Yves here. When Alternet and a sane conservative like Jonathan Turley agree on something, you know it’s a real issue. Chuck Schumer grandstanding about Roe v. Wade on the Supreme Court steps wasn’t just a stunt:
Schumer’s threat to the Court that “you will pay the price” is a direct attack on the integrity of our courts. I criticized Trump for his reckless comments about the courts. Where is the chorus of condemnation of Schumer? Schumer sounded more like a stalker than a statesman.
— Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) March 4, 2020
Some key issues about abortion keep being ignored. In every other advanced economy that has legalized abortions, the right is enshrined in legislation, not subject to the vagaries of legal interpretation. The price of doing it that way means making some compromises to with the right to life types, and they’ve typically meant limiting abortions in all but cases where the mother’s life is threatened to the first trimester. Feminists could have gotten this done during Peak Womens Lib, in the early-mid 1970s, but put all their political chips on trying to get an Equal Rights Amendment. And back then, evangelicals weren’t much of a political force.
In addition, it rarely goes mentioned that in the heartlands, the right to abortion is close to non-existent for the lower middle class and poor due to cost, scarcity of clinics, and the inability to take time off from work.
By Cody Fenwick. Originally published at Alternet
Chief Justice John Roberts issued a rare statement on Wednesday denouncing “dangerous” remarks made earlier in the day by Democratic Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York.
Schumer held a rally outside the Supreme Court on the day it held oral arguments in a case that could prove pivotal in the fight of abortion rights in the United States. At one point, he called out the two justices who were appointed by President Donald Trump and issued a threat.
“They’re taking away fundamental rights,” Schumer said. “I want to tell you, [Justice Neil] Gorsuch! I want to tell you, [Justice Brett] Kavanaugh! You have released the whirlwind, and you will pay the price! You won’t know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions!”
Watch the clip below:
WATCH: Democrat Senator Chuck Schumer threatens U.S. Supreme Court Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh.
"You have released the whirlwind and you will pay the price! You won't know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions!"pic.twitter.com/e1qKzocJDj
— Steve Guest (@SteveGuest) March 4, 2020
In response, Roberts denounced the minority leader’s attacks in an evening statement:
This morning, Senator Schumer spoke at a rally in front of the Supreme Court while a case was being argued inside. Senator Schurner referred to two Members of the Court by name and said he wanted to tell them that “You have released the whirlwind, and you will pay the price. You will not know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions.” Justices know that criticism comes with the territory, but threatening statements of this sort from the highest levels of government arc not only inappropriate, they are dangerous. All Members of the Court will continue to do their job, without fear or favor, from whatever quarter.
Such direct responses to a politician’s comments from the chief justice are exceedingly rare. Roberts, in particular, is deeply committed to keeping the court above the political fray as much as possible. One exception to this pattern was his rebuke in 2018 of Trump’s remarks about “Obama judges.”
As he was then, Roberts was absolutely correct to now to call out Schumer. Justices are not meant to be held accountable for their rulings to the public in the way legislators and presidents are for their policies; they are only subject to impeachment as a check on their power. So there’s no plausible excuse for Schumer’s threat, and Roberts was right to call it “dangerous.” If, as many fear, the conservatives on the Supreme Court do impose their views on the country beyond what is thought to be acceptable, there could be legitimate avenues for checking the justices’ power. These include passing constitutional amendments or even, potentially, changing the size of the court or passing a rule mandating a retirement age. But while these reforms might be warranted, they should not be considered making Kavanaugh and Gorsuch “pay a price.”