By Lambert Strether of Corrente.
Readers, this is a travel day for me, and I got nuthin’, though I’m trying to plough through the Mueller report (“One should always have something sensational to read in the train.” –Oscar Wilde, The Importance of Being Earnest). Talk amongst yourselves!
Readers, feel free to contact me at lambert [UNDERSCORE] strether [DOT] corrente [AT] yahoo [DOT] com, with (a) links, and even better (b) sources I should curate regularly, (c) how to send me a check if you are allergic to PayPal, and (d) to find out how to send me images of plants. Vegetables are fine! Fungi are deemed to be honorary plants! If you want your handle to appear as a credit, please place it at the start of your mail in parentheses: (thus). Otherwise, I will anonymize by using your initials. See the previous Water Cooler (with plant) here. Today’s plant (Carla):
Carla writes: “Year after year, the most spectacular Rhody in the neighborhood.”
Readers: Water Cooler is a standalone entity not covered by the annual NC fundraiser. So do feel free to make a contribution today or any day. Here is why: Regular positive feedback both makes me feel good and lets me know I’m on the right track with coverage. When I get no donations for five or ten days I get worried. More tangibly, a constant trickle of small donations helps me with expenses, and I factor in that trickle when setting fundraising goals. So if you see something you especially appreciate, do feel free to click this donate button:
Here is the screen that will appear, which I have helpfully annotated.
If you hate PayPal, you can email me at lambert [UNDERSCORE] strether [DOT] corrente [AT] yahoo [DOT] com, and I will give you directions on how to send a check. Thank you!
That truly is a spectacular rhododendron!
Oh my! Carla, are you submitting fake (doctored) plantidotes? /s
They get that big – some of their ancestors are trees, from the Himalayas. Portland OR is a good place to see really big ones. Even the NW native gets really big, but usually rangy because it’s in the woods.
Edit: taking you too seriously, aren’t I?
Not a bit of it!
In fact, today I found an even bigger one in the ‘hood and said “Damn! How did I miss that?”
Some of the rhodies I see around here that are in full bloom hurt the eye so much that I gotta wear shades ! Of course, I do that when I step out the front door when visually assaulted by both the Lemon balm on the one hand, and the Lithiodora on the other, dualing it out to where all I can see are after-images. Then the Ca.Poppies hit like a laser, causing polecat to grope for purchase like a blind man !
Saw one exactly like the photo, in front of a house in coastal British Columbia. In fact if I think I have a picture here somewhere.
Biggest one I ever saw was on a sheep farm in New Zealand. Must have approached 30′ tall.
Private Eye’s Theresa May Memorial Issue. Harsh but fair:
haha I’m clicking on your link then the page then refreshing and thinking “wtf it just keeps coming up blank”… and then I suddenly got it!
(“One should always have something sensational to read in the train.” –Oscar Wilde, The Importance of Being Earnest).
As much as i’ve always relished the idea of never going into a coffee shop sans newspaper-where the sensational stuff was often on the 9th page, now that my eyesight isn’t what it once was, I find myself squinting and being too proud still to wear a cheap pair of reading glasses (it’s similar to buying a minivan-you’re done) it only works if I have good available light, otherwise I might as well be Mr. Magoo.
No it’s not. It’s not at all. As proof, I point to the fact that I have five sets of cheap reading glasses (because I can’t find one otherwise) and a super-duty Ford type set for special work.
I can’t afford 5 minivans and an F350, so there.
I interpreted what Wukchumni said differently.
I saw it as saying that if you now need reading glasses and drive a minivan, you’re ‘over the hill’. Hence, ‘done for’!
Wukchumni, care to elaborate?
Yes, i’m over the hill, but in a deep state of denial.
My eyes were quite an asset once upon a time, and i’d see older numismatists back in the day whose orbits were failing them, and they couldn’t grade accurately(differentiate between 1-70 possible conditions of any given coin) anymore (one of the main keys to success) and some would wear this ‘jewelers headband magnifier’ thing where they kind of looked like Geordi La Forge, and not in a complimentary fashion. They looked ridiculous.
