After Nigeria’s eNaira Disaster, Another “Live” Central Bank Digital Currency, Jamaica’s Jam-Dex, Founders

Just three countries have so far introduced CBDCs, according to the IMF, and two of them are already having serious issues. 

The roll-out of central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), while still in its early stages, is not going as smoothly as the central banking community may have hoped. The latest central bank to admit to serious difficulties is the Bank of Jamaica (BOJ) whose governor Richard Byles has acknowledged that the rollout of the country’s CBDC, the Jam-Dex, has been a lot slower than originally anticipated. In fact, the total amount of Jam-Dex in circulation has remained stuck at just 230 million Jamaican dollars (USD 1.47 million) since the first — and so far only — batch of the digital currency was “minted” 19 months ago.

The Jam-Dex is one of just three fully-launched retail CBDCs in the world, according to the IMF, alongside the Bahamian sand dollar and Nigeria’s eNaira.

“Being one of the first in the world has its unique challenges,” Byles said at the BOJ’s quarterly monetary policy report press conference last Wednesday. “What we are finding in the roll-out is that as we address an issue and move ahead, another one pops up. I guess that’s what you get for being amongst the first; you don’t have a road map set out by others, but we are determined.”

Jamaica’s “Rapid” Transition Toward a “Fully Digital Society”

Contrast this message with the much more confident tone struck by Jamaica’s Prime Minister Andrew Holness in a speech on Jamaica’s “rapid” transition toward a “fully digital society” last July:

In the coming weeks and days I’ll be making certain announcements regarding the acceleration of Jamaica’s intention to become a fully digital society. We are well on our way to this. We have established the national identification system, we have put in place our digital currency, we have given directions to our ministries to digitalise their operations. Most of our ministries are now moving from paper-based systems to digital systems. Our military is transitioning. Society is moving very quickly to become digital.

Our banking consumers are seeing it as well because the banks are moving very rapidly to digital. You have something now called artificial intelligence. Very soon this position of a human being exchanging cash, that is going to soon disappear from the banking system very soon and you are going to have to interface with machines. I don’t want it to be scary but it is a thought that we all have to embrace.

Many Jamaicans, it seems, are not ready to do that. Shortly after making his speech, Holness had to row back his comments following a public backlash over the idea of cash being removed from the system, as happened in Nigeria just over a year ago (more on that later). Holness labelled any suggestions as “irrational” and the result of widespread disinformation, arguing that the government has just invested billions of Jamaican dollars in upgrading Jamaica’s cash notes. Which seems like a fair point — until you hear what the central bank governor just said:

“When you look at all of the cash problems and complaints, fundamentally, digitising is the only solution. All those issues go away with digital transactions, credit cards, debit cards, wallets, CBDC, that’s what we want in this country. The use of cash is really quite high and creates problems that are intractable.

According to a report on Jamaica Live News, most Jamaicans do not want a central bank digital currency anyway:

“The majority of the Jamaican public argue that do not agree to a digital currency and feel they are been bamboozled into it. Most Jamaicans use cash on a daily basis and many do not have a bank account. The consensus amongst Jamaicans, are, crime is a bigger and more urgent problem and they do not understand why the government is making the digital currency a priority.”

Also, Holness’ claim that banks are rushing to embrace the CDBC is plain wrong. As Jamaican Observer reports, just one national lender, National Commercial Bank of Jamaica (NCB), has so far agreed to participate in the BOJ’s pilot test of digital currency through its NCB. It is the only bank currently able to facilitate Jam-Dex transactions. That’s after 19 months of Jam-Dex operations:

JN Bank was expected to follow suit shortly after but is yet to launch its own
JN Pay digital wallet.

Two other banks, JMMB Bank and First Global Bank also stated their intention to incorporate CBDC-related services in their businesses but have not stated a timeline for roll-out.

“The take-up is still lower than what we desire at this time. The main reason is merchant adoption. Most of the larger merchants would prefer if Jam-Dex payments go through a single point-of-sale machine, so what we are doing is testing a solution in the sandbox for the use of a dynamic QR code.

“It’s really about the customer experience, they don’t want another device, they want the same machine that takes the debit and credit card,” deputy governor, banking, currency operations and payment system at the BOJ, Natalie Haynes, said…

In the meantime, she said that two more banks are expected to join NCB in the acceptance of Jam-Dex transactions by the middle of this year.

