Taking money out of the bank becomes a Kafkaesque nightmare. Anyone looking to withdraw more than $3,000 of their own money must notify the State in advance as well as explain the reason(s) for the withdrawal, or face fines.
It was only eight days ago that Spain suffered its biggest blackout in recent history. As we reported on the day, without the widespread culture of cash use in the country the chaos would have been far worse:
Unlike some other parts of Europe, cash is still King in Spain, albeit a slightly diminished one, accounting for 57% of in-store payments, according to the Bank of Spain’s latest annual household survey. As such, most local people were able to make emergency purchases and many customer-facing businesses were able to continue operating. I cannot imagine the sort of chaos that would reign if something similar were to happen in my native United Kingdom, where the overwhelming majority of people do not use cash, or in cashless Sweden, where the amount of cash in circulation is equivalent to around 1% of gross domestic product — compared to 8% in the US and more than 10% in the EU.
It is fear over exactly this kind of eventuality that has prompted governments and central banks in Scandinavia to try to reverse the public’s mass abandonment of cash that they themselves helped set in motion many years ago. As Sweden’s Riksbank warned last year, rapid digitalisation has made payments “more vulnerable to cyber attacks and disruptions to the power grid and data communication”.
Put simply, cash saved the day — a message that has been reported throughout the Spanish media over the past week. Those who didn’t have cash on them or at home suddenly found themselves trapped in an economic limbo, reports the right-leaning La Razón :
This technological “fade to black” has reopened the debate on the need to preserve cash, considered by some to be expendable…
Monday’s blackout highlighted the fragility of a completely digitised system. People trying to pay for a bus ticket, a loaf of bread or a taxi suddenly realised they did not have a single euro in their pockets. The ATM network did not offer a solution either, as it was also paralysed. The image of citizens rummaging for forgotten coins, asking strangers for help or asking for credit [from local businesses] reflects the degree of current technological dependence.
[T]he day after the blackout, long queues of citizens could be seen waiting to withdraw money from ATMs out of fear that the situation experienced hours earlier would be repeated.
Spain’s biggest financial newspaper, Expansión, notes that “cash, the most common payment method in Spain, has become the plan B option in emergency situations like the blackout”. The left-leaning El Diario highlights one of the main lessons of the blackout: “you have to carry cash with you”. The blackout “has reopened the debate on the importance of cash, which became the only real way to acquire basic products and services”, writes El Confidencial while El Periodico gave the final verdict: cash is “clearly still necessary in our daily lives”.
The Denaria Platform, an association founded in 2018 to protect the use of cash in Spain, has called on Spain’s Pedro Sánchez government to treat cash as critical national infrastructure, in accordance with the security and resilience guidelines for essential services.
“What happened on Monday is a clear sign of the fragility of the digital ecosystem and the need to have a physical, robust and independent alternative to the electricity and internet supply,” said the president of Denaria, Javier Rupérez. “This is not an ideological issue, but one of national security and the guarantee of fundamental rights. Cash must be protected, accessible and operational in all circumstances.”
However, Spain’s Pedro Sánchez government, which is on a clearly stated mission to squeeze the life out of cash, appears to have other ideas.
In June 2020, Moncloa, Spain’s seat of government, presented a non-legislative proposal to Congress advocating for “the gradual elimination of cash payments” as part of plans to increase tax collection and combat the black economy. Since then, it has slashed the national cash payment limit from $2,500 to $1,000, one of the lowest levels in Europe. To its credit, it did respond to nationwide protests against bank branch closures and the proliferation of cashless businesses by obligating retail establishments to accept cash payments.
But the long-term goal of the Sánchez government remains the same: to take cash down. Just before the blackout, it unveiled plans to take the criminalisation of cash to a whole new level. Spain’s tax agency implemented a raft of anti-money laundering measures including one stipulating that anyone planning to withdraw more than $3,000 of their own money from the bank must notify the State in advance, or risk facing punitive fines. They must also explain to their bank, and by extension the government, the reason(s) for the cash withdrawal.