Funny thing is, I could care less about coins, and much prefer to be in an Ansel Adams scene, aka the big picture. My eyesight is crystal clear outdoors.
It seems to me that one feels one’s age, when one sees the current pictures of the stars of one’s childhood.
My Dad started off his working life as a draftsman, back in the days of slide rules and pencils. (He always finish sharpened his pencils on a piece of fine sandpaper.) He said that, “Once your eyes start going, look for another line of work.” (He was even more prone to puns than myself.)
Your implied dig at the “fantastic” aspects of numismatics did not go unnoticed.
I’m to the point where, whilst throwing clay on the wheel, that I have to don glasses as I do the finishing touches on a lip, shoulder, or foot .. least it become an unintended funkart clay piece.
Yeah. As a friend of Phyl’s who was also an artist put it; “At the end of the day, it all becomes “End of the Day” artwork.”
I’m eligible for barely there senior-discounts, but find menus to be age discriminatory towards later era quinquagenarians in general, and once when I tried to order a senior selection when I was 54 and half at an eatery, I got carded and the waitress who couldn’t have been older than the internet, chastised me and told me to come back when I was of legal age.
Because I have repeatedly lost, sat on, stepped on, you-name-it, etc. my reading glasses, I finally decided on an expensive but final solution. I had a pair of no-line bifocals made, with clear glass in the upper portions and my reading strength in the lower area. If I say so myself, they look cool and my reading glasses are always ready for use.
The dollar store usually has them – because, as you say, you can’t have too many.
I also occasionally buy them at the thrift store, so now they’re marked with bits of tape for extra strength (good for really close work) and too weak – which suit my wife.
Who says cheap Chinese junk isn’t worth the expense. I, like a phool, purchased a set of spendier Cosco readers .. thinking they were of good quality .. WRONG! I scratched the bloody hell out of 2 of the 4 pairs of lenses in less that 2 weeks, lost a screw on another set, and sat on the remaining one, rendering it unusable. Sooo, as per you, Oregoncharles, I’m back to the Quatloo Store for moar cheapies.
I’m resisting the siren call to acquire perscription lenses.
Bright light allows the pupil to narrow, improving depth of field. Perhaps in lieu of reading glasses, these could provide portable bright light (it comes with a harness for one’s head):
I use these on my bike (red filter for the rear) and they are painfully bright.
I gave my mom a cheapo magnifying glass with LED lights for Christmas a while back. Ended up being the thing she kept thanking me for.
This sounds interesting! Will look for one,
Big Lots, not an endorsement, but that’s where I got that one. The LED light aisle.
Last month I had cataract surgery in both eyes. And in a month have gone from extreme near sightedness to complete near sightedness.
The change was overnight and totally confusing. I went weeks without being able to read at all until about noon. I finally last week figured out the reading strength I need (+2.00) and can read NC even in the early morning again.
But I still haven’t found a glasses style I like. And I don’t think I look right in glasses. I’m thinking about getting progressive lenses with nothing on top or mid range….. But maybe getting used to my own face wouldn’t be such a bad idea.
Oh, and no complaints about the new lenses, they are a miracle. Even fixed the astigmatism! I am just getting used to a dramatically different way to function.
I’d like to draw attention to the calendar for the 2020 primaries. It looks very different than 2016. The graphic in the 2nd link shows it. It really hits hard in early-mid March and is mostly done by then. Looks like at least 2/3 of the country will have voted by 3/17.
Something to keep in mind when you’re reminding yourself, “it’s early”. That should now get revised to, “It’s early, but things are going to come fast and furious and be mostly done by April 2020.”
The cowardice of a political system’s 2 parties to have rolling primaries over several months rather than a one-day nationwide primary cannot be understated. Then again, I’m one of the wishful ones asking for a popular vote so my electoral impact isn’t a tiny fraction of someone from Wyoming.
As with healthcare, war and peace, and human dignity in general, our betters have other ideas than what the will of the people clearly desires.