At last count, the NCB platform was said to have over 200,000 ‘Lynkies’, or users, who can conduct peer-to-peer transfers and digital payments at over 4,000 micro merchants, predominantly in the food and beverage, fashion, and consumer goods categories.

This is barely an improvement on figures cited by a Financial Times article from July 2023, according to which the total number of Jam-Dex customers as of February 2023 — over a year ago — was 190,000. Total transactions for 2022 were valued at $357mn, “less than 0.01 per cent of Jamaica’s $4.7tn electronic retail transactions for that year and 0.1 per cent of currency in circulation.” As the article notes, total transactions would have been higher if the service had been available throughout 2022, but it is still “a drop in the Caribbean sea.”

In a bid to boost take-up, the finance ministry announced two incentive programmes — the “Small/Micro Merchant Incentive Program”, which proposed to reward 10,000 food stores, gas stations and salons with a J$25,000 ($164) deposit, and the “Wallet-holder Individual Loyalty Program”, which provides regular users with loyalty points that can be redeemed for cashback — but to little apparent avail.

Lessons from Nigeria

A similar story has already played out in Nigeria, Africa’s largest economy and most populous nation. Launched in October to great fanfare, Nigeria’s eNaira also had minimal impact on the country’s economy and citizens. Like the Jam-Dex, the eNaira is account based, not token-based. In Nigeria, as in Jamaica, banks had little interest in promoting the new currency while most Nigerians had no interest and/or no means of using the CBDC. Within nine months of its launch, around 700,000 people had downloaded an eNaira wallet — a thoroughly underwhelming number in a country with an estimated population of 225 million people.

That number has crept up since then but only as a result of drastic measures taken by the CBN that have had a devastating impact on the country’s economy. In October 2022, a year after the eNaira’s launch, the CBN announced a redesign policy for the naira, citing a whole host of reasons. Chief among them was the desire, ultimately, to do away with cash. The CBN Governor and chief architect of the eNaira Godfrey Efemiele, said: “The destination, as far as I am concerned, is to achieve a 100 percent cashless economy in Nigeria”.

The central bank said it would begin issuing redesigned high-value notes from mid-December and gave residents until the end of January to turn in their old notes. The problems began in earnest shortly thereafter. In a matter of weeks the CBN withdrew high-denomination notes from circulation while failing to replace them with the newly designed notes it had promised, triggering a cash crunch as the money supply in circulation decreased faster than its demand.

By March 2023, Nigerian citizens had returned a little over 1.3 trillion naira — just over 40% of the 3.2 trillion naira in circulation — of old notes to financial institutions while the CBN had minted only 3-billion-naira worth of eNaira, accounting for only 0.09 percent of the total cash supply. The CBN also placed stringent limits on the daily cash withdrawals of anyone who could access cash. Many couldn’t. The result was unmitigated chaos and economic pain.

Nigeria’s GDP plunged by a record 15% in the first quarter of that year while its currency crisis deteriorated, pushing inflation higher. In March, the central bank finally paused the cash swap program until the end of the year, but only at the dogged insistence of Nigeria’s Supreme Court. By then the lives, jobs and businesses of untold numbers of people had been upended. Yet the overwhelming majority of people still clung to cash or used some form of barter currency. As I reported in June, they had no possible means of using digital payment methods anyway since most people do not own a smart phone or have regular access to the Internet:

Of Nigeria’s approximate population of 220 million, between 25 million and 40 million people actually have a smart phone [though that number is expected to grow rapidly in the coming years]. More than half of the population is unbanked.

In other words, the overwhelming majority of Nigerians had no possible means of using digital payment methods even if they had wanted to. As more than half of the cash was drained from the economy, they had no means of transacting. Many of them took to the streets to protest. Banks were vandalised; some were even burnt to the ground. At the height of the protests, in mid-February, a coalition of civil society groups demanded that the CBN issue the new notes and end the suffering of millions of Nigerians — a demand that was rejected by the central bank and the Buhari government.

Amidst all this chaos, the number of e-Naira wallets reportedly increased more than 12-fold to 13 million, as millions of middle and upper-class Nigerians began downloading them. But are they actually using them?

