Industrialism Is Bad for Our Health: The Series Continues

Posted on by

Yves here. KLG today focuses on new research on how hunter-gatherers have much more and more diverse intestinal flora, and what that says about their health and our diets.

By KLG, who has held research and academic positions in three US medical schools since 1995 and is currently Professor of Biochemistry and Associate Dean. He has performed and directed research on protein structure, function, and evolution; cell adhesion and motility; the mechanism of viral fusion proteins; and assembly of the vertebrate heart. He has served on national review panels of both public and private funding agencies, and his research and that of his students has been funded by the American Heart Association, American Cancer Society, and National Institutes of Health

What have we done?  Toxic “forever chemicals” that make life easier, in the short run, such as found in the cheap non-stick frying pan that works no better than your grandmother’s well-seasoned cast iron skillet, an artifact that will last forever.  Ground water mined at rates far beyond natural replenishment for industrial agriculture where rain is scarce. The expanding hypoxic dead zone at the mouth of the Mississippi, the watershed of which extends from Louisiana to North Carolina, New York, Minnesota, the Dakotas, Montana, Alberta, Wyoming, Colorado, and New Mexico (1,151,000 square miles).  Microplastics everywhere and in everything, from filter-feeding mussels to you and me.

And then there is the “Western Diet” of food-like substances, which has been a concomitant of the post-WWII industrialization of agriculture in the United States.  Industrial Agriculture is a category mistake nourished by a market fundamentalism that has led inexorably to misery, pathology, and environmental degradation.  Although a large part of the implicit foundation of this post, our “Modern Food System” is beyond the scope of the topic for today.  In my view the best place to begin with our agricultural predicament is The Unsettling of America: Culture & Agriculture by Wendell Berry.  Originally published in 1977, this essential book is still in print.  I am on probably my fifth reading copy, as I tend to give them away.  The Pleasures of Eating is a good summary of his argument: Eating is an agricultural act.

The transformation of our diet began in the 1950s with the “Diet-Heart Hypothesis.”  Despite millennia of practical wisdom [1], this can be summarized (incorrectly) as “eat fat, get fat,” with bad things happening to your heart as a result.  Fat and protein calories were replaced by fat substitutes (e.g., margarine and vegetable oil) and refined carbohydrates.  Sugar, which is not toxic in moderation, has been replaced with high-fructose corn syrup in many of our “staples.” [2] What has rightfully become known as the “obesity epidemic” is a most obvious result.  This has recently been in the news in the form of Ozempic, which is unlikely to end well as drugs that are effective in the treatment of Type 2 diabetes, which is often caused by obesity, are used as (powerful and expensive) weight loss shortcuts (there are no lasting weight loss shortcuts).  One already hears of “Ozempic butt,” which undoubtedly will be treated with implants in those who have not already had one that is shrinking nonetheless.  First world problems lead to first world solutions, some of which have been as awful as they have been unnecessary.

Over the past 20 years the biomedical community has learned that the gut microbiome is essential to human health.  We simply cannot live without the hundreds of different species of commensal microorganisms that populate our healthy gut at any one time.  I first learned of the importance of the microbiome about fifteen years ago when preparing a talk about a new treatment for persistent Clostridiodes difficile infectionsC. difficile infection is common in older patients and can be very serious.  This bacterium is ubiquitous but is usually kept in check by a healthy gut microbiome.  Overuse of antibiotics together with a poor diet depletes this microbiome and allows the C. difficile population to bloom.

The new treatment for C. difficile is the fecal microbiota transplant (FMT), which reestablishes a normal gut microbiome when it works.  When I began my talk with the term “fecal transplant,” the pediatrician present, who was at the time primarily a tutor of preclinical medical students, replied in disbelief, “What did you just say?”  The treatment remains “experimental” but has a success rate approaching 85%.  Early do-it-yourself protocols did not work very well, however.

A corollary to the initial C. difficile intervention and other studies is the gut microbiome varies among populations and that different microbiomes may be healthier than others.  Given that the Western Diet is substantially unnatural, the industrial microbiome was immediately suspect, to scientists with imagination.  A recent paper in Cellhas compared our industrial microbiome with that of the Hadza of northern Tanzania, one of the few hunter-gatherer peoples remaining on planet Earth: Ultra-deep sequencing of Hadza hunter-gatherers recovers vanishing gut microbes(Open Access; in print July 6, 2023).  The results are thorough and thoroughly convincing.