From El Diario:
A new regulation has already come into force that tightens control over bank withdrawals. The Tax Agency has established that citizens and companies must notify in advance if they plan to withdraw large amounts of cash. If they do not do so, they will face penalties that can reach €150,000, depending on the seriousness of the infraction. This measure is part of the Government’s recently launched plans to combat tax fraud and money laundering.
According to the Treasury, withdrawals that exceed certain thresholds must be communicated through a specific procedure. Financial institutions will also have the obligation to report suspicious transactions.
The obligation to notify the Tax Agency of a cash withdrawal applies when the amount to be withdrawn equals or exceeds €3,000. Notice must be given at least 24 hours before carrying out the operation… For operations exceeding 100,000 euros, notice must be given at least 72 hours in advance.
The regulations establish that the notification must include data such as the amount being withdrawn, the purpose of the withdrawal, the identity of the customer and the final recipient of the money if the two are different. If this obligation is not complied with, it is considered a serious infraction. In the event of a withdrawal being detected without prior notice, a penalty may be imposed that varies between 1% and 10% of the amount withdrawn, with a minimum of 600 euros and a maximum of 150,000 euros.
The notification must be filed through the tax agency’s official website using a digital certificate, Cl@ve PIN, or electronic ID card. If approved, the bank customer will then receive a receipt that must be shown at the bank when withdrawing his or her cash. On Banco Sabadell’s website, customers are advised that if they need to withdraw more than €3,000 at once, the bank will ask for proof of the reason for the withdrawal. This receipt is then sent to the Tax Agency and the Bank of Spain.
Back to the article:
This measure also relies on the active collaboration of banks, which must temporarily block operations if they detect that the requirement of prior notification has not been met. In addition, they must send periodic information to the Treasury on cash movements that exceed the established thresholds. The spotlight is also on repeated operations for lower amounts, such as withdrawals of €800 or 900 €euros, which could raise suspicions if they are not properly supported.
Until now, withdrawn amounts of €3,000 euros or more only had to be reported by the bank in question to the Spanish central bank, which in turn reports them to the tax authority. These reports will presumably continue to take place.
But it’s not just the money coming out of bank accounts that the government wants to know all about; it also wants to know about the money going in to them.
According to El Español, the Spanish Tax Agency will be requesting proof of the provenance of funds if an amount equal to or greater than €3,000 is deposited in a bank. If a bank customer deposits smaller amounts across different days, it will also be considered suspicious. If the provenance of funds cannot be demonstrated in a satisfactory manner, the Tax Agency reserves the right to impose fines of up to 150% of the money deposited, with maximum fines of up to €150,000 in the most serious cases.
The Bank of Spain recommends keeping all the receipts, contracts and any other type of documentation necessary to explain the origin of the money that we deposit in the bank or what we are going to use it for if it is withdrawn.
Interesting Timing
This is all happening as the European Union gears up to launch its central bank digital currency, the digital euro. As we reported in late March, the two main EU authorities driving the rollout of the digital euro, the European Central Bank and the EU Commission, are keen to bring forward the launch, even as most Euro Area citizens surveyed on the matter seem broadly disinterested in their proposed CBDC.
As previously mentioned, it is not easy to sell a project that is broadly seen, even by many politicians and some central bank insiders around the world, not only as a “solution in search of a problem” but one that is fraught with risks. Even the German MEP appointed to lead the European Parliament’s legislative push for a digital euro, the Rapporteur Stefan Berger, became one of its fiercest critics, eventually stepping down from the role.
And there is plenty to criticise about the proposed digital euro, including the threat it would pose to financial privacy, particularly in a world where cash has been totally eliminated, which is the ultimate goal of the Spanish government. There is also the way programmable currencies like the digital euro could be used not only to monitor our spending but also control it. A digital euro will almost certainly go hand in hand with the EU’s digital identity wallet, allowing for the creation of an almost perfect digital control grid.