Yes, but the point of “it’s early” is to remind everyone to calm down. Most people who may vote D aren’t paying close attention yet. Not much has really happened yet. The first debate will be a very big deal, at least until the second debate, etc. Sometime in October and November more people will start paying attention. And then it will accelerate, as the headlines turn from debates, gaffes, oppo and fundraising to actual results. For the next three months, most people are thinking about the ordinary business of their lives far more than seriously considering who to vote for more than 6 months in the future. So much of the commentary these days are just efforts to seize control by constructing a narrative, and I think the huge field may actually be providing an inherent push back, space that currently prevents a media narrative from congealing and trying to drive the voting. Now, individual candidates face concerted media narratives for or against, sure, but none will be able to dominate the race for some time to come
just my 2c.
I think the first “debate” will be nothing but a joke. Twenty-three candidates? Even if only a third of them “qualify”, it will still be enough to make a mockery of the process and of any statements that come from it. I have no intention of watching it. The only action going on right now is the chase for money, campaign staff, and organizing.
Until the Setzer Poll starts coming out a couple months before the Iowa Caucuses, there’s nothing happening in the actual race. Those Monmouth and Emerson polls and Nate Silver’s prognostications based on them, are worthless.
I loved the link this morning of Nate Silver gaming out the debates. Did not read it, but wow they prefer a horse race. I mean, will there be grain shortages later this year? Would a Green New Deal cut into Corporate Subsidies? Who cares!
Will there be a Bonus March that knocks everything into a cocked hat*?
*Wow again, Der Google is really giving me a Flowers for Algernon vibe this week. Has anyone done work on how much they punish using the privacy protection options? Should I set up a larry.tweezerhead account to bookmark the last Web Libraries now?
Your comment (and a little spare time) prompted me to do the math. By March 17th fully 68% of all pledged delegates will have been chosen. Perhaps as bad or worse than the earliness is the compression in the calendar. Nearly 64% of all pledged delegates will be chosen in the two week period between March 3rd and March 17th. [I used Wikipedia for the source of the primary dates and BallotPedia for the source of the pledged delegate counts for each state.]
Is that like having to decide on one’s college major by the third grade?
More like the third trimester.
Harder to run a brokered convention that way. Not that I’d be surprised that the Qualified but Stupid did not game that out.
I’ve always been baffled by the Media Consent that the Primary Season for Democrats must be sealed up as soon as possible or ZOMGBBQ. Even for 2004, when Garrison Keillor was still singing the “We’re all Republicans Now” song; it was their only chance to intervene in the narrative, and they wanted it over as soon as possible. Ford vs Reagan worked out great for the Republicans in the long run.
One comment about the coming election.
When do we prefer a candidate whose program rates, say, only a 60 (on a scale of 1 to 100), over another candidate whose program rates an 80?
Is it electability (in the general election)?
I think it’s more than that.
The equation I have in mind, for picking the candidate, is
(program grade) x (party nomination probability) x electability (probability of winning in the general election) x (probability of getting said program passed through Congress).
So, for example, for Biden, the numbers could be
60 x 70% nomination wiith help x 50% beating Trump x 60% passing Congress = 12.6
And for Sanders, the numbers might be:
80 x 50% nomination x 60% beating Trump x 30% passing Congress = 7.2
In this hypothetical example, you go with Biden, even if his program rates only a 60, on your scale.
Of course, the diffifult part is assigning a number to each of those probabilities, but it shows the candidate’s program is not the only factor. And it’s not just about electability either.
What part of the equation takes into account the qualitative differences in policy (which will vary by the person)? With Biden, for example, lots of things might pass that would be horrible. So, is voting for him to pass things in the short term something that should increase his support? Look at all the things he worked with his friends on the right to pass in decades past. Or, what about a factor that takes into account what can be accomplished in the short term versus the medium or long term, or what shape the country, working people and the Democratic Party will be in if someone like Biden was elected and he didn’t solve any of our problems? Will the context that produced Trump go anywhere? How about a factor for Biden doing next to nothing on the environmental crisis?