From the Abstract/Summary:

The gut microbiome modulates immune and metabolic health.  Human microbiome data are biased toward industrialized populations, limiting our understanding of non-industrialized microbiomes…we performed ultra-deep metagenomic sequencing on 351 fecal samples from the Hadza hunter-gatherers of Tanzania and comparative populations in Nepal and California…recovered 91,662 genomes of bacteria, archaea, bacteriophages, and eukaryotes, 44% of which are absent from existing unified datasets.  We identified 124 gut-resident species vanishing in industrialized populations and highlighted distinct aspects of the Hadza gut microbiome…Industrialized gut microbes were found to be enriched in genes associated with oxidative stress, possibly a result of microbiome adaptation to inflammatory processes. This unparalleled view of the Hadza gut microbiome provides a valuable resource, expands our understanding of microbes capable of colonizing the human gut, and clarifies the extensive perturbation induced by the industrialized lifestyle. [3] (emphasis added)

The major difference between the industrial microbiome and those of more traditional peoples is diversity.  The industrial microbiome is much less diverse, probably because of lifeways that include “(1) consumption of highly processed foods, (2) high rates of antibiotic administration, (3) birth via caesarean section and use of baby formula, (4) sanitation of the living environment, and reduced physical contact with animals and soil” (reviewed by the corresponding authors here, paywall).  Consistent with this observation is that gut microbiomes of immigrants to the United States become “industrialized.”

The industrial versus non-industrial microbiomes are referred to as “BloSSUM (bloom or selected in societies of urbanization/modernization) and VANISH (volatile and/or associated negatively with industrialized societies of humans).  Analysis of coprolites is consistent with the hypothesis that ancient microbiomes resemble current non-industrialized microbiomes more than those from people living in modern industrialized societies.  It follows that during the evolution of the human lineage the human microbiome has also changed, here and here (paywall).

Microbiome research has been limited previously to relatively crude DNA sequencing approaches such as the determination of 16S rRNA sequences [4] from a heterogenous sample.  This allows for the identification of (some of) the species present but is a low-resolution technique.  In the old days of my scientific middle age, genomes were sequenced slowly and (very) expensively one at a time using DNA from the pure, cultured organism – bacterium, yeast, protist, pathogen, virus, human.  In contrast, metagenomic sequencing (construction of whole or nearly whole genomes from environmental samples) allows the researchers to go much deeper into the composition of the microbiome and the relationships among the individual species of the microbiome and the host.  How deep metagenomics works is illustrated in Figure 1 (jpg; first time I have seen that emoji in a scientific paper, Figure 1A).  In contrast to the use of AI and machine learning to construct our Digital Twin and Virtual You, the advances in DNA sequencing technology and the improved analysis of very large datasets used here will actually answer the very good and essential questions asked.

The Hadza include several thousand individuals who live in the central Rift Valley in northern Tanzania.  They live in camps of 5-30 people and move often.  Thus, somewhat off topic but perhaps relevant, the Hadza approximate the “normal” of human group according to Robin Dunbar, whose research has shown that the size of a genuine human community has limits, consisting of a social group of 150; close friends, 50; Very close friends, 15; and inner circle: 5.  The Hazda get their water from springs and streams, and their diet consists of tubers, berries, hunted animals, and honey (one of the genomes recovered in the study samples is that of the honeybee, Apis mellifera).  The result is that 388 metagenomic libraries (33,000,000,000 read pairs) identified:

  • 2,437 prokaryotic (bacterial) species
  • 13,866 bacteriophage (bacterial virus) species
  • 7 eukaryotic species

Summarized in Figure 2 (B,C).  Remarkably, nearly half of the bacterial species 1,125/2,437 (46%) are newly described in this research, indicating that our understanding of the gut microbiome has been deficient.  The eukaryotic species recovered included several amoebae, including Acanthamoeba castellanii, a very distant cousin of animals that can cause corneal damage, and Blastocystis sp., a stramenopile unrelated to animals and mostly harmless.  Overall, how do the Hadza microbiomes differ from others?  To answer this question the microbiomes of two populations from Nepal(one forager, one agrarian) and one population from California were analyzed (Figure 3A).  The results show that the Hadza have a considerably more diverse gut microbiome than the others:

  • Average Hadza: 730 species
  • Average Nepali agriculturalist: 436 species
  • Average Nepali forager, 317 species
  • Average Californian, 277 species

Figure 4 (D, E) shows that VANISH and BloSSUM taxa have different distributions, depending on lifeway.  Remember, the expectation is that we “are” BloSSUM and the Hadza are VANISH.  From the paper (p. 7): “The observed tradeoff between VANISH and BloSSUM taxa across lifestyles poses the question of whether an accompanying trade-off exists with regard to functional capacity in the human gut microbiome.”  Indeed.  Consistent with an affirmative answer, the BloSSUM taxa are enriched in proteins involved in the response to an inflammatory state in the host (Figure 4E: antioxidant/Redox sensing, light blue dots and antibiotic resistance, dark blue dots).  Chronic inflammation is common in the industrial population, particularly as a response to obesity, and we use antibiotics recklessly, both in human populations and industrial agriculture.  Thus, these selection pressures result in variants (mutants) better able to deal with these environmental stresses.