Combining digital currencies with digital IDs while phasing out, or even banning, the use of cash would grant governments and central banks the ability not only to track every purchase we make but also to determine what we can and cannot spend our money on. They could also be used to strongly encourage “desirable” social and political behaviour while penalizing those who do not toe the line.
As the German financial journalist and cash advocate Norbert Häring puts it, the only discernible function of the digital euro is to “help displace cash and bring Europe closer to total digital surveillance.”
Spain has seen a flurry of articles in the mainstream media over the past few days arguing that the proposed digital euro would have fared well during last week’s blackout since it will apparently be able to function both online and offline (while apparently also not needing electricity). The ECB and EU Commission are currently trying to sell the project to the EU citizenry, and their ostensible representatives in Brussels whose support they will need in the European Parliament’s vote on the definitive legal framework for the digital euro in October.
One popular argument in favour of the proposed CBDC currently doing the rounds is that a digital euro would allow Europe to defend itself not only against the stablecoins being let loose by the Trump administration’s hands-off regulatory approach but also the US card duopoly that dominates the global payments landscape, Visa and Mastercard.
But it’s probably going to take more than that to persuade European citizens to actually embrace the ECB’s digital euro. In a recent Ipsos study, 65% of Spanish respondents said they were were quite comfortable with current payment methods and would not use the digital euro. In Germany, fewer than half of the respondents said they trusted the proposed CBDC.
There is certainly cause for pause. As we noted in our recent post, Five Reasons Why Euro Area Citizens Should Be Terrified By the ECB’s (Apparently) Fast Approaching Digital Euro, senior eurocrats in Brussels are openly talking about dipping into the citizenry’s private savings in order to fund Europe’s rearmament:
Europe has all it needs to take the lead in the competitiveness race.
This month, the @EU_Commission will unveil the 🇪🇺 Savings & Investments Union.
We'll turn private savings into much needed investment.
And we’ll work with our institutional partners to get it off the ground pic.twitter.com/rtd0UqCeut
— Ursula von der Leyen (@vonderleyen) March 10, 2025
In other times of widespread war, European and North American governments have been able to raise funds by selling war bonds to the citizenry. But that has tended to work only when the government of the day and its war effort enjoy a minimal level of popularity. That is unlikely to be the case with the EU’s attempts to keep project Ukraine alive.
So, instead, Brussels is seeking to rewrite its own regulations, primarily aimed at protecting investors, in order to make it easier for investment funds to invest in arms manufacturers, including in securitised assets. The plan appears to have been in the pipeline for some time. Over a year ago, France’s Minister for the Economy Bruno Le Maire declared that Europe does not have sufficient funds and needs to “mobilize all of Europeans’ savings – 35 trillion euros – to finance the climate transition, fund our defence efforts, and invest in artificial intelligence.”
Unreal.
This is Bruno Le Maire, France's Minister of the Economy. You might know him as the genius strategist who said he was going to "cause the collapse of the Russian economy"…
Now he is straight out declaring that Europe has run out of money (it "does not have sufficient… https://t.co/fra7DeEoCE
— Arnaud Bertrand (@RnaudBertrand) February 23, 2024
The fact that an increasingly militarised and authoritarian EU is openly coveting its citizens’ vast savings pool and is willing to significantly water down investment protections in order to get it should also set off alarm bells regarding its digital euro plans. If the ECB and EU Commission are able to successfully launch a digital euro (still a big “IF” since no G20 central bank has managed to pull it off), they will have far greater control over — and by extension, easier access to — our funds.
The fact that one of the bloc’s largest economies, Spain, has just introduced new rules to make it much more difficult for its citizens to take their own money out of the bank should give even more pause. This being the EU, it is safe to assume that the restrictions will be replicated in other EU countries, as was the case with the upper cash payment limits pioneered in Spain, France, Italy and Greece.
