This is Naked Capitalism fundraising week. 860 donors have already invested in our efforts to combat corruption and predatory conduct, particularly in the financial realm. Please join us and participate via our donation page, which shows how to give via check, credit card, debit card or PayPal or our new payment processor, Clover. Read about why we’re doing this fundraiser, what we’ve accomplished in the last year,, and our current goal, rewarding our guest bloggers.
Yves here. This post discusses a simmering issue that is coming to a boil: how politicians around the world have been committing themselves to meeting carbon reduction and/or green energy goals, but then go about them in a half-hearted or even contradictory manner because they don’t want to get voted out of office for having imposed too many costs on consumers.
This result comes about from a multitude of factors. First is the lack of any real sacrifice from the top, particularly from the pols themselves. And I don’t mean cheap gestures like more bicycle riding. Taxing private jets severely or even barring landing privileges if they have low seat density would be a starter. The second is the failure to even attempt to sell to voters why tackling climate change is necessary and why the particular measures being implemented are worthwhile. It’s not hard to see that these initiatives are largely uncoordinated one-offs that are the worst of all worlds: they do hurt certain populations without doing anywhere near enough in aggregate.
The third is engaging in the self-defeating policy in the UK and many EU countries of subsidizing energy use last winter in response to the loss of access to cheap Russian pipeline gas. The odds of a repeat this winter are pretty good.
By Irina Slav, a writer for Oilprice.com with over a decade of experience writing on the oil and gas industry. Originally published at OilPrice
- Rising living expenses in the EU are causing conflicts over climate change mitigation efforts, with members like Poland and Germany expressing concerns.
- The European Parliament remains committed to increasing low-carbon energy targets despite growing opposition and economic challenges.
- The EU’s push for local production of low-carbon tech faces competition from China, raising concerns about the feasibility and cost of achieving climate goals.
Consistently higher living expenses have deepened a rift among—and within—EU members about tackling climate change and moving away from oil, gas, and coal.
The development has been anything but surprising, as higher energy costs had millions of Europeans struggling to make ends meet. Yet Brussels remains adamant that the transition must happen as planned. Or almost.
This spring, the ruling coalition in Germany proposed a bill aiming to phase out gas heating systems and replace them with electrical ones that draw energy from sources such as wind and solar.
The proposal caused protests in parts of Germany as people refused to shoulder the cost of retrofitting houses and residential buildings with heat pump systems.
Eventually, the German parliament last week passed a watered-down version of the proposal in a bid to calm public nerves.
Meanwhile, earlier this year, Poland filed a lawsuit against the EU about some of Brussels’ climate policies, arguing that these would impose an unbearable burden on its citizens.
One of these policies was the planned ban on new internal combustion engine car sales from 2035, which the European Commission believes would be a major step towards moving to a low-carbon future.
“The contested regulation imposes excessive burdens connected with the transition towards zero-emission mobility on European citizens, especially those who are less well off, as well as on the European automotive companies sector,” Poland said.
The Central European country also railed against national emission reduction targets, saying these would undermine its energy security. Poland is overwhelmingly dependent on coal for its power generation.
Germany, for all its efforts to reduce its dependence on hydrocarbons, also recently increased its dependence on coal: utility RWE recently began dismantling a wind farm in order to expand a lignite coal mine after the government shut down Germany’s last three nuclear reactors.
France is also against some new climate policies pushed by Brussels, specifically rules concerning levels of exhaust pipe emissions, along with another seven member states. These include Poland again, Bulgaria, Hungary, Italy, Romania, the Czech Republic, and Slovakia.
“These new rules would divert the industry’s investments from achieving the net-zero transition pathway,” the eight said.
The main problem these member states have is that the cost of the transition to net zero is already beginning to be felt by their citizens. Since no rational government would risk its re-election chances by angering the majority of voters, they are now looking for ways to slow these climate policies down or do away with them altogether.
As Bloomberg put it in a recent report, “Polls show most European voters want action on climate change as heat waves, wild fires and floods make the impact of emissions ever clearer — but they’re reluctant to bear the cost of switching to less-polluting technology.”
Despite rising popular opposition, the European parliament this week voted to increase low-carbon energy targets, now aiming to generate over 42% of its electricity from wind, solar, and other low-carbon sources of energy.
To facilitate the buildup, the European parliament also approved faster permitting processes for new wind and solar installations.
The vote came amid warnings from wind and solar developers in the bloc that higher raw material and lending costs are jeopardizing their projects. Danish Orsted sounded the alarm earlier this year, although it focused on the UK, calling for more state subsidies.
Several solar developers in the EU, for their part, warned cheap Chinese panels were undermining their own profitability thanks to generous subsidies from Beijing and cheaper labor. The European Union has ambitions to manufacture 30 GW of solar power technology at home by 2030.
Today, in her State of the Union address, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen doubled down on transition ambitions, slamming China for its “unfair trade practices,” which “affected our solar industry.”
She also highlighted the EU’s plans to go local in terms of transition supply chains, stating that “From wind to steel, from batteries to electric vehicles, our ambition is crystal clear: The future of our clean tech industry has to be made in Europe.”