Most of the people who downloaded the eNaira app in its first year of operations did not bother to use it. In a May 2023 working paper, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) — which played a key role in the CBDC’s development and roll-out — described the Nigerian public’s adoption and usage of the CBDC in the first year as “disappointingly low,” with fewer than 2% of the downloaded eNaira wallets actually being used:

The average number of eNaira transactions since its inception amounts to about 14,000 per
week—only 1.5 percent of the number of wallets out there. This means that 98.5 percent of wallets, for any given week, have not been used even once. The average value of eNaira transaction[s] has been 923 million naira per week—0.0018 percent of the average amount of M3 during this period. The average value per one transaction has been 60,000 naira.

Today, the future of the eNaira is clouded in uncertainty. Just over a year ago, rumours began flying that the CBN was looking for help to redesign and relaunch the digital currency. The CBDC may have been a total flop so far but the IMF, which helped design the system, still sees room for potential, especially now that the CBN is apparently moving to the second phase of the eNaira’s incremental roll-out: expanding its coverage to (1) people without bank accounts (but with mobile phones) and (2) those without internet access, largely by offering eNaira to the country’s legions of poor through social cash transfer programs.

The future is less bright for the CBN’s former governor, Godwin Emefiele, who worked alongside the IMF in launching the CBDC. After spending June to November in jail, he was released on bail. But he faces a long (and growing) list of charges including fraud and embezzlement. His replacement at the central bank’s helm, Olayemi Cardoso, is reportedly considering dropping his predecessor’s eNaira programme and the naira redesign policy. The new Tinubu government is also apparently considering granting a consortium of banks, fintechs and blockchain firms a license to launch a naira-based stable coin.

From Business Day:

The CBN under the current governor, Olayemi Cardoso, has yet to announce the retirement of the eNaira but experts who believe there is no future for the central bank digital currency, say the eNaira will be eased out of the system and its place taken by the cNGN.

The promoters of cNGN including Access Bank, Providus Bank, Sterling Bank, First Bank, and a few fintech companies, are keen to not associate the stablecoin with the eNaira, launched by the Godwin Emefiele-led CBN. But try as they may, the ghost of the eNaira would not be that easy to shake off, according to experts.

Another problem is that the naira, even by its usual standards, is anything but stable right now, having crumbled from 460 to a dollar in February last year to 1,540 today. Much of that collapse was due to the Tunubu government’s disastrous decision to remove the country’s fuel subsidy while also lifting the dollar peg. In a desperate bid to regain control of the naira, the government has suspended crypto exchanges like Binance, Coinbase, and Kraken from trading. It has also closed thousands of bureaux de change.

Nonetheless, the fact that the currency of the world’s first major economy to try to launch a CBDC is now hanging by a thread hardly serves as a ringing endorsement for central bank digital currencies.

Central bankers in more advanced economies will presumably try to draw lessons from the eNaira’s failures and the Jam-Dex’s ongoing difficulties. As the IMF noted in a November 2021 report, the roll out of the eNaira was being closely watched by the outside world — including by other central banks. But the mere fact that two out of the first three CBDCs have had such an underwhelming impact so far while the chief architect of the eNaira is facing a litany of criminal charges may have a chilling effect in emerging economies, particularly in Africa.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

22 comments

  1. Spork

    The first time I ever heard of something that sounded like CBDC was when Steve Keen described it as a method for direct stimulus… ie. US citizens would all have an account at the Fed and gov’t created money could be deposited there. During a financial crisis or a pandemic, money could be deposited into everyone’s account, bypassing the whole private financial system. Conditions could be made that would require the money be used to pay down any out standing debt before spending on anything else. Such a system would presumably have addressed the mortgage crisis while allowing people to stay in their homes. It seemed like a good idea to me.

    Since then I have only seen it discussed as an idea with nefarious undertones… as part of an effort to eliminate cash.

    Can the good aspects of the CBDC idea be separated from the bad? What is the difference between CBDC and the idea of banking as a public utility? Perhaps I am misunderstanding something about what Steve was describing.

    1. Mike

      In theory (hypothesis?) the initial promise of CBDC could be fulfilled by any banking system that was honestly about growing citizen savings and productive use of money. However, the current political and economic system and its primary actors prevent the suggestion from even being uttered in important company. In the US, our government is too tied to private/public partnership with little regulation that would allow the current corrupt practices to continue. Anyone out there with a way to circumvent this?