In a recent post, Häring suggests there could be an additional motive at work — namely to prevent physical bank runs by locking money up in the system (machine translated):
Locking up money in the event of a crisis could even be the main goal of the new regulation, along with further intimidating potential cash users. The authorities have already been informed by the banks about larger cash transactions, in Spain as well as in Germany and the rest of the EU. Also, under the pretext of limited cash reserves, the banks already require that larger withdrawals be announced to them a few days in advance. In fact, this is due to the requirements of the banking supervisors, which in turn are based on the requirements of the international shadow authority Financial Action Task Force (FATF). Banks must use the pre-notification period to report planned withdrawals to the authorities and give them the opportunity to object.
So the banks and the state already have a few days’ warning time if their customers want to withdraw money en masse. Such a bank run could blow up the entire system, since the banks can only liquidate and pay out a fraction of their customers’ deposits. If a bank run was announced, the banking supervisory authority would simply prohibit the withdrawal of cash and transfers abroad. Then the money cannot leave the banking system.
What is new about the Spanish regulation is that it is now a severely punishable offence if you take your money out of the banking system by withdrawing 1,000 or 2,000 euros every day from an ATM, for example, and possibly at several banks of which you are a customer. This closes one of the last loopholes that allow you to withdraw money from the banking system if you fear that the banking system could collapse.
21 comments
Comments are closed.
Important reporting, Nick. One proof-reading comment from the stalls here: you might want to explain the reference to Moncloa, which is a metonym for the Spanish parliament, like Westminster in the UK, IIRC.
The commodity nature of cash – anonymous, fungible, a chattel rather than a debt relationship – is being eroded on all fronts for specious reasons.
How many of these reports ever uncover serious crime? The big fish hire crooked lawyers to launder their money and keep most of the proceeds if they are wise in property, precious metal and gems, cash under the mattress and Treasuries. And presumably cryptocurrencies.
Still, it should catch a few Spanish politicians out over time…. :-)
Thanks for the heads-up, Revenant. Have added the clarification: “Spain’s seat of government”, which actually makes it more akin to Downing Street than Westminster
‘The commodity nature of cash – anonymous, fungible, a chattel rather than a debt relationship – is being eroded on all fronts for specious reasons.’
Immensely important point. Thank you, Revenant. A debt relationship that will moreover be recorded only on electronic ledgers that our would-be masters alone will have access to or control over, if they have their way.
A modern indentured servitude for which there is no escape from. I am awaiting the day that Congress passes a law that debts will be inherited .
The real reasons aren’t talked about in public.
When the Euro was created the various EU countries’ debts weren’t consolidated.
The chickens are coming home to roost, as the saying goes.
A Euro digital-id leading to a digital currency is seen as the way out of the growing financial quagmire for the Eurocrats. It’s the ultimate capital controls system for the EU and Euro. Thinking of moving your money out of the Eurozone? Think again. (It will not end well.) / my 2 cents
I just read the article setting out how the DOGE Crew is ‘degrading’ the American Social Security system. Pair that exercise in Silicon Valley Exceptionalism with a fully realized Central Bank Digital Currency and we have the perfect combination of The Panopticon and Shock and Awe Therapy.
The “logical extreme” of these trends is obvious. As in the bad old days of other, previous authoritarian regimes, let the citizen step out of line and they could be relegated to non-personhood.
Control is the name of the game here, and with Control comes Power.
The emerging social system is a sociopath’s wet dream.
Stay safe.
Yes, I understand that the ruling class has a pathological need to appear strong while righteously pillaging Western civilization to actual collapse, but somehow I am still surprised that the educated class doesn’t seem to understand how having no way to pay for anything including food, clothing, and shelter is bad for business. So bad that just getting the gendarmerie out and lethal will fail. This includes large corporations and call them terrorists seems likely to fail.
If nothing else, having a well publicized campaign to strengthen the power grid would likely make kill cash easier.
“educated” class
Well, that is the claim.