As to the program part for Biden, he would get a zero from me economically. And putting a zero anywhere in the equation will of course make the result…err zero. ;-)
Let’s simply it.
Unless the Democrats nominate Bernie, Trump wins again.
Most likely you’re right. Biden just may have a chance at a win but I think the end result of that would be a one-term presidency for him after which he loses to a “smart” version of Trump because the establishment status quo will have had four more years to increase the overall level of misery. By that, I mean a Republican candidate who has much of Trump’s “strengths” (ability to grab headlines, make a substantial number of voters believe he is on their side, the instinctive ability to sense and exploit weaknesses, a genius level proficiency at BS etc.) but combined with the sort of ruthless competence and knowledge of how politics works behind the scenes that history’s most powerful and frightening authoritarians have had.
A 2 year yawn of grinding status quo then a GOP sweep in the 2022 mid terms followed by a Tom Cotton presidency in 2024. The Biden legacy.
I think, you are pretty much right. Biden has horrible baggage and isn’t essentially likable at this point. I don’t care what kind of straight-talking, man of the people mythos obtains in the beltway. His crew is limiting his exposure for a reason. Does this f*&%ing remind us of anyone? Anyone?
as for the rest
except for tulsi (the constant refrain)
they are either corporate media creations or slaves to donors
(or essentially gutless-warren)
and thus would allow trump to run populist again
the only way he can win
bernie, as k. kulinski sometimes says, is trump’s kryptonite
Bernie with Tulsi as Vice President = 12 or 16 years of progressive politics in the white house.
Biden with ?? as Vice President = Lots of Democrats stay home election day,
4 more years of Trump.
Irish article but references UC Berkeley research
Opinion: Why do rich people lie, cheat and steal more than those on low incomes?
Seven experiments produced similar results leading researchers to conclude that higher social class predicts unethical behaviour, writes Diarmuid Pepper.
People get rich by lying, cheating, and stealing.
It WORKS for them.
The debunking causality argument isn’t that clear. Most wealth is inherited so I’d add that the kids are also taught to lie, cheat, and steal.
There’s a lot of fallout too. But that’s how the finally rich get there. For people whose capital is measured in money.
I wonder how much fear of a ticket they couldn’t afford contributed to every “beater” car stopping at the pedestrian crosswalk? Makes the Swedish way of ticketing people based on their income seem an even better idea.
I’ve been passing the wind map of the U.S. previously linked by Lambert around the office and today a co-worker returned the favor by sending me to this online wind & temperature globe.
Its been an unproductive but very educational morning!
Wind? Temp? So limited….this site has way more!
Didn’t know about this site. Wonderful!
I am a weather geek who loves Ventusky.
Thanks!…to you and Steph.
my youngest wants to be a meteorologist. these kinds of visualisations serve to extend/heighten his interest.
The whole edifice must be a Russian ‘front’ site.
Thanks! I’m always on the lookout for new ways to be edifyingly unproductive.
Also see Ventusky https://www.ventusky.com/?p=42.2;-115.3;4&l=snow&t=20170304/00
For those who like their politics served with a side of hip-hop.
Killer Mike interviewed by Charlamagne for Hollywood Reporter.
Considering this morning’s discussion of the use and misuse of ‘freedom’. I’ve been thinking there should be an appropriate rewrite for Kristofferson.
“Freedom’s just another word for ________________________”
I just haven’t come up with anything I like. Anybody else want to try?
Come now, comrade! half measures are the bourgeois kissing cousins of Menshevism.
Freedom is merely privilege extended, unless enjoyed by one and all
“Freedom ” is just another word for ” Made in Merica”
Freedom’s just another word for surveillance.
sucker. It’s not the freedom to choose… it’s the freedom to be scammed.
I don’t think that song, or that line, can be improved on.
So how close are we?
I’m with you on this.
Easy. The way it’s being used by blowhards now, “freedom” is just another word for “selfishness.”
