Sunday’s Washington Post has a long article on Japan, “For Japan, a Long, Slow Slide,” that is truly odd. Mind you, on the surface, there is nothing wrong with it. It makes the usual observations: Japan’s population is aging, productivity is falling, the country is losing its economic standing. It give the impression that Japan is sliding into a genteel, self-imposed poverty due to insularity, lack of drive and innovation, and a resignation to its fallen standing.
What is striking is what the article fails to say. Despite the continuing squeeze on Japanese workers (income fell last year by 1.9% despite positive inflation), Japan is an export powerhouse and has the largest foreign exchange reserves in the world. While all is admittedly not well in Japan, one can make the case that worker incomes have been reduced to preserve national competitiveness. The image that Japan is a basket case is useful, since otherwise, its trading partners would insist on a stronger yen.
And the most notable lapse is the failure to mention the role of the collapse of the joint stock market and real estate bubbles in the early 1990s that led to financial crisis, socialization of losses, deflation, and low to no growth. While some have speculated that we may be going down the Japan path, that idea is absent from this article. Indeed, whether intentionally or not, it stresses the conditions in Japan not found in the US: low birthrate and tough immigration restrictions; sapping of competitive spirit; limited income disparity. Yet those very features, which are described as negative, also supported social cohesion, which may well have prevented chaos during the worst years of its banking crisis. How well would America muddle through if its financial system falls off a cliff?
From the Washington Post:
As the United States frets noisily about a recession, Japan is quietly enduring a far more fundamental economic slide, one that seems irreversible.
This country, which got rich quick in a postwar miracle of manufacturing and alarmed Americans by buying up baubles such as Rockefeller Center, is steadily slipping backward as a major economic force.
Fifteen years ago, Japan ranked fourth among the world’s countries in gross domestic product per capita. It now ranks 20th. In 1994, its share of the world’s economy peaked at 18 percent; in 2006, the number was below 10 percent.
The government acknowledged last month what has long been obvious to economists and foreign investors, if not to the Japanese public and many politicians. The minister of economic and fiscal policy, Hiroko Ota, told parliament that Japan could no longer be described as a “first-class” economy.
“I have a sense of crisis because Japan has not nurtured industries that will grow in the future,” said Ota, who offered no specific remedies for the crisis.
Japan is still the world’s second-largest economy, as measured by gross size, although the island nation has been surpassed by China in purchasing power. In coming decades, the economies of China and India will dwarf Japan’s, according to many projections. By 2050, Japan’s economy will be about the size of Indonesia’s or Brazil’s, according to a study by PricewaterhouseCoopers.
Japan’s slide relative to other major economies is not a tabloid tale of suddenly squandered riches. It is rather an insidious petering out of growth, productivity and innovation — and of political will to stop the slippage.
The slide has dovetailed with another quietly insidious crisis — the petering out of the population. Japan has the world’s highest proportion of elderly people and the lowest proportion of children.
By 2050, population decline will have reduced economic growth to zero, according to the Japan Center for Economic Research. Seventy percent of the country’s labor force will have disappeared.
The undertow is already being felt here. Supermarket and department store sales have declined for 11 consecutive years. Toyota now is arguably the world’s largest carmaker, but sales of new cars of all brands in Japan peaked 18 years ago and have been falling steadily since then.
Still, with the exception of increasing poverty among the elderly in shrinking rural towns, this remains a remarkably comfortable middle-class country, with good health care and infrastructure and a low crime rate.
Unemployment is at a 10-year low of 3.9 percent, although wages are stagnant or declining. Thanks to six consecutive years of (relatively slow) growth, the panic and deflation that accompanied the bursting of Japan’s real estate bubble in the 1990s are gone.
“People here are rich, happy, safe and clean,” said Oki Matsumoto, chief executive of Monex Inc., an Internet investment company. They also have more savings in the bank than residents of any other major wealthy country.
And that is precisely the problem, according to Matsumoto and many others who worry about Japan’s future.
“Although the situation is not good, because it is not so bad, people from top to bottom remain indifferent,” said Minoru Morita, a political analyst in Tokyo. “The leaders in this country don’t expect too much and they are very good at adapting to a new environment, even if that means a downward spiral.”
Economists here say that although Japan’s economy is growing, it is not growing nearly fast enough to keep pace with other countries, especially booming China and much of the rest of Asia.
Japan, in many ways, continues to keep out foreign capital and foreign management. It ranks last in foreign direct investment among the 30 members of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, and second to last in venture capital investment…
In the classes he teaches at Tokyo’s Keio University, Shumpei Takemori compares Japan’s passive acceptance of economic slippage to that of a frog swimming in a dish of slowly warming water. “Our problem is that the frog is already boiled,” said Takemori, a professor of economics. “It doesn’t have enough energy to jump.”
A jump toward restructuring did occur here after the bursting of the bubble in the 1990s.
Junichiro Koizumi, prime minister from 2001 to 2006, moved more aggressively than any postwar Japanese leader to overhaul the banking system, deregulate big business and open up the economy. His government convinced many investors that “Japan is back,” and the stock market rebounded.
But under his successors — Shinzo Abe and now Yasuo Fukuda — the momentum for change has stalled. In recent months, there has been re-regulation.
New building codes hobbled the home-building industry, sending housing starts last fall to a 40-year low. New lending regulations created a credit squeeze for small businesses. For the first time since 1990, Japanese companies are increasingly buying each other’s shares to stave off acquisition by foreign companies, according to research done by Nomura Securities.
Japan’s foreign minister, Masahiko Komura, said last month that the government might consider requiring long-term foreign residents to prove proficiency in speaking Japanese, a suggestion that spooked foreign businessmen here.
Regardless of government policy, some downward drift of Japan from its lofty economic perch is natural and inevitable, according to economists and business leaders.
Japan’s spectacular flush of manufacturing wealth after World War II was, in many ways, “lucky,” said Matsumoto, the investment company executive, who is a student of Japanese economic history.
“The government took a huge bet on a few strategic industries — like steel and automobiles — and it worked,” he said. “It took our economy up to second place in the world. It is totally abnormal for a country with 127 million people.”
Citing the rise of China and India, Matsumoto says global capitalism is shifting patterns of wealth creation in a way that more closely links a country’s gross domestic product with the size of its population.
What concerns political and economic analysts is that many Japanese politicians — and the voters they represent — do not understand how wealth is being created in the 21st century.
“The current leadership of Japan came of age during the incredible success after World War II,” said Matsumoto. “They think that what worked then will work forever.”
“Citing the rise of China and India, Matsumoto says global capitalism is shifting patterns of wealth creation in a way that more closely links a country’s gross domestic product with the size of its population.”
What we have is “global corporatism.” not capitalism. ‘Free Trade’ is articulated in lengthy agreements, Free Trade is highly regulated trade. There is nothing free about it.
The quoted journalist seems to think Toyota consumption within Japan is indicative of the Japanese economy’s health, after preambling that Toyota is arguably the largest car manufacturer in the world. What does domestic CONSUMPTION have to do with wealth and health?
Production and productive capacity are better indicators of wealth, as are low crime rates, universal education, etc. etc.
Thanks, Yves, for always finding provocative articles… and providing interesting commentary.
On a good day, your blog is my first read.
Although huge amount of losses were socialized, those losses are still on their balance sheet. Tax payers in Japan have to pay off those losses while their economy is shrinking, unless they accept tons of immigrants. Otherwise, we’ll see Nikkei 225 sinks to less than 5000yen level within five years.
How well would America muddle through if its financial system falls off a cliff?
I`m so glad I read that today and not last year.. that sas SO classic!!