Currently in Spain you can’t pay in cash anything if it costs more than 1,000 EUR. You have to pay by bank card, transfer, a bill charged to your account, cheque (if there is anyone who accepts them), or whatever but cash. The usual trick is to make two or more bills avoinding to cross the 1,000 euros barrier (two bills of 900 euros instead of one of 1,800), but this trick obviously don’t work if you can’t break the payment, for instance you need to change your water heater at home and there is none with a price under one thousand euros. I usually prefer to pay via bank transfer, but many shops don’t accept (a bank transfer can be annuled wihtin 48 hours), nor they are interested in charge a bill to your bank.account, so the (literally) only way to pay is bank card.
You are forced to have a bank account, there are a lot of services, and even public matters, which you can only pay (or receiving money) accepting bills charged to your bank account, no other way. You have also to have a bank card (or bank app) if you want to pay goods or services over the 1,000 euros barrier. Spain was the country of the EU where people retained at home most of the circulating 500 euros banknotes (not printed anymore, but still legal tender).
Then if you become homeless and have no cell phone, you totally become a non-person…
There’s another option – pay by credit card and never pay your credit card bill. I expect this option to proliferate as the war on cash continues.
I used to enjoy flummoxing the telemarketers who called trying to sell me credit cards. I’d tell them I wanted the max limit and ask how many cards I could get, with the caveat that I planned to never pay them back a single dime. Eventually, for some reason they all stopped calling me.
For the Brusselcrats, it would solve a looming problem. That of Too Big Too Fail Banks. So suppose that the EU succeeds in their plans with digital cash. Then one day through their own sheer incompetence, Deutsche Bank implodes. Now that bank has a market capitalization of some 45 billion Euros but who know what other obligations would get uncovered. But with digital cash, everything can be done through a few keystrokes. All those that have accounts in Deutsche Bank will have their accounts frozen. Well, except for a select few who will be allowed to quietly cash out. You know that it will happen. Then everybody in the EU that has a bank account there will be forced to take part in a EU-wide bail-in. They will take a chunk of your cash and leave you with an IOU or maybe shares in Deutsche Bank or maybe they will just mutter a promise. With digital cash you won’t have a choice and if you go to take money out of an ATM may find that all EU ATMs now have a 100 Euro withdrawal limit, even though you are just withdrawing just ones and zeroes. The best thing for the EU is that they will not be on the hook for bailing out those TBTF banks but it will all be loaded on the shoulders – and bank accounts – of us muppets. I could see this happening very easily after what happened in Cyprus-
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012%E2%80%932013_Cypriot_financial_crisis
It’s almost laughable how dumb these people are. The day they bail in any bank will be the day they trigger the largest bank run in history. And if they think making the money digital will stop people or make it irrelevant will be the day they learn how cleaver their citizens really are.
My god, if that “how cleaver their citizens are” was not a typo, I’m your fan for life.
LOL!!! I didn’t even notice that, but I keep telling people it’s only a matter of time before someone suggests sharpening the guillotine. A “cleaver” would work too.
How likely is it that this might bring about a return of the CNT/FAI? One wonders, one hopes.
A Spanish relative of mine, whose views skew rather more to the paranoid than mine do (meaning he’s usually right and I’m usually disappointed), has said for years that the Spanish banking system is unusually rapacious even by the lofty standards of that industry, practicing all manner of arbitrary bankfare with account freezes and such. I have to imagine that the resilience of cash transactions in Spain arises in part from a deep and abiding lack of faith in her financial institutions – which also makes me wonder if the war on cash there is really just a localized phenomenon rather than a more massive European bureaucratic push. Spanish banks seem entirely disinterested in their customers having any faith in them, whereas something like the Sweden example above suggests to me that Scandinavian financiers would like to avoid all hell breaking loose if indeed the northlands suffer a similar event to what befell Iberia last week.
I get it that taking out any amount of your own cash shouldn’t require reporting, but Spain does have a large black economy, 20% last reported, this results in a lot of lost tax revenue. So this new rule has to be linked to reducing the black economy, unless someone has a better idea, it could control the black economy.
If you can’t trust the Bankers and Politicians, who can you trust?
Actors?