They mean “freedom” as in “I’m free to do whatever the family blog I feel like family blogging doing, regardless of who or what gets hurt.”
Not only that, but if you take anyone or anything else into consideration, you’re an “enemy of freedom.”
Of course it makes perfect sense in Blowhardian English.
I should add another question: has there ever been another word that more clearly and immediately identifies a blowhard — or, rather, scumbag seems even more appropriate — from a large distance?
Of course we had to go and elect one of whatever type this is as the president of the most powerful nation on this planet. Sigh.
the term “Ur-Moron” bubbled up from my drug addled brain this morning.
I think it fit the cultivar.
Freedom’s just another word for “you’re gonna get screwed”.
I like this one best. Even though it has 7 syllables, it fits the melody, in a Dylan sort of way. To actually use 5 syllables and rhyme with the original:
Those in charge will choose
“Freedom’s just another word for ‘I haven’t thought this through’
Haven’t, haven’t, but Sammy was pleased, yeah
But, feelin’ good was easy, Lord, when he sang the blues
Hey, feelin’ good was good enough for me, mm-hmm
Good enough for me and my USG”
because apparently they have the freedom to appear on every screen no matter how much I scroll
We’ve got a really good Superintendent @ Sequoia NP, and Woody Smeck has been the majordomo of the big trees park since 2013, and we’re lucky to have him. He’s soft spoken and down to earth, and NPS uses him to fill in temporary gaps @ top management @ Yosemite NP & Grand Canyon NP, as shenanigans have ousted Superintendents there.
A nice interview with him:
Rick McIntyre in Yellowstone, another good guy in the same vein.
Rest in peace, Leon Redbone. Here’s a good obituary in Rolling Stone and a fitting tune from his last studio album, Flying By: Save Your Sorrow
I always thought he was way under-rated as a guitarist.
he’s like crackers and milk at night…inherited from my dad…passed on to my kids.
Leon Redbone sounds a bit like Hoagy Carmichael in Howard Hawks’ “To Have and Have Not” (1944). His ragtime sound was buttery soft and soothing to the ears much like Hoagy Carmichael’s. Here’s film clip of him and his band performing “Hong Kong Blues”:
You can also hear him perform “Am I Blue” with Lauren Bacall, who was only 19 years old at the time:
Mueller has been particularly silent on something, what’s e’ trying to hide with the old silent vowel trick that never fooled anybody?
A new Jonathan Pie for your Brexit fix.
Most people voted “None of the Above” is a really good reminder of where we are. At least where we get to vote for our oligarchs.
MMT textbook has sold out, being reprinted:
Echidne Reads the Mueller Report. Volume One.
Echidne Reads the Mueller Report. Volume Two.
Echindne reads the Mueller Report. Mueller said the GRU hacked the DNC, etc. Echindne believes Mueller and restates as fact what is yet to be proven, etc.
I also read the Mueller Report (well, part one anyway). It is, indeed, impressive “how very clearly it states that the Russian government was behind the different forms of cyber warfare aimed at Hillary Clinton’s candidacy and, more importantly, at directly affecting the 2016 US elections…” More impressive are these bold assertions when we have *still* not been provided any evidence. The IRA stuff is ridiculous. The GRU hacking assertions have been challenged explicitly by Binney and the VIPS, as well as others. These challenges have been *ignored* by Mueller, the media, and all Russiagaters, as have key witnesses and alternative lines of inquiry. There is considerable evidence that the intelligence community was engaged in an extensive operation to entrap Trump and/or members of his campaign, most of which was understated or omitted completely in the Mueller Report.
Given all this, why should we believe these statements by Mueller? If you believe them, I respect that, but I would like to know why. There are many reasons *not* to believe Mueller. Here are a few:
I fully understand that one person’s “facts” are another person’s fancy, especially these days. But I am asking an absolutely sincere question. Why should I believe Mueller’s statements about Russian hacking and other “meddling”? I have a lot of reasons not to.
For a nation that loves CSI-wherever, there’s not much appreciation for forensics. I’m in the evidence should first be tested for it’s realness club.