The analysis presented here also shows that one group of the VANISH taxa (phylum Spirochaetota, particularly Treponema succinifaciens, which has been previously associated with the non-industrialized lifeway and identified in paleofeces.    The three diverse Spirochaetota taxa are found in other non-industrial populations, but are absent from the California population Figure 5A.  These data also show that T. succinifaciens was carried along out-of-Africa human dispersal routes in Figure 5C,D, probably linked to close human contact, including mother-infant intergenerational transmission.  Helicobacter pylori, which causes stomach ulcers, is also transmitted in this manner.  Why these two gut bacteria have similar modes of transmission is yet to be determined but is likely to be interesting.

A better understanding of gut microbe global dispersal patterns is also likely to identify mechanisms that promote gut health, which is one more reason why basic research is necessary and useful, but I repeat myself.  A particularly interesting outcome of this work is the identification of evolutionary trajectories in the Hazda gut microbiomes in response to seasonal diet changes, immune evasion, and bacterial virus (phage) predation (Figure 6). [5]

So, what does this all mean, aside from being an astonishing tour de force of modern biology?  The Hadza are a contemporary but not modern people under pressure from what, for lack of a better term, should be called modernity. Although they do face challenges “related to land dispossession” and cultural disruption, it is not clear that “hunger, lack of access to education, healthcare, and political decision making,” conditions that will be ameliorated “by technologies, food, and medicines from urban centers,” are all that necessary for their continued health and survival. What the Hadza need most is to be left alone to live as they have for a very long time.  The world has room for this attractive people (ordered but not read yet; an addition to Evans-Pritchard on the Nuer and the Azande).

The Hadza have much to teach us, and the results of this study will let them do exactly that, as “the data generated from Hadza fecal sample in this study (collected in 2013 – 2014) may thus represent a critical permanent reference point for microbiome scientists to understand the impacts of industrialization on the gut microbiome.”  The authors are circumspect, but these data will be particularly useful as a baseline from which to study the industrial microbiome in comparison to what came before.  In my view, the VANISH taxa found will “represent lineages of microbes that shaped human development throughout our species’ long history as foragers.”  The correlations between the Hadza reference microbiome and human migration patterns will lead to an understanding of which microbes were gained or lost as human populations spread around planet Earth during our long prehistory and until the present day.  Identification of which microbes were gained or lost is a precondition to answering why they were gained or lost.

And the authors are surely correct in their conclusion:

An important challenge is to characterize the impact of these microbes on human physiology and determine in which contexts the absence or presence of species and functions are beneficial or detrimental to human health.  Overall, our results conclusively show that the differences between industrialized and non-industrialized microbiomes go well beyond simple taxonomic membership and diversity.  These findings have substantial implications for how the microbiome may be investigated toward improving the health of both industrialized and non-industrialized populations. (emphasis added)

Although populations such as the Hadza are threatened, the strategy described here will allow other similar populations to provide the broader perspective necessary to better understand the roles of the gut microbiome in human health and evolution.

Which brings us back to the title: Is Industrialism Bad for Our Health?  Despite our remarkable and very real advances in hygiene, living standards, life expectancy, and biomedicine, the answer is, well, yes.  The bad is not an obligatory companion of the good.  As noted in the introduction, industrialism has come with pollution, environmental degradation, and environmental disease.  Modern society is quite pathological, as noted by authors as diverse in perspective as Anne Case and Angus Deaton and Kate Pickett and Richard Wilkinson.  The “Great American Modern Food System” is a complete disaster, from soon-to-be soilless fields in depopulated country to high fructose-laden food-like substances to food insecurity for a distressingly large number of our neighbors.

The same research group recently published a paper showing that Gut-microbiota-targeted diets modulate human immune status (Open Access, 2021).  While a high-fiber diet is healthy, a diet rich in fermented foods has a “noticeable impact on reducing inflammatory markers and modulating immune responses.”  The solution to our dysregulated gut microbiome is not “probiotics,” which are primarily patent medicines that might rebalance your gut or mine.  Placebo or not?  Who knows?  Nor is the solution to eat as a hunter-gatherer.

