, although core CPI is better behaved). But serious economists have only started looking into this […]

Read more...

Market and Government Co-Dependence

The notion that markets need rules, and therefore rulemakers, which generally implies some form of government oversight, is anathema to libertarians. But as we have stressed before, the markets that the public at large thinks of as well-functioning, like the US stock markets, are in fact highly regulated and would not exist without it. So […]

Read more...

Debunking the Notion That Unions Hurt Productivity

A neat little analysis by Ross Eisenbrey at the Economic Policy Institute may be difficult for union foes to explain away. It shows the proportion of workers covered by collective bargaining agreements in major European countries and the US and then shows productivity growth country by country in the same group 1979-2005. Despite being the […]

Read more...

"Is international labor mobility necessarily good?"

Faithful readers, I hope you’ll forgive the comparatively skimpy posts this early morning. I had to spend some time with a buddy who had just learned that one of his closest friends is dying. Generally, I give trade economics a wide berth, because once you get past simple two-country, two factor models the discussion gets […]

Read more...

On Orthodox Economics and Why a Broken Paradigm Prevails

We have only occasionally commented on the lively debate on the serious economics blogs on heterodoxy in economics (basically, the loyal opposition is a beleaguered minority). However, Mark Thoma on his blog, Economist’s View, picks up and elaborates on an insight by Steve Waldman that has much larger implications. Waldman argues that neoclassical economics has […]

Read more...