    2. hk

      That would also address a major problem: increasing % of US population, esp less well to do, are denied access to banking. Big banks are getting rid of old fashioned checking accounts in favor of strange one with a lot of strings and fees attached (I was amused to find that my bank, one of the big ones, has stopped offering regular checking accounts some years ago and I’m grandfathered in only bc I’d been banking there for almost 30 years). The downside, of course, is that that would mean USG would have effectively nationalized retail banking to a large degree with all the attendant implications…

    3. digi_owl

      I think Keen’s basic idea hinged on the notion that government can spend money into existence, akin to Modern Monetary Theory.

      These CBDCs on the other hand looks more like bitcoin without the distributed ledger. Aka they want to maintain the seniorage of the private banking system via lending, while also being able to track where every last cent goes once in circulation.

      Even as central banks acknowledge how wrong it is, there are still powerful parties in the economy that desperately want to think in terms of gold and silver coinage. And for them, bitcoin and similar is the closest they have come to recreating it digitally.

      Perhaps because it appeal to their hoarding instinct, and potentially allow them to corner the market and become kingmaker.

  2. TomDority

    Conditions could be made that would require the money be used to pay down any out standing debt before spending on anything else. Such a system would presumably have addressed the mortgage crisis while allowing people to stay in their homes.
    So just another way of bailing out the financial geniuses through the public purse – I suppose just eliminating the middlemen you could eliminate outstanding debt, poverty, unemployment etc. without a digital currency

  3. The Rev Kev

    I find myself very much surprised that this experiment is being done in Jamaica. in his book ” Treasure Islands”, Nicholas Shaxon describes the shadowy world of off-shore banking that is used to hide wealthy people’s money and he notes the enormous number of corporations who have a office located in one of these islands, though it actually may just be a letter box. The point is that Jamaica is one of these “treasure islands” so why would the wealthy people there allow this hair-brained experiment to go ahead and potentially put their own wealth at risk? The only thing that comes to mind is that a lot of these people are libertarian in belief and so are true believers in digital currency.

      1. CA

        Jamaica experienced only 21% real per capita growth in 45 years, and had real per capita GDP that was just below $13,000 in 2023, compared with Mexico at just below $25,000 or Dominican Republic at $25,500.

    1. digi_owl

      The shadow accounts on Jamaica are unlikely to be denominated in the local currency.

      Most likely they are in USD, GBP and/or EUR.

      1. CA

        “The shadow accounts on Jamaica are unlikely to be denominated in the local currency.”

        I am reminded of a film, I happened to watch not long ago:

        Island In The Sun (1957)
        Harry Belafonté

    2. CA

      Notice that Jamaica has just formed a strategic partnership with China:

      https://english.news.cn/20240122/3bcaa718596943a484a938782dd6db84/c.html

      January 22, 2024

      China, Jamaica highlight fruits of bilateral cooperation

      KINGSTON — Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi and Jamaican Minister of Foreign Affairs and Foreign Trade Kamina Johnson Smith highlighted fruitful results of bilateral cooperation during their meeting in the Jamaican capital of Kingston on Saturday.

      Johnson Smith expressed her pleasure to receive the Chinese foreign minister at Jamaica’s new foreign ministry building, one of China’s aid projects in the country. Noting that Jamaica is the first English-speaking Caribbean country to support the one-China principle and has since adhered to this position, she said Jamaica is proud of this tradition and will continue to unswervingly stick to the one-China principle.

      Johnson Smith said the two countries enjoy solid mutual political trust, highly compatible ideas, mutually beneficial cooperation, and active people-to-people exchanges, yielding fruitful results in their strategic partnership…

  4. vao

    I had already commented on those CBDC schemes, noting that in Africa, a form of digital currency / digital payment scheme that is successful, widespread, is integrated with cash, works on simple mobile phones, and does not require bank accounts or fancy tech like blockchains had been existing for quite some time: M-Pesa.

    The fact that countries like Nigeria, which does not have M-Pesa, look for complex schemes that require banking, smartphones, and the involvement of a central bank makes me think that those CBDC projects are actually pushed by the Western financial sector and comprador African elites with a view to control financial flows within African countries (which they cannot do because of the cash-based nature of the economies there), and do not constitute an organic movement originating from leading African economic circles. But that is just a hunch.