I had visitors from the big city up for a few days and I was roundly excoriated in the vein of these posts, as well as being told in no uncertain terms that if you didn’t vote for hillary you are a bigot and a racist, and centrist republicans should abandon the party in droves to join the dems without the slightest bit of irony or self reflection. And no I’m not kidding, I was told I’d better “get in line”…I suggested maybe learning a different turn of phrase. Nothing else matters. or will get any air. Then jill biden on trevor noah…add in the compressed primary schedule and I found that all my fragile hopes are lost. If we get a centrist depublican, which currently looks more likely, it will be a phyrric victory, but hey, like jonathan pie says, sometimes you gotta hit rock bottom. Maybe lamberts take on it will improve my outlook…
Let guess and venture to say that these visitors are not .. uh .. friends, but now fiends instead ..
They would be in my little black book.
no, they’re friends…
I went to the powell memo as proof that there was actually a plan, such as it was, and got a kick out of the use of “enterprise” as opposed to the currently popular “free enterprise”…I’d like to think I made a little headway…
I want my MMT
Now look at them yo-yo’s, that’s the way you do it
You play war in the ‘stanbox on the MMT
That ain’t workin’, that’s the way you do it
Money for nothin’ and your f.o.b.’s for free
Now that ain’t workin’, that’s the way you do it
Lemme tell ya, them guys ain’t dumb
Maybe get a blister on your little finger
Maybe get a blister on your thumb
We gotta mouse clique coven
Custom money deliveries
We gotta move these units
We gotta move that democracy
We shoulda learned to fix our infrastructure
We shoulda yearned to fix our slums
Look at that selfie-stick, we’ve got an i.e.d. blast in the camera
Oh, man we could have some video hits numbers fun
Get your money for nothin’, get your clicks for free (Ow, yeah)
Get your money for nothin’ and your clicks for free (What’s that?)
Get your money for nothin’ and your clicks for free (Look at that, look at that)
Get your money for nothin’ and your clicks for free (I want my, I want my, I want my MMT)
I listened to this album over and over while driving from the Columbia gorge back to the SF bay area where my wife had been suddenly taken very ill. This was the song that most got to me then.
She fully recovered.
The lyrics on this one also from 1986 proved timely…
I’d just like to go to work, but they shut it down
I’ve got a right to go to work but there’s now work here to be found
And they say we’re going to have to pay, we’re told
We’re going to have to reap from seed that’s been sowed
Thanks for sending me down this Dire Straits rabbit hole. Amazing stuff.
Best song on the album IMHO.
Italy is evicting Steve Bannon from the medieval monastery he planned to turn into a far-right training academy
Good for Italy at lest they remember their history. Amerika not so much.
Blasted through more Freedom Molecules than you could shake a 6 speed manual transmission stick at, the other day.
I reckon when I burn firewood here, it takes the stored energy from the Sun & 30 years of growth, about 30 minutes before running out of btu’s, done.
The EROTI on 87 octane is a bigger time scale @ 100 million years old.
Ode to F.M.
You noticed its not freedom gallons?
Peak oil theory was a price manipulation from 74, but after commodities market pump-and-dumps in the 80’s we’ve had relatively effective regulations. That’s because it’s ownedd by the regulators, and vice versa.
Monopoly creates rises in rent extraction, but stable commodities. Copper gets 2 dollars a pound at the scrap yard, and we’re told gasoline is stable to silver prices.
But I guess that’s a model that assumes rational actors are still making the decisions.
The following is an amazingly interesting link at the nexus between political campaigns and information security.
What I Learned Trying To Secure Congressional Campaigns
Here’s a teaser, under the heading “Things that went badly” …
(A good icebreaker with these people is talking about how much you both hate VAN.)
Hee Haw Hee Haw!
One Day in Gaza is now on archiv.org.
PBS cancelled broadcasting it last week because the potato is too hot to hold.
pbs might have received a call from sandy alderson if they show it then the checks would stop coming.