Rather, the correct response is to eat real food in a diet including unsweetened yoghurt, kombucha, and cottage cheese. This can be done, but not as a product of industrial agriculture, the result of which is the end of one aisle of a large supermarket devoted to “local” produce, including the two bottom shelves devoted to very good local craft beer.  That’s it.  The apples come from New Zealand to a state that in living memory nurtured hundreds of apple growers in its mountains, and the organic tomatoes were shipped more than a thousand miles from Canada.  The cut flowers were flown in from Colombia.  This, in a state with a growing season approaching 300 days a year, but where most production is highly profitable, due to unaccounted real costs plus “farm” subsidies, commodity crops not meant for direct human consumption.  We are not a serious people, but we could be.  Our choice.


[1] “One dies in his full strength, being wholly at ease and secure.  His pails are full of milk, and the marrow of his bones is moist.  Another man dies in the bitterness of his soul, never having eaten with pleasure.” (NKJV, Job 21: 23-25; thank you to LS for this reminder of my Sunday School lessons long ago).

[2] Carbotoxicity – Noxious Effects of Carbohydrates is the title of a review in the premier biochemistry, cell and molecular biology journal Cell in late 2018.  I thought this might lead to a breakthrough in appreciation of the problem.  Alas, the article has been cited fewer than 50 times in nearly five years.  That the authors are European is no accident.  Still, I expect that their perspective will become the accepted view of human nutrition and health, eventually.

[3] “Lifestyle” is the term used throughout this paper.  “Lifeway” is perhaps the better term, based on my experience in the Anthropology Department at the expense of taking a microbiology class, or several.  This research is as much cultural/physical anthropology as it is modern molecular biology and molecular evolution.  Thus, lifeway seems to be the more apt term in my view, one that also lacks a certain connotation.

[4] Ribosomes, which are the machines that turn mRNA into protein in all cells, contain ribosomal RNA (rRNA) that is easily sequenced.  Different sequences are diagnostic of different groups, but sometimes the sequences are from unknown taxa.  Deeper sequence data (e.g., for protein-encoding genes) is much more useful for identifying taxa in the microbiome.

[5] Undoubtedly too much information, but the molecular evolutionist in me cannot resist:  The genetic code (in the original and correct usage; i.e., not the same as the genome sequence which is commonly called a “genetic code” analogous to computer code, which it also is not) is degenerate, meaning that the third position (sometimes more) of a codon triplet specifying a particular amino acid can vary.  In one of the major advances in molecular evolution (1991), it was shown that genes subject to diversifying/directional/positive selection have higher pN/pS ratios (non-synonymous change/synonymous change) that genes not under selective pressure.  Thus, in populations of gut microbiota that must adapt due to a dynamic environment, changes in the genes encoding proteins that mediate interactions with the host and bacterial viruses will have a higher ratio pN/pS ratio than “housekeeping” proteins that do just that (metabolism, protein synthesis, DNA replication and repair) to keep the bacterium alive.  The utility of the pN/pS ratio depends on evolutionary time. pN/pS changes from deep evolutionary time are not useful in identifying positive selection.  The ratio is very useful for populations such as the gut microbiome, which are accessible and evolve in real time.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email


  1. eernesto

    ok, if industrialism is that bad, the sir can lead by example and de-industrialize himself. Otherwise they are imperialist stories to put the colonies to sleep, just a bandit.

  2. Kristiina

    Thank you for this! This is more important for the survival of our species than what goes on in the stock market. We western diet-victims have been losing in a game we did not even know we are participating in.

  3. John R Moffett

    I have written about this a couple years ago in a journal review article, and it is interesting that there is evidence that including foods in the diet that contain some of the more healthy byproducts of the diverse bacterial species will provide some of the benefits of a greater diversity of gut microbes. One good example is good old vinegar, which is basically acetic acid. Many gut bacteria turn non-digestible fiber into acetic acid and this then goes through metabolism to generate acetyl-CoA, which in turn regulates gene expression (by, for example, histone acetylation) throughout the body in helpful ways. So part of the healthiness of the Mediterranean diet may be the generous use of vinegar.

    But the key problem is that many people just don’t understand how important diet is because it is not taught in school anymore. It might help to make health and diet a major part of the curricula in public schools and colleges.

  4. Carla

    KLG, thank you for this fascinating and deeply informative post. Just a few of the references will keep me busy for months. I appreciate all of the wisdom you impart to NC, but this piece in particular rang a lot of bells for me.