    1. digi_owl

      Keep in mind though that with m-pesa the telco basically becomes the bank, as they hold the ledger of transactions.

      I think Japan has something similar where the telcos function as credit card issuers, allowing the phone to replace the physical card (predating Apple and Google’s equivalent by at least a decade).

      1. vao

        The telecom operators actually have an appropriate banking license to operate M-Pesa.

        As far as I know, there are several kinds: managing current accounts and enabling transfers; asset management; providing loans, mortgage credits, etc; acting as a correspondent for wire transfers in foreign currencies; and so on. Those telecom operators have a license of the first kind, if I remember correctly. Their big advantage is that they are, because of their original business line, organized to deal efficiently with a very large number of very small transactions (basically, as low as a cent — or the equivalent fractional currency in African countries), something that banks are neither willing, nor equipped to do, but that the unbanked, generally poor populations relying upon M-Pesa, need.

        Mobile Internet in Japan was at least a decade in advance of what would become available on the much-touted “disruptive” iPhone and Android devices — mobile payments, video-calls, app stores (commission: 11%, not 30%), high-end cameras… Alas, the insular Japanese telecommunication industry never managed to promote its standards in foreign countries at a scale that would make a difference.

        1. digi_owl

          Gets me thinking of why the net didn’t develop an ISP mediated payment system unlike the phone networks. Because the ISPs were initially small mom and pop services that didn’t have the infra or personal to handle billing disputes or investigate fraud, something the phone companies had built up over decades of operation.

          And yeah, the same kind of minimal sum needed is also what makes those online subscriptions so high as they have to cover the transaction fees from the payment processor.

          It feels like the IT world is cursed to reinvent the wheel over and over, because there is a continual influx of starry eyed “kids” that have little experience or knowledge about existing infrastructure or services. But they have, or had, is a near endless stream of VC money to be “disruptive” with.

          So the outcome is much the same as Tesla lamented about Edison. Where the latter would spend time trying idea after idea after idea, rather than sit down and think through the physics of what he was trying to achieve.

  5. Ghost in the Machine

    In 2011, my family was visiting San Diego when they had their big blackout. We had a condo, but no food in it. We used cash to buy some groceries, including spaghetti and bottled sauce. The little store tallied things up on a hand calculator. We cooked it on the porch gas grill. The weather was pleasant and all in all we had a fine time walking on a beach after dinner. Making all transactions dependent on a functioning grid and internet seems insane to me even independent of the obvious desires of authorities to use it as a control mechanism. It should be resisted and undermined by all citizenries everywhere.

    The military was converting? Seems like an obvious weak point for a cyber attack.

    1. Ejf

      I was thinking the same… and all former Brit colonies.
      But doesn’t Ukraine have its own coin/id thingy?
      Strange: all places with minerals, mines, and the unseen hand of those who take…

  6. Synoia

    In Nigeria there used to be little trust between The Government and and the people.

    Digital currencies require high levels of trust between the Bankers and the Banked, and a trusr that collection of taxes is honestly governed.

    Even in the west there is little trust between average people and the very Rich, as the rich have access to money that has avoided or escaped taxation.

    The system for digital currencies needs to become trusted, and that Includes a system seen to not to favor the rich.

  7. Yaiyen

    If this digital money pass in EU and USA wouldn’t it be impossible for the elites to hide there money from tax if so why are they pushing digital money

  8. digi_owl

    I always find it a bit of a record scratch when i see the word consumer used where it would be more appropriate to use customer. Never mind that the term consumer more and more brings to mind cattle chewing cud…

  9. WillD

    I’m not surprised all three countries are having problems with digital currencies. They are all relatively poor countries whose peoples do not have high levels of trust in their governments. So they see, quite rightly, digital currencies as depriving them of monetary independence and forcing them to be reliant on invisible technologies over which they have no control.

    They can’t keep digital money in their pockets or under their beds anymore. They can’t buy or sell things without the transactions being recorded and therefore visible to the authorities. They lose all financial freedoms and independence.

    This will be the same in all countries that introduce CBDCs. Nobody except governments wants them.

    We already have ‘digital’ currencies through our banks using contactless payments and cards. Many of us never use cash at all anymore – so why do we need CBDCs if not to let governments take control of our money?

Comments are closed.