Thanks for the link
And now as a public service announcement – “How to avoid accidentally becoming a Russian agent”. I had assumed that this would have been a tongue in cheek article but it seems to be serious. No wonder that the Onion has a hard time keeping up-
gag me with a spoon.
so: “the internet is too dangerous, citizen…don’t use it. instead, use one of these approved information outlets…”
i’ve got a box of booklets and magazines from the 50’s that contain the same sort of breathless paranoia…the only thing missing in this new iteration is the word “communism”.
But wait – it gets better. Much better! There is a new Call of Duty coming out which features innocent children in Syria, murderous Russian soldiers, gas attacks, heroic White Helmets and more. There is an article about this at-
Another article at Sputnik has a clip from this new game-
This all-encompassing s**t is getting very depressing.
Is that Public Radio International? They used to tell me about Chomsky and Honduras. And used a deliberately French-syntax name. Oy.
That rhody is magnificent!
Also coolest website I recently found is: https://fallingfruit.org/
Tells you where all the edible fruit and nut trees are in your neighborhood….
In our “civilized” society, foraging and learning the skills of past generations has unfortunately been lost. I’m hoping that more folks get interested in this.
Remember this about the Mexican border issue and why Trump besides 20 years of Republican whining over it: Land owners on the border are big Republicans. There you have it. With the surge from Mexico that started in the early 70’s and cresting at elevated levels in 2007, Republicans must deal with it while Democrats generally due to tribal politics, have washed their hands of it. Trafficking them over? Go right ahead. Trump much like GWB has gutted custom enforcement on trafficking to such a degree, getting over via trafficking while expensive, has plenty of funding from Evangelical Christians and Republican capitalists has increased numbers. The Russian Mafia which has long ties to the Trump Organization runs the sex trade from Asia and has little problem joining in on that little money making scheme.
Under Obama, border customs agents inspecting goods flowing into the US was more prevalent…..in the west coast, much more prevalent. Trump has basically turned it all on the southern border due to property owner concerns and indeed, trafficking which had stopped growing under Obama era rules, have accelerated again. Wall Street’s connection and the big bank connection with these property owners cannot be understated either. It all fits like a glove, especially how over the last 100 years they got deeds to the land. Most are ‘royality” of the elite now.
At some point, some Democrat is gonna call the Republicans out on this. They are scared for be labeled a “racist”, but those fears last so long. Trump is making a fool out of the customs process. He should and imo Republicans will be called out on it in the next decade.
Perhaps this election calls for a new strategy by the “left”. Direct attack on Trump’s inability to pick a viable cabinet and his willingness to accept a revolving door of subpar appointees. So he is psycho puppetmaster.
What if…Bernie picks a VP (Tulsi G), Treasury Sec (Eliz W), Sec of Defense (?), Attorney General (?) etc and attempts to build a governing “platform” to be elected en masse.
Give the people a clear idea of WHO will be the next admin while thinning the field, stealing the spotlight, baiting Trump and the DNC.
At this point the D’s are putting a “lesser Bob Dole” out there with the inability to gain a majority of electoral college votes but lots of negatives to be exploited. Committee to Re elect the President wins hands down. UGH!!!!!
Single candidates with a pitbull VP are so 2000’s.
Joe Bob says “Check it out!”
I apparently missed Jonathan Chait’s criticism of Bernie for his support of the Sandinistas in the 1980s and, more recently, his “rude” response to Sydney Ember of the NYT. Ryan Cooper’s response to Chait nails it, with just the right level of sarcasm for these self-righteous liberal hacks:
WOW that rhody! I’ve never seen one even half that glorious. Around here they are decidedly spindly understory bushes.
Well this is going to be fun. And Meuller knew all about it-
“Did Brits warn about Steele’s credibility, before Mueller’s probe? Congress has evidence”
investment in vpn worth it, bypass foxtel and straight to bt sport on youtube. Scouser hoping for Liverpool win….
Dour game. They all looked like they’d been on the piss for a few weeks.
Tottenham with Harry Kane. It was like watching England at the next WC, only early