  5. Susan the other

    I went on a 6/18 diet over a 4 year period. And I liked it so much I’m still on it. I learned to appreciate a feeling of being empty. Something I was not familiar with before. So now I think it’s a little strange to expect a healthy result from habitually eating 3-meals-a-day. The curious thing is that now when I am hungry it’s usually for a piece of fruit or some raw carrots. And I’m also suspecting there is an unrecognized benefit to regularly consuming your own fat stores. Wondering if human fat is an ultra nutritious processed food, as well as personally customized.

    1. W Pedersen

      I think that is a great point. I’ve been eating sauerkraut, yogurt, etc. also, eating only during an 8 hour window. I really feel lighter and more rested in the morning. This is great treatment for IBS and colitis, not to mention diabetes.

  6. Jeremy Grimm

    My first thought after reading this post, was to wonder what the Hadza thought about this research. I imagine there are a few funny stories going around about those odd outsiders who collected samples for this study.

    Learning more about the gut microbiome and other microbiomes is important and interesting. I am not entirely sure what applications such knowledge might have in the future, and I do not believe applications are necessary to justify the Science. I could be wrong, but I suspect the fetishism of “you are what you eat” is peculiar to the u.s Populace. I think many people in the world are more concerned about having enough to eat.

    I feel that the word “industrialism” does not quite describe the nature of the industrial production processes the u.s. once enjoyed, and it does not capture the nature of the production processes characteristic of Big Ag. I believe Neoliberal policies and practices are not a necessary component of industrialism and the Neoliberal excesses of the last forty and more years are something specially distasteful — particularly in regard to food and good eating. The hypoxic dead zone in the Gulf of Mexico, the proliferation of microplastics, the pathology and environmental degradation, giantism of u.s. Business enterprises — I believe these are but some of the many horrors of Neoliberal Political Economic policies. I also think “market fundamentalism” to describe Neoliberal policies dangerously misunderstands and underestimates the harm Neoliberalism has and will fashion.

    I live in a rural area and can buy some local produce when it is in season. The prices charged usually match or exceed the prices for produce from the supermarket. The Amish grown produce is often even more expensive. I am not sure why except that people who can, will hunt for the local produce and pay the higher prices. I also believe the relatively higher prices reflect the difference in the subsidies available to smaller farms compared to the subsidies that flow to Big Ag. Judging from discussions with one local Amish farmer, many if not all of the Amish will not take government subsidies. I am not sure what impact Wendell Berry’s “Eating is an agricultural act.” might have on the flows of government subsidies. I think I would have to assume a market and government response to the will of the Populace — other than word-service and advertising campaigns — that I have not seen in evidence for several decades.

  7. Lex

    Very interesting research, so many thanks for the summary. I always go a little side eye when someone starts going on about “gut health”. Not that I don’t believe in, I absolutely do, but it sometimes takes on an air of miracle cure for everything. I also accept that the miracle cure for everything is also a symptom of our times.

    The question I’m asking myself after reading though is whether industrialism is the root cause or something else. There’s no question that agriculture will be more damaging to land than hunter-gatherer-cultivator, but I don’t think that intensive, so potentially describable as industrial, agriculture needs to be as damaging to the land as it currently is. There’s nothing inherently wrong with supplying a particular input for agriculture, working large tracts, etc.

    There’s a lot wrong with applying an input to excess, continually monocropping large tracts without organic soil building, creating awful manure lagoons, etc. But we don’t do those things to feed people, we do them to maximize profit. We do them so that a hamburger costs $1 and we can maximize every profit between cattle feed and the hamburger customer.

    So I wonder if there’s a way to feed cities of millions without industrial agriculture (which I would call indoor agriculture the pinnacle of, regardless of how close it can be to a consumer), and I have to conclude there isn’t. Which leads to is there a way to perform industrial agriculture that isn’t as wasteful, damaging and unhealthy as ours is. I guess I have to hope that there is, though I don’t hold much that we’ll work towards it with critical mass.

  8. Synoia

    Not new news, Including the martial references.: Composed Nearly 300 years ago:

    1 And did those feet in ancient time
    walk upon England’s mountains green?
    And was the holy Lamb of God
    on England’s pleasant pastures seen?
    And did the countenance divine
    shine forth upon our clouded hills?
    And was Jerusalem builded here
    among these dark satanic mills?

    2 Bring me my bow of burning gold!
    Bring me my arrows of desire!
    Bring me my spear! O clouds, unfold!
    Bring me my chariot of fire!
    I will not cease from mental fight,
    nor shall my sword sleep in my hand,
    till we have built Jerusalem
    in England’s green and pleasant land.

    Source: Ancient and Modern: hymns and songs for refreshing worship

    Author: William Blake
    Meter: D
    Language: English
    Copyright: Public Domain

    Blake, William, poet and painter, born 1757, and died 1827

Comments are closed.